Persuasive Essay On Crime Control

Police brutality is a very widespread topic through all religions, all kinds of different cultures and all races. People believe that police officers use their powers and their badge to hold them to a higher standard then the average civilian. I belief that its all up to interpretation and the many experiences we go through that define a bad cop from a good one. If we judge all police officers from one bad cop how do we expect to change? Its a never ending cycle that has to change and heres some examples on how we can do so.

The American Criminal Justice System are sets of agencies and process made by the government to control crime and to penalize those who commit it. The justice system is different based one’s jurisdiction, meaning city, state, federal or tribal government or military installation. The Criminal System is divided into two main parts, the state and the federal. The state portion handles crimes within its state boundaries. The federal portion handles crime committed on Federal property or in two or more states (“Criminal Justice” 1). The American Criminal Justice System needs reform because of its emphasizes on incarceration punishment rather than Rehabilitation. Our justice system especially enforces punishment on blacks and Latinos resulting of overpopulation of prisons like Rikers Island for petty crimes. Also, another reform needed the juvenile cases. For example, juveniles who commit petty crimes shouldn’t be sent to adult prison and shouldn’t be near more dangerous and serious inmates.

In Bryan Stevenson's book “Just Mercy”, he discussed how many people are put on death row. He is a real lawyer who had to deal with inmates who were put on death row even if they said they were innocent. It made him realize how bad our criminal justice system is. Injustice, racism, and socioeconomic statuses were the main huge reasons why some were executed. Wealthy, poor, having no criminal records or having a few; there will always be discrimination towards those who are black.

In the last few years, many would agree that incidents police brutality, especially towards those of the black community, have spiked. There have been countless reports of innocent people being beaten or shot by the police, those who are supposed to serve and protect us. Recently, athletes have been taking a knee to peacefully protest the mistreatment of minorities in America, especially by police. There has been an uproar about why it is wrong and disrespectful. That is not the case. Athletes have the right to take a knee because of how detrimental it is to our society, but also because most people have personal experience with discrimination.

Dr. Seuss addresses various social issues through his children’s books. Horton Hears a Who, published in 1954, targets discrimination against minorities. The Sneetches, published in 1961, takes aim at racism. In the story, Plain-Belly Sneetches are discriminated against because they lack a star, which signifies higher social status in their Sneetch community. Unfortunately, Seuss’ children’s story parallels contemporary society. Recently, children in the United States have experienced horrible mistreatment by law enforcement. In order to subdue misbehaving elementary school students, campus security guards and the police, who tend to be white in most cases, resort to extreme measures like handcuffs. Disabled African American children are often subjected to such abuse. They receive more severe, traumatizing punishments based on their skin color; they do cause disturbances and should face the consequences of their actions, but such force should not be used. Although these children can and should be handled in a less humiliating fashion, law enforcement accepts criminal punishments as a reasonable way to restrain African American children because their skin color makes them less than human and a greater threat.

Many people believe police officers do not have the right to use force when apprehending an individual. Therefore, it is critical that officers make sure that they are performing their duty per the departments policy, before using lethal or non-lethal force to apprehend an individual, which may be classified as police brutality by society. An officer makes a pledge to protect and serve the community for which they are employed. Every time an officer is dispatched to a call there is a sense of uncertainty of what they will encounter. With technology at our fingers tips videos surface which may or may not capture the onset of an officers contact with a suspect. Which results in the media portraying police brutality happening more than it actually does. Many people are quick to judge an officers use of force to apprehend an individual who is not complying with the officers orders, as abusing their powers and police brutality. However, there are laws and regulations that grant officers the right to use the amount of force necessary to apprehend an individual. California Penal Code 835(a) states, “Any peace officer who has reasonable cause to believe that the person to be arrested has committed a public offense may use reasonable force to effect the arrest, to prevent escape or to overcome resistance. A peace officer who makes or attempts to make an arrest need not retreat or desist from his efforts by reason of the resistance or threatened resistance of the person being arrested; nor shall such officer be deemed an aggressor or lose his right to self defense by the use of reasonable force to effect the arrest or to prevent escape or to overcome resistance.” (penal code book). Police officers are judged and criticized for using deadly force, because it is believed that officers are meant to serve and protect, not cause harm to others. Getting an exact number of individuals who die as a result of deadly force employed by police officers, is difficult. However there are genuine and authentic sources that can help provide an estimate of deaths caused by law enforcement officers. For example, The CDC Mortality Report and The FBI Uniform Crime Report are responsible for keeping a record of the number of individuals

Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen, I am here to talk about gun control in America. It is one of the most controversial and intractable issues in America. It is a topic of discussion that is very much still in debate today. I strongly believe that guns are an absolute menace to America. Today, I will tell you why better gun control laws must be enforced immediately and prove that America would be a much better, safer place to live in with stricter gun restrictions and rules.

