Persuasive Essay On DonT Be Cruel

Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the necessity to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.

Imagine being born, only to live a life of torture. You are brought to a lab, and cruelly tested on against your will. Toxins poured into your eyes, painful injections to your skin, then left to die when you’re no longer useful. Although many do not realize it, people use products tested on animals in their everyday lives. For girls, many of your favorite makeup brands, such as Estee Lauder, Makeup Forever, and Maybelline take part in animal testing. Products such as toothpaste, cologne, deodorant, laundry detergent, razors, and even band-aids aren’t tested innocently, either. As a makeup enthusiast, I am passionate about how the products I use daily are tested. Today I will help you understand what animal testing is and how it started, how it’s currently affecting animals around the world, and what organizations are doing to help make a difference in the future. To begin, I will explain the history of animal testing. An animal test is any scientific experiment or test in which a live animal is forced to undergo something that is likely to cause them pain, suffering, distress, or lasting harm.(https://www.crueltyfreeinternational.org/why-we-do-it/what-animal-testing) Animal experiments are not the same as taking your animal to the vet. Animals used in laboratories are harmed, not for their own good, and usually killed at the end of an experiment. Animal experiments include injecting or force feeding animals with potentially harmful substances, exposing animals to radiation,

Millions of animals suffer due to effects of testing they must endure. This testing is usually done unethically and causes major harm. It’s wrong to harm animals for the sake of testing products for society. Furthermore, animals are living creatures just like humans and should not be treated differently. While testing animals may be cheaper, it is morally wrong and causes many harmful side effects in animals.

There are many pro and cons with the matter. A pro may be considered to be that “Animal testing has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments,” according to an article. A con can be considered to be that “Animals can suffer like humans do, so it is speciesism to experiment on them while we refrain from experimenting on humans.” (Should Animals be used for Scientific or Commercial Testing? 2017) Using animals can cause scientist to use misleading information and avoid finding cures, just because drugs pass tests on animals doesn’t mean that it is safe for humans to use either. Even though the human body anatomy is occasionally closer to the test subjects doesn’t mean that the results are accurate. This is taking advantage of animals when scientist use misleading information to do more test on

Numerous years ago, animal testing was started to help humans obtain information. The process of testing on animals is, quite possibly, one of the most disturbing experiments ever performed. Many cosmetics and personal care products are manufactured every year and put into the market

For many years there has been a controversial debate on whether or not animals should be used as test subjects for human cosmetics. The debate has two major sides Pro-animal testing and Anti-animal testing. Both sides have many valid points and this is one of the major reasons the debate is still ongoing many years after it began. The Pro- animal testing side argues the usefulness of animal testing for ensuring the progression and comfort of human development. The Anti-animal testing side argues that not only is animal testing unreliable, it is also cruel and unnecessary. While there is a plethora of reasons animal testing should be banned, the three primary reasons are it is unreliable and incompatible with humans, it is cruel and harsh for

Annually, one hundred to two hundred thousand animals suffer and possibly die due to testing for cosmetic reasons. (5) Animal testing was invented in the 1930’s when scientific technology wasn’t as advanced. Since then, cruel and painful tests have been performed on animals to test cosmetics. (1) Technology and science are more advanced now and alternative testing sources have become available. However, cosmetic companies continue to use animal testing for cosmetics even though it is outdated and unreliable. While animal testing is banned in some countries, some believe that it should be illegal for cosmetic companies worldwide to use animal testing. Not only is it is cruel and painful to the animals, reactions on animals may not be the same

Millions of animals are being unneedlessly tested on for cosmetics, even though there are plenty of alternatives available and most of the results are unreliable or not applicable to humans. Although the fight against animal testing has made huge progress recently, America has yet to stop this cruel practice and chooses to torture animals while other countries are making a stop to the testing (“Animal Testing 101”).

The cosmetic industry is a multi-billion dollar industry worldwide, catering to both men and women. Cosmetics seem to be so pervasive that everywhere you look, you can find some sort of cosmetic advertisement or commercial. Considering this high demand for cosmetics, many companies strive to produce products that will satisfy the consumer. However, in order for some cosmetic companies to manufacture their products, testing is conducted in the expense of animals. In the following report, we will examine many of the adversities that are associated with animal testing while offering some recommendations on how to remedy this issue.

