Research Paper On Drunk Driving

According to this study, nearly all drivers were intoxicated and admitted. If all drivers were forced into a jail cell, there would be shrinkage in both fatalities and automobile accidents. In fact, “Almost half of all drivers who were killed in crashes tested positive for drugs and also had alcohol in their system” (Johnston, O'Malley, Bachman, and Schulenberg 1). So why should any offender remain free? According to “Drunk Driving Accident Statistics”, “Three in every ten Americans will be involved in an alcohol-related crash at some point in their lives” (5). To guarantee the safety of innocent people on the road, all offenders must go to jail immediately.

Drinking and driving is said to be the primary contributor to automotive related deaths. “By law, a driver is considered to be impaired by alcohol if his or her blood alcohol content is 0.08 percent or higher” (Holzmueller). As a matter of fact, “in 2010, about 86 percent of all fatalities alcohol-involved crashes were in cases where a driver or pedestrian had a BAC of .08 or higher” (“The Economic and Societal Impact of Motor Vehicle Crashes, 2010” 147). Laws and penalties have been created and applied in recent years that make it more difficult to get away with drinking and driving. If drivers are charged with alcohol-impaired driving, “they face suspension or revocation of their license” (Holzmueller).

In the instance of drunk driving, the actions of the drunk driver are related to the safety of the drivers within their proximity and therefore affects not only the driver but others as well. Our previous moral experiences allow us to determine what the intentions of the drunk driver might be. Some drivers may choose to drive under the influence of alcohol because they have had an emergency that requires them to be at a certain place and they do not have the means to reach to their destination except for driving themselves. In this case, the context becomes complicated and intricate. However, if the driver is risking his own and other drivers’ safety, it becomes clear that their intentions are based on nonchalance and disregard for others.

Driving under the influence has affected many people's lives and families. Today I would like to talk to you about the problems of drinking and driving, and why it is a concern for all of us. Driving under the influence is one of the most common and dangerous situations you can put yourself or someone else in. The fact is that drinking and driving is a huge deal and can leave a long trail of broken dreams and hearts. If you drink and drive, not only are you putting yourself at risk, but your passengers and the pedestrians outside of your vehicle. According to the most recent statistics by the National Commission Against Drunk Driving states that 17,000 Americans die each year in alcohol- related traffic crashes and 600,000 Americans

The facts are plain and simple, that alcohol and driving do not mix. About three in every ten Americans will be involved in an alcohol related crash at some time in their lives. Every single injury and death caused by drunk driving is totally preventable. To curb this national travesty, concerned Americans need to examine the problems, the effects, and the solutions to drunk driving. First of all, America has had a problem with drunk driving since Ford perfected the assembly line. Alcoholism is a problem in and of itself, but combined with driving can have a wide range of effects. The consequences of this reckless behavior can include a first time DUI or licenses suspension; a small fender bender, or worst of all a deadly crash. Most

Introduction: long ago the government banned the ability to make alcohol. This has caused a huge uproar which then people started to boot legging, as more and more people started to drink in the safety of their own homes. After the government saw how people were protesting this new law, they decided that they should left the ban. Since then people were able to drink in public, which in return has created another issue, now that they are drunk at a bar, how do they get home. Rather than taking the safe option and utilize some of the state and local programs and call a tow truck, the Driver chooses to just drive how drunk. They think that it’s ok, since they do not have their full mind.

As to my own part, having turned my thoughts for many years, upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the several schemes of our projectors, I have always found them grossly mistaken in their computation. It is true. There are not enough drivers who drive under the influence. In the year 2001, MADD Online approximated that only one in ten drivers, a mere 25 million, drove drunk, and, consequently these drivers were the ones significantly more likely to be involved in a crash of some sort, but why shouldn’t we level the playing field? (1)

In the year 2000, M.A.D.D. was nationally recognized for supporting the law that the legal limit of driving while intoxicated should be lowered from .10 to .08. The law was passed in 2005 by congress all throughout the United States, making the chance of an intoxicated person driving and injuring themselves or others much lower. Also, as the result of lobbying and M.A.D.D.’s efforts in changing the law, the state of California also passed a law that enhanced the penalties and fines for re-offenses of DUI charges as well as prevented minors from purchasing alcohol. Five different bills have been signed to add weight to the DUI charges, as well as prevent minors from obtaining fake ID’s by cracking down on security measures and rules in liquor stores. In the state of Rhode Island, M.A.D.D. is spreading the petition to encourage the police to enforce sobriety checkpoints. They argue that the checkpoints are a

A solution for eliminating drunk driving may be accomplished with an Ignition Interlock Device for detecting alcohol consumption. Although, some states incorporate the mandatory installation of such a device, it is usually with repeat offenders. Should more states enact this device with first time offenders, it may be a win-win situation for all parties involved.