When committing a crime with a hand gun is considered Aggravated Assault with a Deadly Weapon by committing regular assault while using or exhibiting a deadly weapon. The highest level of punishment for person who commits a crime utilizing a handgun in Texas, is typically a second-degree felony, punishable by 2 to 20 years in the state penitentiary and a fine up to $10,000. However, this offense is a first-degree felony punishable by 5 years to life if it meets any one of the following conditions, causes serious bodily injury and involves a deadly weapon and family and dating violence, committed by or against a public servant on official duty, committed in retaliation against a witness, prospective witness, informant, or someone who reported a crime, committed against an on-duty security officer or is a drive-by shooting that causes serious bodily injury to any person. Appeals choose to review your case or not so they exercise an optional review, also the only cases that the court must hear are those that involve sentencing decisions in capital punishment cases and other cases involving liberty issues and all cases that result in the death penalty are automatically directed to the Court of Criminal Appeals from the trial court level. Local government could lower down gun violence by dealing with public carrying that covers urban cities and populated rural areas like putting some restrictions so it makes it hard for any illegal uses of guns happen in any public area.

There are many challenges that law enforcement agencies faces when it comes to enforcing public safety at the same time protect the rights of individuals. This paper will focus on several key topics involving the relationship between public safety and individual rights. The first topic is the statutory authority and responsibilities of government officials, security personnel, and private citizens. The next topic involves the practices or laws relating to search, seizures, and surveillance by police, corrections, private citizens, and security personnel. This paper will also compare the laws relating to the use of

According to CopCrisis.com, “taxpayers spend almost two billion dollars annually as a result of police misconduct” ("Every 8 Hours, Cops Kill an American Citizen). It is evident that this number is extremely too high. In actuality, this number should not exist at all. By conducting fully detailed investigations, accessing every aspect of all cases, police officers can carry out the goals of the crime control model, while granting an individual his or her due process rights.

Imagine you are a teen walking down the street with a friend. Now imagine being surrounded by police and getting searched for something that is not there. Since the item in question can not be placed the accuser changes their story; After multiple versions of what allegedly happened the police arrest you and your friend. Due to having a history of theft, a judge charges you with second degree robbery, even though there is no evidence to prove any wrong doing. Thinking the justice system will come through, and knowing your innocence, a trial is requested. Bail is set and cannot be paid due to economic hardship. Another consequence of not having money for bail, is there is also no money for a private attorney. A public defender, who has to many cases to keep straight, is assigned to help defend in court, yet he is trying to lessen his load and recommends several times that a plea deal is the best option that should be taken, even in the case of innocence. Picture holding out hope that if the case could just go to trial all would come to light. Four years pass by, mostly spent in solitary confinement, where the harsh circumstances begin to take a toll, mentally and physically. Imagine conditions so horrible, death seems better than enduring another day. Now picture the day for “justice” is finally here. No sooner does court get started it ends. The case gets thrown out due to the person who started all of this not being present. All the suffering that has been endured,

The touchstone of our criminal justice system must be reasonableness. The rights of the accused are enumerated in our country's founding document and have become a bedrock of our criminal justice system. See U.S. Const. Amends. 4, 5, 6, & 14. E.g., Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961); Miles v. United States, 103 U.S. 304 (1880). Those fundamental rights consequently, and rightly, impose high burdens on government officials, such as police officers and prosecutors. See U.S. Const. Amend. 4 (enumerating individuals’ freedoms from unreasonable searches and seizures and setting forth the warrant requirement); Miles, 103 U.S. 304 (stating the government must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases). However, those high burdens must not be unreasonable ones as those officials have very important duties in our society and they must be able to effectively carry out those duties in order to keep our society safe. See Michigan v. Bryant, 562 U.S. 344, 346 (2011) (articulating police

With so much that has transpired recently involving law enforcement and the citizens that they are sworn to protect and serve. There are many questions along with different controversial views on the roles of policing. The roles of policing are a very complex and at times can become very controversial depending on the laws and different induvial ways of thinking. In this paper, I will attempt to point out and discuss several roles of policing. Before talking about anything first, the understanding and clarity to what policing really means. By tradition, most people think of police usually as having the responsibility to responding to crimes after it has already taken place and, therefore are organized to support regular patrols, be speedy

During the Theory and Practice of Law enforcement I have learned many new and interesting information pertaining to our law enforcement in the United States. Among this new information is the clarification of what the role of law enforcement in the United States is now compared to that of their role in previous eras. Today the police’s role is not merely to protect and serve our society, but many differing various roles that help society with everyday routine and structure. Through this course I have also learned a number of strategies which will help the police reach their goals of their particular roles they strive to achieve. I have learned about the tactics that the police use in order to achieve their goals. Finally I have gotten a general idea about the current strategies of the police and the effects on society through the tactics used to reach their goals of their roles. The future of policing should focus on the roles of “handling” all situations that arise, use of force, and use of discretion, which can all be accomplished through the strategies of crime analysis, problem-oriented policing, along with tactics of communication and technology.

Can you image America without the hep of police or government in general? Today, people judge police as terrible people who just are blood thirsty for someone to kill. They do not look at the bright side of what police do. They protect, serve, and support their community and yet people still treat them like trash. They must establish fear to be respect. What would the world truly be like if we did not have police officers trying to protect their community?