Persuasive Essay On Cloning Pros And Cons

Now that we are advancing in technology very rapidly, people are starting to wonder if it would be beneficial to clone humans. Some people say that you can literally save a person's life and create an exact replica of person by cloning. But some people say it’s not humane and it would be weird if there is 2 of the exact same person in the world. People are also concerned because nobody knows how these clones will act. We don’t know if the host will be harmed and we also don’t know if the clones will become evil and destroy the world. I believe that we shouldn’t clone humans simply because we don’t have enough information on cloning.

There are some people that have been very anxious with cloning because they believe it is something new, but in reality it was introduced in the 1950s. It started with cloning food and has moved onto cloning animals. It has been successful on many different cases and a famous one is the cloning of a sheep named Dolly. Dolly lived to be six and a half years old and she had six kids. People believe that cloning should be illegal but we believe that scientists should clone endangered or extinct species in order to preserve them, here’s why.

Can you imagine living among species that have been long gone like the dinosaurs? It's a reality that scientists are trying to make happen with a procedure called cloning. Cloning is a process in which a part of DNA in an organism is extracted and is used to replicate the organism. Cloning has brought up a controversy whether or not cloning is worth its risks. But why should it be allowed? Humans and animals already reproduce and cloning is just another step forward with that. Cloning should be allowed.

As soon as you mention the word cloning, you are most likely engendering a cyclopean debate. The reason for this is because people are immensely divided on whether or not cloning is a positive technological advance or a negative one. One way to come to any type of conclusion when it comes to this controversial topic of discussion is to visually examine cloning from an ethical, jeopardy, and religious perspective. The rigorous authenticity people need to realize as well as accept is, cloning is unethical, very precarious, and irreligious.

The term “Cloning” has, over time, come to encompass a number of sciences and biotechnologies that have emerged from technology developed while aiming for the main and original goal of cloning itself, ie “to propagate as a clone” or “to make an identical copy” of a living organism, which is the actual definition of cloning per se. The main cloning technologies can be put into three categories, Reproductive, Therapeutic and Genetic cloning.

The idea of cloning has been around for a long time. The possible benefits it could bring to both mankind and other life on Earth. However, the morality and ethics of doing just this have only more recently filter to the surface. How can cloning help or hurt?

Recently there has been a bill that would allow the use of taxpayers money to fund both therapeutic and reproductive cloning research of all humans and animals. Many people have suffered accidental medical tragedies during their lifetime. Read about a girl who needs a kidney, a burn victim, a man who lost his leg due to cancer. All of these victims favor cloning and want science to proceed. This is why I want you, Andy Vidak to vote yes on the bill for cloning. Cloning really does help those people who suffered from medical tragedies. Cloning can change many lives, if we do proceed, cloning may be able to cure cancer if cloning if cloning leads to a better understanding of cell differentiation. Rumors say cloning may also lead to a cure for heart attacks, a revolution in cosmetic surgery, organs for organ transplantation, and predictions abound about how cloning technology will save thousands of lives. Many can benefit from this bill and will save many lives. In result people are willing to let cloning continue for those who really need it.

At one point in every person’s life there is always a time crunch. Many people often say, “Man, I wish I could be two places at once! Life wouldn’t be such a rush then.” These people are referring to an exact copy of themselves, a clone. Clones are organisms that are exact genetic copies. Every single bit of their DNA is genetically identical to the original organism (What is Cloning?). When thought about, cloning an organism sounds like something out of fiction books. In reality, it is very simple. Take an egg cell from a donor, change the nucleus to one donated by the ‘clonee’, and give it to the surrogate mother. Bam, an exact replica. A question is, however, if it is that easy to clone something, why don’t we do it all the time? The answer is, laws prevent this, but an even bigger setback is that it is against most human beliefs, that it is immoral. Most ideas for cloning are pretty gruesome; farms of clones donating organs for transplants. Providing stem cells for people who cannot make their own. Testing medicine on them instead of humans. No wonder people classify this as ‘unethical.’ Although this is outlawed and as bad as it seems, this could be a real advance in human society (ironic, because cloning is considered inhumane). Life spans could

Dolly the sheep, was the first animal cloned successfully by scientist, Ian Wilmut at the Roslin Institute in Edinburgh, Scotland. Scientists cloned to mainly see if they could replicate the sheep without inbreeding. Cloning has a great advancement in our society, medical, and scientific researches. It shows that we have many more advancements coming in the future with cloning. Cloning for research should be used for these three main reasons: use of cloning through medicine, cloning to have healthy livestock, and using cloning of animals to see how it affects drug production.

The first problem that human cloning encounter is it is one of unethical processes because it involves the alteration of the human genetic and human may be harmed, either during experimentation or by expectations after birth. “Cloning, like all science, must be used responsibly. Cloning human is not desirable. But cloning sheep has its uses.”, as quoted by Mary Seller, a member of the Church of England’s Board of Social Responsibility (Amy Logston, 1999). Meaning behind this word are showing us that cloning have both advantages and disadvantages. The concept of cloning is hurting many human sentiments and human believes. “Given the high rates of morbidity and mortality in the cloning of other mammals, we believe that cloning-to-produce-children would be extremely unsafe, and that attempts to produce a cloned child would be highly unethical”, as quoted by the President’s Council on Bioethics. Since human cloning deals with human life, it said to be unethical if people are willing to killed embryo or infant to produce a cloned human and advancing on it. The probability of this process is successful is also small because the technology that being used in this process is still new and risky.

Scientist have stated that cloning animals is a lot harder than expected. After reading this your perspective of wanting cloning to be allowed might change.

The cloning of humans is now very close to reality, thanks to the historic scientific breakthrough of Dr. Ian Wilmut and his colleagues in the UK. This possibility is one of incredible potential benefit for all of us. Unfortunately the initial debate on this issue has been dominated by misleading, sensationalized accounts in the news media and negative emotional reactions derived from inaccurate science fiction. Much of the negativity about human cloning is based simply on the breathtaking novelty of the concept rather than on any real undesirable consequences. On balance, human cloning would have overwhelming advantages if regulated in a reasonable way. A comprehensive ban on human cloning by a misinformed public would be a sorry

Most people have the intuitive sense that there is something immoral and wrong about the cloning of humans. I believe that it is an inhumane violation of the natural order of nature to clone humans, and our society will not benefit if research on this topic is continued. Scientists should be focusing their research on more important issues, like curing cancer or mass purifying water in third world countries. By cloning human beings, we would be viewing children, and people in general, as objects that can be designed and manufactured to perform specific tasks, which would essentially lead to creating slaves and/or weapons. I am going to prove to you that cloning humans would violate the natural order of nature, and further research

Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic

Have you ever heard of cloning before? Well it has a lot of ups and its downs, many people are against it and many are for it? In my paper you will hear and of the good things and the bad things that happen in cloning and you can decide if you think it is right or wrong.