Persuasive Essay On Clean Power Plan

Most parents would do anything for their children. If their child needs a new organ, pending their compatibility, they would give them theirs. Many parents work two or three dead end jobs just to ensure their child can go to college. So why does society not take the air that these children breath more serious? Most likely, because the problem does not come in a physical form. Air pollution does not come in the form of a giant two headed monster or a giant lump on your body. Air pollution is invisible to the human eye. To see it, special equipment from Nasa or other research facility would be required. But just because it’s not visible, does not mean it’s not present. Air pollution surrounds humans daily. It is caused by motor vehicles, planes, ships, energy plants, and much more. Humans cannot just take away automobiles or the energy plants. And humanity cannot eliminate all the pollution in the air. But pollution can be reduced to the point where it will decrease the number of stoke, asthma, and lung cancer. Society can reduce air pollution by making better use of vehicles, planting more trees, and decreasing energy use.

Shifting the majority of energy consumption in the U.S. to clean energy would affect people and businesses both in and outside of the nation. This inevitably creates concern surrounding the topic and causes delays due to necessary controversy and questioning. While plenty of concerns are valid, others have been answered by studies and reports by various organizations but have yet to reach the public in masses.

Is coal power the best option for Australia, as current ‘green’ energy options are unable to support our power needs now and into the future.

Congress needs to introduce legislation that increasing environmental study of air compliance, emission control of big industry that are currently using fossil fuels, force automakers to aggressively seek out more alternative sources of renewable energy, and a nationwide study of the US global carbon footprint needs to be reevaluated. The Environmental Protection Agency along with the current administration needs to invest deeper into renewable and sustainable energy projects.

Common-sense regulatory initiatives, developed by EPA to minimize greenhouse gas was found to be efficient. For example, EPA's vehicle greenhouse gas rules will save consumers $1.7 trillion at the pump by 2025, and eliminate six billion metric tons of GHG pollution. EPA's Clean Power Plan addresses emissions from power plants, the largest source of carbon pollution in the country. When the Clean Power Plan is fully in place in 2030, carbon pollution from the power sector will be 32 percent below 2005

However, the Action Plan is not likely to produce 9.8 Mt in new reductions by 2020, as the government stated. For example, the government claimed that using Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account funds to subsidize electricity prices which would produce 3 Mt in emission reductions. We found no evidence to support this claim and concluded that subsidizing electricity rates is not an acceptable use of these funds. Fortunately, the government is no longer proposing to divert Greenhouse Gas Reduction Account funds in this way.

President Trump chose Myron Ebell , one of the best climate skeptics to lead his EPA transition team. Ebell also says that “everything will be just fine”. These two major people have no regards for climate change, and with the choices that they are making now, we can see the direction that this country is going in. The Trump Administration is most likely to be a disaster when it comes to the health and safety of the planet. President Obama plan is to reduce carbon pollution from power plants that take real action on climate change. After some revisions, “the final Clean Power Plan is fair, flexible and designed to strengthen the fast-growing trend toward cleaner and lower-polluting American energy. With strong but achievable standards for power plants, and customized goals for states to cut the carbon pollution that is driving climate change, the Clean Power Plan provides national consistency, accountability and a level playing field while reflecting each state’s energy mix. It also shows the world that the United States is committed to leading global efforts to address climate change.” This was one of the most successful plans

Many sources including the EPA say that the new climate change plan will create 273,000 new jobs starting from 2016 and lasting through 2040. Researchers at the University of Maryland-based Interindustry Economic Research Fund are an example of a source that states 273,000 jobs will be created, but not only will jobs be created they are saying electricity bills will also be lowered. The analysts say that the plan will add 74,000 jobs by the year 2020. According to new economic analysts the EPA climate plan will not have any negative effects on the economy. Yes, many coal jobs will be destroyed, but a majority of those jobs will be replaced with new ones. The coal plant jobs that will be destroyed along with the coal plants will be mostly replace with new ones to create cleaner air. Hundreds of thousands of jobs will be created in the next 26 years, this is explained as an amazing growth in a “short” amount of time. Within 5 years of the climate plan beginning there will already be 74,000 jobs. Every state her in the U.S. will benefit from the climate plan, but there are 13 states that will benefit from it much more when it comes to new jobs. The jobs that will have the biggest rises in employment will be, electricians, carpenters, roofers, heating and air conditioning installers, insulation workers, and heavy equipment operators. Obama has said that the advance biofuel industries will play a big role in

The Energy Policy Act (EPA) of 2005 got pass by the U.S. Congress on July 29, 2005 and was signed by President George W. Bush on August 8, 2005. This Act addresses energy production in United States as an effort to overcome energy problems by providing loan guarantees and tax incentives for entities that develop or use innovative technologies that avoid the production of greenhouse gases.

. In 2012, President Obama signed into law a drastic Corporate Average Fuel Economy (C.A.F.E.) standard whereas all new passenger cars and trucks must increase fuel economy to 54.5 miles per gallon (MPG) by 2025. This new law touts that it will save American consumers more than $8,000 in gas over the life of the vehicle, reduce oil consumption by 2 million barrels of oil per day, and cut harmful greenhouse gases by 6 billion metric tons over the life of the program (The White House). On the surface, these statistics appear to benefit both the consumer, and the earth. However, when one looks at the bigger picture and statistics, it does very little to benefit either the earth or even less the consumer. If the administration really wanted to

The importance of the environment appears when many disconcerting events throughout the years have emerged: tsunami and flooding, drought and starving, pollution, declining animal populations and many others. Looking behind these events is make us realize that we have caused irreversible damaged, through our daily behaviors.

The article “Stay of clean power plan should not halt Pennsylvania’s progress” discusses Pennsylvania moving forward in their course to reduce emissions of carbon. A clean power plan in every state will prove to help reduce carbon emission in the atmosphere, and provide cleaner air for all Pennsylvania and United States residents. Clean power plan for cleaner air is a state, local, and national government political

In August 2015 President Obama and the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) finalized their plan to cut carbon pollution and drive climate change, called the Clean Power Plan. President Obama first announced his rededication to Climate change in a speech at Georgetown University, in June of 2013, saying: “I refuse to condemn your generation and future generations to a planet that is beyond fixing” (whitehouse.gov). Indeed, since, Obama has once again stepped back into the belief that fixing our planet is not only what is right, but also it is what is necessary for the people of tomorrow to live in a world that is not damaging to their health.

Public policy that results in reduced carbon emissions will be possible through the Clean Power Plan due to support from elected officials. The Obama Administration has been the strongest force driving the policy. Other federal, state and local public officials are also providing

Thanks to the Clean Water Act, we have come a long way from the days of rivers catching fire. The Clean Water Act required industries and municipalities to filter out wastes before they reached the water. The culprits of yesterday, factories and sewage treatment plants, are largely under control. Additionally, those “point sources” of pollution were easy to identify and target because they generally discharged pollutants directly into the water. However, much of our assessed surface waters are still impaired since they do not meet ambient water quality standards. Today’s sources of water pollution, “nonpoint sources,” are more discrete and therefore harder to control. Mainly, this insidious form of pollution takes the shape of “runoff