Persuasive Essay On Eugenics

Eugenics essentially began as a good thing. Early genicists had the intention of improving the quality of the human population by selecting desired traits. Because of the limited knowledge available in the early nineteen-hundreds this approach to changing the gene pool seemed reasonable. The researchers believe that by controlling human “reproductive” conditions like mental retardation psychiatric illness and physical illness / disabilities could be destroyed. The scientific data to prove these statements would never surface.

The website pro-life.com is a grand depiction of pro-life standpoints such as Abortion, Euthanasia and assisted suicide, the death penalty, War, finite omission. This website depicts several negative ideas about abortion this it shows several articles and videos. The pro-life movement argues that a non-viable, undeveloped human life is sacred and sanctified the government. Spearheading this operation is the website prolife.com.

Lack of scientific knowledge about genetic biology was the primary reason why eugenics movement died out towards the latter half of the 20th century. It was concluded that there was actually no significant way to identify “fit” families. The eugenics movement unjustly called people unfit without reason. The primary downside to the eugenics movement in the United States is that scientist paid too much attention to the genetic correlations between class and genes, but rarely looked at the environmental factors that affected the class. Essentially what the eugenics movement did was called families that were alcoholics and thieves due to your genes. An argument could have been very easily made that these families were

Future eugenicists can extort their knowledge and use it to their advantage. Eugenics is an interesting subject that is co-dependent on society; the future holds great possibilities for acknowledgment in this field of science.

Pro-choice has been a major topic ever since the women’s movements started in the early 1970’s, a question sometimes asked is that, if part of the population are so pro-life and worry about protecting a fetus, how come when the child is conceived they suddenly bash at you for having that unwanted child anyways, and that is hypocritical. In this essay, details include would be why people choose to be pro-choice, NARAL Pro-Choice America, the battle for reproductive justice for women and their right to make decisions for their body, advocates that are pro-choice, proposals for a pro-choice government, and Tomi Lahren being fired for stating she was pro-choice.

Just think about a human race free of genetic disease where everyone is intelligent and where society and technology advance at staggering rates. This is the future that is envisioned by those who advocate eugenics. Eugenics is the study of methods to improve the human race by selection of parents based on their inherited characteristics (Hartl). The idea was first discussed by Sir Francis Galton in the 1880’s, but was widely unaccepted by people at first due to fear that it would take away their basic human rights and be misused (Hartl). In the early 20th century, eugenics was a very popular and widespread idea in the United States and there were laws created to encourage certain people to have children, while discouraging others from procreating (Morris 66). The main reason eugenics has fell into such disfavor is because the Nazis cited it as the reason for the Holocaust (Morris 66). The use of eugenics by the Nazis can be compared to the use Islam by ISIS, or the use of Christianity by the Westboro Baptist Church. It is a concept that can be misused based on interpretation and extremism. Eugenics itself is just an idea to improve the human race by selective breeding, not by killing millions. Forms of eugenics should be implemented in society because they eliminate genetic diseases and problems, spread favorable traits and attributes, create a more intelligent and less flawed society, and help advance the human race as a whole.

If parents were allowed to modify the genes of their children, there could be a cause of genetic overclass. There would be a definite line created in between the people whose parents changed their genes to create their own definition of perfection and then there would be the people whose family either did not want to or could not afford to genetically engineer their child's phenotypic traits. Not only that, it would also lead to homogenisation in society leading to a great drop in genetic diversity and also creating a disadvantage to anyone with a disability or deficiency of any kind. If anything, the inequality of people around the world would be greater than it already is today discriminating against the people that are not classified as “perfect”. Not only will eugenics create a heightened sense of inequality, it also creates the debate of what the definition of perfection actually

There is much bias and confusion surrounding the topic of eugenics. Many times the reason for this is the lack of understanding of what the term means, where it states “In 1883, Sir Francis Galton, a respected British scholar, and cousin of Charles Darwin, first used the term eugenics, meaning ‘well-born.’ (Genetics Generation, 2015).” This term has evolved to encompass more than just “well-born” as can be seen in the encyclopedia. “The eleventh edition of The Encyclopedia Britannica defines eugenics as ‘the organic betterment of the race through wise application of the laws of heredity.’ (Court, 2004).” The meaning of the word eugenics, due to the way it has been used, confuses many people.

