Persuasive Essay On Cloning

Now that we are advancing in technology very rapidly, people are starting to wonder if it would be beneficial to clone humans. Some people say that you can literally save a person's life and create an exact replica of person by cloning. But some people say it’s not humane and it would be weird if there is 2 of the exact same person in the world. People are also concerned because nobody knows how these clones will act. We don’t know if the host will be harmed and we also don’t know if the clones will become evil and destroy the world. I believe that we shouldn’t clone humans simply because we don’t have enough information on cloning.

There are some people that have been very anxious with cloning because they believe it is something new, but in reality it was introduced in the 1950s. It started with cloning food and has moved onto cloning animals. It has been successful on many different cases and a famous one is the cloning of a sheep named Dolly. Dolly lived to be six and a half years old and she had six kids. People believe that cloning should be illegal but we believe that scientists should clone endangered or extinct species in order to preserve them, here’s why.

Imagine a world where everyone looked like you and was related to you as a sibling, cousin, or any form of relation, wouldn’t that be freaky? Although cloning is not an important issue presently, it could potentially replace sexual reproduction as our method of producing children. Cloning is a dangerous possibility because it could lead to an over-emphasis on the importance of the genotype, no guaranteed live births, and present risks to both the cloned child and surrogate mother. It also violates the biological parent-child relationship and can cause the destruction of the normal structure of a family. The cloning of the deceased is another problem with cloning because it displays the inability of the parents to accept the child’s

I’m currently a junior in high school. I’m writing this letter to you to share my concern about cloning.

I would like to introduce myself as Brian Sierra. I am a junior at Dinuba High School in California. A new bill just came up and it allows the use of taxpayer money to found both therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all animals and humans. I am going to tell you all the advantages and all the good stuff we could do with both ways of reproduction. I want to tell you that I am approving this subject because reproductive and therapeutic cloning would really benefit a lot of people’s life. Even though a lot of people are against both ways of cloning. They just talk about the disadvantages and the problems that is has. Cloning could be used in a good way and I am going to tell you the advantages and all the good stuff we could do with both ways of cloning.

Therapeutic and rReproductive cloning can change the world, in not just one, but many other ways. Cloning can help countries and it would make the U.S not just a good state, but a better countrystate. Tax payer money should fund cloning, because it can replace damaged organs, produce livestock for the countries that are in need, and also help couples that can’t have children.

An opportunity in science has risen since the late 1990s, and that is cloning. Now scientists feel as if they have the technology to clone even humans, one of the most complex life forms on Earth. There are two types of cloning; reproductive cloning and therapeutic cloning. Reproductive cloning will force America to deal with situations that they have never encountered before, such as new diseases and loss of food, water, money, and jobs; while therapeutic cloning allows scientists to study the human body in depth without hurting anyone and it allows for transplants to be done without the harm of another person. For these reasons, I am against reproductive cloning in the United States.

Your dog dies, and your mom offers to get you a new one, but you don't want a new dog, you don't want a new dog like your old dog, you want your old dog. Cloning isn't the right answer, it's expensive, the clones are different from the original, and cloning doesn't always go the way scientists want it to.

Thanks to modern medicine and scientific research, cloning is a reality and no longer science fiction. We may great advancements to Sam cell research as well, leading to cures for diseases. All of this is very different though from what Victor Frankenstein tried when he built the monster.

Human beings have inhabited the Earth for virtually only a fraction of a second of the planet’s existence. In this regard, our presence seems miniscule and insignificant. However in this “blink of an eye”, we have brought extensive and unforgivable destruction to our planet. The problems we now face are complex and many: global warming, the pollution of air and water, species extinction, deforestation, water depletion, oceanic dead zones, chronic diseases, poverty, world hunger (and on the opposite side of the spectrum of wealth, obesity), and violence to people and animals. Corruption and greed dictate the ebbs and flows of money, and little is being done to reverse the consequences. A Cree Indian prophecy reads, “Only after the last tree

Increase in genetic knowledge has created challenges in our society. Daniel Callahan focuses on these challenges and expresses his worry about the society (soil) on which this genetic knowledge is growing. Callahan asks the question of what kind of society (soil) is most likely be hazardous and introduces three patterns: 1) societies that demonize death and illness; 2) those societies that want to find biological solutions to social problems; and 3) societies with postmodern theory that there is no common social good, only a plurality of individual goods. In his essay Callahan is concerned about what kind of society we out to be and become before genetic technology can be used. I will use Callahans argument

Can you imagine living among species that have been long gone like the dinosaurs? It's a reality that scientists are trying to make happen with a procedure called cloning. Cloning is a process in which a part of DNA in an organism is extracted and is used to replicate the organism. Cloning has brought up a controversy whether or not cloning is worth its risks. But why should it be allowed? Humans and animals already reproduce and cloning is just another step forward with that. Cloning should be allowed.

When looked up on Google i hear well spoken thoughts on you. After reading your background and what made you into who you are today made me realize that you are a well spoken person. This letter is in regards of passing a bill on cloning. Cloning is when person is basically replicated. This is not always the case because the experiment can also be done to animals. Pet owners choose to pay extra money to buy a pet that will be categorized as in the “superior breed”. I understand that you are a businesswoman and make decisions that will not only have an effect on you but the U.S. I hope that you take this into consideration and let my words help make a positive impact to the communities throughout the U.S.

In 1997, the first clone of a sheep named Dolly was created. This embryo had a success rate of one to four percent. When applied to humans, this percentage may decrease and become lower and more unpredictable. With lives at stake, is it worth the risk of the embryos involved in the unstable process? Although cloning may allow for new medical procedures and research of diseases and cures, it takes away from the natural biological order of life, and allows humans to "play God" while creating a margin of error which could result in many defects.

Have you ever heard of cloning before? Well it has a lot of ups and its downs, many people are against it and many are for it? In my paper you will hear and of the good things and the bad things that happen in cloning and you can decide if you think it is right or wrong.