Persuasive Essay On Cloning Animals

Some people actually say that we can benefit from cloning. Scientists think that we can clone “geniuses” and advance in society (Utah Genetics). This brings up a very good point. What if we can clone 5 Albert Einsteins?! What if we clone all of the smartest minds to ever exist. Can we cure cancer? I think we can! Maybe we can even stop ebola. Lots of people are seriously thinking about this and how beneficial it would be. But some people can take this out of hand. Some scientists are considering making “human farms” where clones are made and their only purpose is to kill them and take their organs to sell. This is why cloning should not be easily accessible. Some freaky scientists are actually considering this idea. We need to be smarter, we need to be consistent , and we need to keep an eye out for these crazy scientists. And God knows what other crazy idea they have inside their heads. But many people think that cloning can be beneficial to society if it is used

Pet cloning is our future and our present. Though it doesn't make it right. Cloning for instance, cost thousands. Not only expensive, it puts the carrier animal severe pain. It also gives the clone a higher risk of getting diseases. Just ask Dolly the sheep, if she didn’t die at a young age. Cloning may seem like a good thing but over all it is not for many reasons.

Animal cloning is happening in today's society, people are split on either side that it is a big step into human race future, or if it is a part of science that humans shouldn’t be a part of. Cloning is done by removing a cell, then transfer the DNA into the egg of a donor, the animal would then grow up to look like the original. Cloning by humans is not the only way to clone, asexual reproduction is considered cloning used by bacteria. Humans consider the fact that you have a twin means that you have clone. So there are the facts to take in that cloning has been happening for a long time and that it is also done naturally. The big issue on animal cloning is more on the fact that many birth defects can happen to the cloned animal because it is such a high percentage. Clones that have defects such as two heads or extra body parts do have a small chance to live to the adult age. On the other side humans see cloning as a way of survival, with testing done on animals we could look back into the past and bring extinct animals from it. Many home pets have been cloned properly to look like an exact replica of the original, but the personality is the key difference between both. With experiments we now know cloning can be beneficial in some ways, but there is always a draw back. Another con to cloning is that it reduces the diversity in genetics, since cloning is using exact genes it has the potential to limit diversity in the species, there may be a time where organisms will no longer breed naturally. But the con that most people think of is that one day, humans would be able to clone themselves. This scenario is more of a moral dilemma because it is not natural and goes against many people and what they believe in, the fear comes from the movies and books because no human has ever been cloned, and then the wars will start because the fear of death would no longer be there. This is all just one side of the issue, the pro side looks for advancements to benefit humans. Cloning can help produce the best animal population with healthy genes. This could mean that humans can keep endangered animals from becoming extinct, this also means that with the raw material

There are some people that have been very anxious with cloning because they believe it is something new, but in reality it was introduced in the 1950s. It started with cloning food and has moved onto cloning animals. It has been successful on many different cases and a famous one is the cloning of a sheep named Dolly. Dolly lived to be six and a half years old and she had six kids. People believe that cloning should be illegal but we believe that scientists should clone endangered or extinct species in order to preserve them, here’s why.

Recently the ability to clone a human being has become a very realistic possibility. However, the issue of morality has taken center stage on this topic. A Gallup poll taken in 1997 revealed eighty-eight percent of Americans stated, "cloning human beings would be morally wrong" (Dudley

Ever since the first cloned animal, Dolly the sheep, in 1996 the argument has arose that if cloning a human is appropriate. Not only is there an argument for human cloning but, in the past couple years there has been many debates on whether it is right or wrong to clone a horse. Cloning refers to the process of creating genetically similar organisms or the production of organisms that are genetically identical through the transfer of somatic cells of an existing organism and transferring it to an oocyte where the nucleus has been extracted. To clone a horse means using the DNA from a donor horse to produce a genetically identical foal. Thus, the question is asked why would someone need to clone a horse? When there is a horse that shows exceptional talent, in particularly a gelding, cloning allows the horses DNA and look to be accessible in the form of a

I’ve seen your voting records and your campaigns from the past years and the current ones and i’ve seen that you’re helping people with fundraisers so I’m pretty sure that you’ll agree with me with not starting to clone and never start it. I believe it is the most unacceptable idea of how it will affect the people in a really bad way. Also, I believe that the taxpayer can benefit something else like actually help the people who need the money.

Your dog dies, and your mom offers to get you a new one, but you don't want a new dog, you don't want a new dog like your old dog, you want your old dog. Cloning isn't the right answer, it's expensive, the clones are different from the original, and cloning doesn't always go the way scientists want it to.

In 2008, The U.S. Food and Drug Administration declared it safe for humans to consume cloned animal products, such as meat and dairy-based products. This has captured the attention of many people throughout the entire world and has ignited debates about the many issues that accompany animal cloning. There are many ways that animal cloning can affect us, but we will focus on the more serious conflicts. Cloning can pose serious health risks to the animals involved in the process, creating complications for animal welfare. Cloning animals will also impact the consumer and agricultural industry, and the breeding stock industry. Finally, cloning animals will bring about the morals and ethics of cloning itself and if it should or should not be allowed.

Thanks to modern medicine and scientific research, cloning is a reality and no longer science fiction. We may great advancements to Sam cell research as well, leading to cures for diseases. All of this is very different though from what Victor Frankenstein tried when he built the monster.

Human beings have inhabited the Earth for virtually only a fraction of a second of the planet’s existence. In this regard, our presence seems miniscule and insignificant. However in this “blink of an eye”, we have brought extensive and unforgivable destruction to our planet. The problems we now face are complex and many: global warming, the pollution of air and water, species extinction, deforestation, water depletion, oceanic dead zones, chronic diseases, poverty, world hunger (and on the opposite side of the spectrum of wealth, obesity), and violence to people and animals. Corruption and greed dictate the ebbs and flows of money, and little is being done to reverse the consequences. A Cree Indian prophecy reads, “Only after the last tree

Have you heard about the new bill coming up, if you haven't let me tell you what I think you should vote on it. I think you should vote no on the new cloning law coming up. I think it is immoral to clone humans. I also think that we shouldn’t waste taxpayer money to do it, it is morally incorrect, and it could lead down a dark future. I think that we should completely ban cloning of humans. It isn’t right to make an exact copy of someone. Especially for medical research or to harvest him just for his parts. It sacrifices one life just to save another. That is definitely not what this country is about or wants. Especially if they have multiple medical problems in their lifetime. Ten people could be murdered just for the safety of another. It is completely wrong and immoral.

When looked up on Google i hear well spoken thoughts on you. After reading your background and what made you into who you are today made me realize that you are a well spoken person. This letter is in regards of passing a bill on cloning. Cloning is when person is basically replicated. This is not always the case because the experiment can also be done to animals. Pet owners choose to pay extra money to buy a pet that will be categorized as in the “superior breed”. I understand that you are a businesswoman and make decisions that will not only have an effect on you but the U.S. I hope that you take this into consideration and let my words help make a positive impact to the communities throughout the U.S.

Religious views are prevalent, so too are numerous ethical concerns. The issue of whether or not the government should ban cloning has gained progressive attention, as the science of animal cloning is further perfected. BIOLOGICAL BACKGROUND Animal cloning is the process of creating a biological replicate of another organism with the

In 1997, the first clone of a sheep named Dolly was created. This embryo had a success rate of one to four percent. When applied to humans, this percentage may decrease and become lower and more unpredictable. With lives at stake, is it worth the risk of the embryos involved in the unstable process? Although cloning may allow for new medical procedures and research of diseases and cures, it takes away from the natural biological order of life, and allows humans to "play God" while creating a margin of error which could result in many defects.