The theory of Eugenics can be dated back all the way to 400 B.C. but was not popularized until the mid-1800s by an English scientist, Francis Galton. He researched and published the theory that aimed to improve the genetic quality of the human population through selective breeding (NC Office of Archives and History). As the half-cousin of Charles Darwin, Galton applied the Darwinism science (survival of the fittest) to heredity characteristics. Two types of Eugenics stemmed from the theory, positive and negative. Positive eugenics is encouraging the “best” people in the society based on financial and personal features to have more children while negative eugenics is picking people with flaws and defects from the population

Genetically modified babies Reduces risk of inherited medical conditions such as obesity, anemia, diabetes, cancer. Sometimes people with these conditions would rather not have kids just to avoid the risk of them developing the diseases. With the prevention of this conditions the human race would be superior since people wouldn’t be held back by things like obesity which renders people useless in certain activities especially physical ones.

Finally, I’ve read some stuff online and lots of people were saying “Don’t Play God,” towards genetic engineering. I believe those people are too short-sighted to understand the benefits of genetic engineering. I’ve also heard people say that genetic engineering is unethical but what’s unethical is leaving people ill just because we’re afraid that it’s “unnatural.” A lot of people could extremely benefit from the use of it. Infertility, crop shortages, diseases, you name it. All of these things can be avoided, if not eliminated completely by proper use of genetic engineering.

The definition of eugenics is to breed out undesirable traits. Based off of Austrian scientist Gregor Mendel’s studies, eugenics is accomplished through selective breeding. Dominant traits would replace recessive traits and the law of dominance would be ineffective. Originally, the idea behind eugenics was not completely bad. Over time though, problems surrounding it have been found. Dealing with positive and negative traits, questions have been asked about what constitutes as a negative trait and who decides which traits are

The roots of eugenics can be traced back to Britain in the early 1880’s when Sir Francis Galton generated the term from the Greek word for “well-born”. He defined eugenics as the science of improving stock, whether human or animal. According to the American Eugenics Movement, today’s study of eugenics has many similarities to studies done in the early 20th century. Back then, “Eugenics was, quite literally, an effort to breed better human beings – by encouraging the reproduction of people with "good" genes and discouraging those with "bad" genes.” (www.eugenicsarchive.org) According to Merriam-Webster, the modern day definition of eugenics is, a science that deals with the improvement (as by control of human mating) of

Human genetic engineering should be banned because it harms the human race since we would be reducing our genetic diversity through this radical process. Human genetic engineering simply eliminates the “undesirable” traits and encourages specific “desirable” traits. With the endless possibilities of choosing what to eliminate, inevitably the “desirable” traits are picked and chosen on whim decisions such as blonde hair, blue eyes, a slender figure, and tall height (Act For Libraries). According to the British Medical Journal, this idea of designing a baby based on cosmetics is called unrealistic and arbitrary standards of perfection (Caplan). Unrealistic and arbitrary standards of perfection will create identical genomes among humans. Obviously, there would be a tremendous drop in genetic diversity as a result of this. Moreover, when defective genes are replaced with functional genes inevitably, there is a reduction of genetic diversity and causes the human population, as a whole, to be more susceptible to disease and virus (Patra). As shown by this, the “undesirable’ traits are annihilated and “desirable” or functional genes in this instance are promoted. Although scientists for genetic engineering will promote the “eradication of genetic disorders and diseases,” once they are diminished to the best of their ability there would still be a yearn to “perfect” the human race. Instead of annihilating disease we would also be annihilating cosmetic traits we don’t want to see in

Genetic Engineering is the deliberate modification of the characteristics of an organism by manipulating its genetic material. Genetic modification has been around since about 12,000 BC, when humans first began to modify organisms. Genetic engineering as the direct transfer of DNA from one organism to another was first done by Herbert Boyer and Stanley Cohen in 1972. Genetic engineering can be a good thing and bad for a few reasons. Some good things are that genetic engineering can be used to cure diseases before a child is born, and that scientists can use it to take good genes from the parents to prevent diseases and disabilities that the parents may carry. Some bad things are that governments may use genetic engineering to create super soldiers and more intelligent humans, and that it will create a social divide with the more intelligent people with the normal people. These reasons divide people on whether genetic engineering is a good or a bad thing for humans. Genetic engineering is not only used in advancing humans or treating babies. Genetic engineering is now mostly used in medicines. Scientists use genetic engineering in making mass-production of insulin, human growth hormones, vaccines and many other drugs. Genetic engineering has been very successful in the past and scientists want to take things to the next level by trying to make these ‘super soldiers’ and ‘more intelligent’ people.