One of the positions that MADD holds concerning enforcement of anti-drunk driving legislation is the use of sobriety checkpoints and high visibility enforcement. As is stated on the “MADD’s Positions on Enforcement” page, “MADD supports the frequent and regular use of highly publicized sobriety checkpoints and other high visibility enforcement programs to detect and apprehend alcohol and other drug impaired drivers, and as a visible deterrent to drinking and driving” (MADD). However, there is some concern when it comes to this tactic which could undermine the status of MADD, such as Kenneth H. Beck’s evaluation of “Maryland’s anti0drunk driving program, Checkpoint Strikeforce.” From this study’s examination of the first three years of the

U.S. Department of Transportation. "About Drunk Driving." MADD - About Drunk Driving. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 25 Jan. 2011. Web. 23

The findings were then shared in The American Journal Public Health in March. This is in conjunction with the Mothers Against Drunk Drivers Organization, which has been pleading with states to create such a law, requiring ignition locks, since 2008.

Drunk driving is a serious offense that not only effects the drunk driver, but also the people around the drunk driver. Drunk driving causes serious accidents that often end with someone being seriously injured, or killed. There are many ways to prevent drunk driving from license suspension to incarceration. Another way to prevent drunk driving is to rehabilitate the drunk driver by initiating the ignition interlock device. This device is installed in a vehicle of a driving while intoxicated (DWI) offender to prevent them from driving while drunk. Society pushes for states to have harsher punishments for DWI offenders, however, a more rehabilitative stance should be taken with the ignition interlock device because it prevents DWI offenders from driving while intoxicated, it enables DWI offenders to still be able to drive to maintain their responsibilities and practice safe driving habits, and it reduces recidivism rates among DWI offenders.

The organization MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) was formed in the nineteen eighties and has been trying to spread the message to people of all ages that “impaired driving is unacceptable and criminal” (About MADD: History, 2017, p. 1). They use their platform as a way to reach out to victims of this crime and end drunk driving. This campaign has four initiatives to make a change. The first one is to support more high visibility law enforcement, such as DUI checkpoints. If drivers know there is a high chance of them getting caught, they are less likely to do it. The second vision they wish to be enforced is ignition interlocks or in-car breathalyzers for all convicted drunk drivers. Along the lines of this and projecting more into the future, the third desire is advanced vehicle technology. A breath/touch sensor would be inserted in cars to ensure the driver’s blood alcohol level is below point zero eight

Casualties implicate inebriated drivers decreased with ease during the 80s and 90s, Fell and Voas state that at the time, organizations alike Mother Against Drunk Driving or MADD was convey significantly a lot of consideration to the cause. This Research Paper interpret that “in 2006, MADD launched the Campaign to Eliminate Drunk Driving (CEDD), a multipronged attempt that focalize on high-visibility constraint, passage of laws to order all driving while intoxicated (DWI) offenders to appoint their vehicles with alcohol ignition interlocks and uphold for the development of advanced, in-vehicle alcohol detection systems that would intercept drivers from driving when over the legal limit for alcohol. This endeavor seeks to reform the spotlight for alcohol-impaired driving, which is still a major reason of motor vehicle fatalities, and in the end, eliminating the problem”. When MADD focused on the issue of drunk drivers it proceeds in a cluster of new laws, publicity and police enforcement, which along with other things, assist with the diminish of drunk drivers. Law enforcement made it essential to put efforts into and center on road safety issues, like seat belt uses, child passenger safety, air bag safety, aggressive driving, and more lately, distracted driving. Not all 50 states have an obligatory interlock laws, even though some courts and departments of motor vehicles must require them. MADD launched many activities focused on high-visibility drunk driving enforcement