Persuasive Essay On Euthanasia

Euthanasia is a challenge from the ethical point of view and also from the legal. Some terminally ill patients ask to be left to die with dignity so their pains can disappear. Therefore, a dilemma for physicians and family members who must adopt a final decision is presented.

The definition of euthanasia from the Oxford Dictionary is: “The painless killing of a patient suffering from an incurable and painful disease or is in an incurable coma.” Consider the words “suffering,” “painful,” “irreversible” and “incurable.” These words describe a patients terrible conditions and prospects. Euthanasia is known as “mercy killing” for a reason, it is the most, humane, moral and logical form of treatment available to patients that have no hope in fully recovering. If you had to choose between lying in bed dying a slow and painful death, or dying a quick painless death at the time you choose so that you can be surrounded by all your loved ones, which would you choose? With euthanasia,

But, we can’t deny the fact that euthanasia can help the patient mentally and emotionally. Patients who request euthanasia may be requesting it because they are depressed and they want to end their sufferings and make their parents become relieved. Meanwhile, it can humanely end a patient’s suffering allowing them to die with dignity. Also, if the treatments and medicines are advanced, euthanasia would not have been practiced by doctors. Therefore, euthanasia can help to shorten the grief and suffering of the patient’s loved ones such as family and friends.

While the practice remains controversial universally, it begs the question, should a terminally ill patient or a patient with a low quality of life due to chronic pain be allowed to die on their terms? I will show how a utilitarian would argue that the suffering endured by the

“If I cannot consent to my own death, whose body is this?” famously said by Sue Rodriguez. Who was diagnosed with ALS in 1991 and given only a year to live. Expect Sue decided to fight, she wanted to die on her own terms. In 1993, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled 5-4 in that life sanctity was more important than a dignified death. She died soon after in early 1994. It was ruled as a doctor assisted suicide, but no charges were pressed. Around the world, people are victims of terminal illness, just like Sue. Their condition forces them to live in pain. Is it fair to go through all the sickness and discomfort just for the end result of death? Imagine if this were you or a loved one, living in pain and awaiting death. We should have control of our way of life and death when terminally ill. Euthanasia should be a legal right and recognized globally.

When we think about euthanasia, we usually think of putting down a pet such as a dog or a cat to relieve them of their misery. But what about humans? Shouldn’t a patient who is suffering with a terminal illness be granted the right to die peacefully? A terminal illness is an incurable disease where adequate treatment is not available, and the patient should expect death shortly after diagnosis. Even when treatment is involved, death will ultimately occur. People that have these diseases should be given more control over the fate of their lives. Currently, the only states in the US that allow assisted suicide are California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. Every state in the US should implement a death with dignity law into their legislation for competent patients. When patients are in incredible amounts of pain, they deserve the right to end their suffering, release the financial burden of medical bills, and maintain their human right to determine their fate through doctor assisted suicide.

Euthanasia or mostly known as assisted suicide is a practice that is illegal in majority of the states and countries. Euthanasia is a practice to end lives of terminally ill hospitalized patients to relieve suffering, so they do not have to experience the painful death of what sickness they may have (Euthanasia – Learn, 2017). The patient gets to choose either if they get to end their life or to go through with their sickness and die of the disease or natural cause. I believe that the patient should get to end their live whenever they want, only by the means of Euthanasia.

The debate over the use of euthanasia is ever growing. This is due to the fact of constant increases in medical advances. Medical advances are growing the number of medicines one can be given before palliative care is an option. The main concern of the debate is whether trying new treatments and medicines are necessary before palliative care is given. Two articles will be analyzed using the Aristotelian method. Both articles are valid, but the New York Times article written by Haider Javed Warraich offers a complete perspective using all three persuasive appeals compared to the article written by Terry Pratchett for The Guardian, which the majority is written on emotion.

The practice of euthanasia is not a new concept to civilized societies. Because of mankind’s desire to be empathetic to their fellow man, euthanasia is a practice that support humane acts that are compassionate. Over the past ten years, globally there has been a rise concerning the arguments of euthanasia and what benefits this act provide to the terminally ill. Because of the increase in being able to prolong life, issues like euthanasia has come to the forefront of when and where a person chooses to end their life. The introduction of palliative care, euthanasia is now considered a by-product of the many advances of health care to prolong life. Palliative care focuses on providing humane relief from the symptoms and stress of a serious illness. In terminal situations patients are denied by legislation the choice of euthanasia as a remedy for their situation. Many of the laws to deny the right to choose euthanasia is backed by religious and philosophical institutions that offer rhetoric as a premise on why euthanasia should not be allowed as an accepted medical practice. Because of this social block concerning euthanasia, there is a limitation for the ability for the terminally ill that are non-responsive to palliative care to choice death in a dignified manner. Scholars and philosophers are working with the medical community to find a reasonable accepted form of euthanasia that will align with social acceptance. There are many articles that support or refute the use of

“To save a man’s life against his will is the same as killing him” (Horace). