Persuasive Essay On Capital Punishment

Capital punishment is one of the most controversial topics in today’s world. Many people believe that it is morally wrong to have capital punishment as a sentence to a crime. People also do believe that it is morally permissible for a severe crime. Capital punishment is also known as the death penalty. It can be given as a sentence when somebody is convicted of an extremely violent crime. The biggest issue that can be seen with this is that somebody could be innocent and sentenced with the death penalty because of the nature of the crime that they have been accused of even if they didn’t commit it. I believe that there is a moral line between using the death penalty and using other forms of punishment.

Capital punishment, which is also known as the death penalty, is the punishment of a crime by execution. This extreme retribution is reserved for those who have committed heinous, or capital crimes against society, therefore considered an ongoing threat. Capital punishment was abolished from the Canadian Criminal Code in 1976. It was substituted with a compulsory life sentence without possibility of parole for 25 years for all first-degree murders. However capital punishment is still practiced in over 30 of the 50 states in the USA. Some say that Capital Punishment is an unjust solution to crime, and others say that it isn’t a solution at all, as it is subject to flaws just as any system can be flawed. Dating back, before the Eighteenth Century B.C., Capital Punishment has been an integral part of the judicial system in the majority of countries. Considered to be the ultimate punishment, few criminal offenders will receive this ultimate form of retribution. The State of Texas has the highest record of executions at 300 since the 1970’s. Those executed are murderers and those who have committed serious offenses. The idea is "an eye for an eye", but as Gandhi wisely stated, “An eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind”. Shockingly, there have been convicted criminals executed only to be proven innocent later, this is far too late after they have long been

In an effort to make sure that innocent men and women are not wrongly convicted in capital punishments cases, they are given a wide range of appeals procedures. Immediately following sentencing an automatic appeals process called Direct Review begins. It is during this process that appellate courts review the lower trial court’s decision, checking for errors and making sure the case was tried on sound judgment. If any errors are found

Perhaps we should give the judge a knife and tell her that if she has

I have recently viewed your thought-provoking article about the use of capital punishment and believe that both your arguments and the principles you support are tenuous. Finding someone with views vastly different from my own is rather startling, so by analysing the indifferent conclusions you have discussed in your writing I am hopeful I will present a strong counter-argument to the questionable ideas you strongly believe in.

Capital punishment in the United States is a widely debated topic due to the many opposing views of abolitionists, people who want the death penalty abolished. The controversy led to continuous changes in the legalization of the death penalty in the late 1900’s. As noted by Wesley Lowe, a popular Retentionist and author of “The Death Penalty in the United States,” capital punishment was terminated in 1967, but reinstated in 1977. However, state-sanctioned executions are only authorized for certain heinous crimes and must be implemented in the least barbaric ways. According to Tracy Snell, Bureau of Justice Statistician, this type of punishment is only used for certain acts of violence, such as first-degree murder; and it is performed in various ways, including lethal injection and electrocution (5-6). The death sentence still remains in effect today in 31states and receives support from 60% of the United states people (Wikipedia Contributors). These people who support the death penalty, also known as Retentionists, provide indisputable arguments, and refute the opposing views. Capital punishment in the United States is necessary because it provides an equitable punishment, while ensuring the safety of citizens and honoring the lives of the victims.

Capital punishment has been a basic piece of human culture and its lawful framework for a considerable length of time. It is often viewed as a vital sanction to the most heinous of crimes as well as an approach to stop future lawbreakers by fear of death. In many cases, this sort of punishment came to be viewed as an immoral act against humanity, and its legitimacy in a plethora of legal systems has been addressed. As of recently, the civil argument persists. This brought about a wide disparity of laws on this issue. A few countries including China, the US, Iran, Belarus, and others protect capital punishment as a choice, while others like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, and every European country have canceled the death penalty. Despite the obvious negatives, others chose to keep the practice in their laws. The death penalty is an overzealous “eye for an eye” tactic, that is and has been damaging the fabric of our society. The expense, the immorality and the control over another life to such degree, should be cause enough for any country to not just rethink this heinous and inhumane punishment but to abolish it. The United States inheritance of slavery and racial corruption proceeded with offense, in our utilization of capital punishment, where nearly three times the general population on death row is of black decent.

It does not take much to recognize that the human race is a well-developed and remarkable species. If aliens were to land anywhere on Earth tomorrow, they would probably marvel at our communication constructs and institutions that we have created over the years to organize our lives and how we relate to others. However, they would also notice that we are far from perfect. Humans are no stranger to crime and are ultimately a selfish species. In order for our society to run, we have allowed necessary evils to become a common construct in our day to day lives. Necessary evils are constructs that do some harm but generally create order and good in the end, creating a Utilitarian-esque outcome. Capital punishment in America is a necessary evil; it may cause a minimal amount of harm to the criminal, but on a larger scale, killing a person that has shown no respect for human life acts as a deterrent for future crimes and gives victims justice. Capital punishment is justified in the case of murder where no mitigating circumstances are present.

Sitting in the cell, surrounded by guards, and knowing that this was it, Phillip walks to his demise. He flashes back to his family, and how much he regrets his only crime of drug possession. While he was cruising to work, he got pulled over for a broken taillight, and the encounter ended with the cop finding a block of cocaine in the trunk. Phillip intended to sell it for some extra cash, as his factory job wasn’t paying enough to support him and his family in their small apartment. As Phillip got laid out on the table to be injected with chemicals to end his life, he started to shake and whimper as he witnessed the machine flow chemicals into his bloodstream, and dies with seeing disappointed faces staring at him. Stories of criminals that commit petty crimes who are given the death sentence are not unheard of in the American Justice System, and will keep happening if the death penalty is kept in place. Therefore, capital punishment should be banned in America.

Capital Punishment is a method of retribution used in order to punish those who have committed heinous crimes. This form of punishment causes many questions to arise regarding the ethics, morals, and logistics behind it. These questions cause the death penalty to become a highly debated and highly controversial topic that continues to lead discussions. In regards to these questions capital punishment is inhumane, expensive, and ineffective and therefore should be declared unconstitutional in the United States.

“But secondly you say 'society must exact vengeance, and society must punish'. Wrong on both counts. Vengeance comes from the individual and punishment from God.”

This position paper will attempt to challenge previous opinions regarding capital punishment. The objective is to persuade the audience to oppose capital punishment by revealing biblical, political, and moral perspectives, as well as supplying effective counters to traditional thinking. This paper seeks to balance each rationale in order to appeal to several mindsets, and beliefs in regard to capital punishment.

For decades, an age old cultural means of justice has been questioned and debated between its supporters and protesters. In the last four to five decades though, the ideals of capital punishment have been brought directly to the forefront of society and put on display for citizens to analyze at their own will. While both sides have contributed heavily to the conversation, the outcry has been negative for a majority of the time. While the ideals of capital punishment once benefitted the sentiments of society, being harsh and reciprocal in the sense of justice, it no longer creates the same feeling among Americans. Capital punishment is no longer an effective force of justice in American society as it does not comply with the humane values being installed by other developed countries and the agendas of American political parties, it is far less socially and legally effective than a life-long prison sentence, and the legal process is too long and drawn out to be effective in any way and create a sense of imminent danger for a potential criminal.

Monsters are real. Not the monsters Inc., blue purple and fluffy kind, but the human kind. There are people in our country and in our world that have mental illness. A lot of the people with mental illnesses overcome them and do amazing things with their life, but some turn into monsters. The people who can’t control themselves and do horrible, unthinkable things are the monsters that our parents can’t always protect us from. Just as parents get rid of the monsters under our beds and in our closets, the government should be able to get rid of the monsters in our country. This is why I believe in capital punishment.

Should any individual be murdered for their violations or errors? Adam Liptak, an essayist for the New York Times, found that, "As per about twelve late investigations, executions spare lives. For every prisoner put to death, the examinations say, 3 to 18 murders are forestalled." Along these lines, capital punishment must be maintained in the Unified Conditions of America keeping in mind the end goal to secure its natives and to appropriately authorize equity.