Many people believe that animal testing is cruel and unnecessary, but I think that it’s extremely important. Animals should be used for commercial and scientific testing because they are the most similar creature to humans, it also assures safety for humans before using the products and helps to find medical treatments.

While animal rights is a sensitive topic for many, most can agree that testing cosmetics on animals is inessential and unethical. Animal testing is a small but vital element of biomedical research and is ultimately unnecessary in relations to cosmetics. There is also a wide range of non-animal research techniques that, as well as being humane approaches to science, can be cheaper, quicker, and more effective. These alternatives prevent animals from suffering, and are more practical in general. Despite the controversy surrounding the subject and the many laws dictating safe guidelines for it, testing cosmetics on animals is wrong, and is a practice that should be abolished. Such groups as PETA, BUAV, and AALAS speak against companies that have tested cosmetics on animals for many years. Those groups oppose animal experimentation because of the raw cruelty of it and spread the word so every woman understands just which animal lives were sacrificed for the Foundation she’s smearing on her face every day. After all, there is nothing classy about watching a rabbit’s eyes

Although the opposition makes many points as to why they believe animal testing is necessary. The first argument usually made in favor of animal testing is that animals are so similar to humans that the test results give very valuable information about how a human would react to a product. It is believed that if we test a product on animals they will respond like humans would. This is not a certain fact, although animals may be very similar genetically, that is not a guarantee that an average 180 pound human will react the same as an average 20 gram lab mouse. No matter how many animals are tested it just cannot account for the numerous differences between humans and animals. This being said I don’t believe that animal testing ensures the safety of a product for human use. In fact in 2004 the FDA reported that 92 out of every 100 drugs that successfully passed animal trials went on to fail human trials ("More Compounds Failing Phase I"). Similarly it has also been reported that certain products that have successfully passed all animal testing have gone on to fail all human trials ("Want to Improve Medical Research? Cut Out the Animals!"). I am not trying to say that all of the past animal testing that has happened has been useless, but I would say that this eliminates the necessity of animal testing seeing as there is still some risk when a product gets to further trials and then possibly even to shelves for consumer

What do you know about animal testing? If you know what is animal testing, then are you with or against it? Animal testing is a process that has been happening for truly quite a while for different reasons, for instance, making therapeutic meds, choosing the risk of particular medications, insisting the security of a thing proposed for individuals, and other human administrations jobs. Because of animal testing, various cures and drugs to a blended sack of illnesses and diseases have been observed that may have for the most part continued plaguing humankind as the years progressed. Without request, animal testing has exhibited profitable on more than a few occasions all through history.

The creation of a new product, should not cause animals to suffer and die. Because humans want a new lip color or a new type of eyeliner, does not mean that numerous animals should be immensely tortured and at times to death. Many argue that in order to ensure the safety of a product, animal testing is necessary. However, in today’s scientific world, this is not true. Many people argue that animal testing is cheaper, but according to Consumers ' Research Magazine writer Beatrice Hunter, it costs 500,000 dollars per product to test something using animals, as opposed to alternatives, which cost on average 50 dollars per product.

When applying your mascara in the morning, do you think of the poor bunny that was tortured during the initial testing process? I would assume not, which is where the problem lies. Animals are subject to abuse in the creation of makeup products by many of the companies in the market today. Some companies use a variety of different animals, from rats to rabbits to rhesus monkey. Efforts against this paradigm are growing increasingly as animal cruelty has become more of a popular and pressing issue to advocates in today’s society, and as the makeup industry continues to explode. An industry enjoyed by many makeup enthusiasts should not have such dark and horrid conditions behind it. As an avid makeup user and animal rescuer myself, I even fail to realize the true harm behind makeup testing. Although products in the market must be safe for consumers to use, the testing process does not need to require the use of poor, innocent animals. If the government cannot eliminate animal testing as a whole, makeup companies must have stricter testing regulations and labeling guidelines. We as consumers need to be more educated of the horrors that go into the creation of their favorite products, and the makeup companies need to be accountable for spreading this message.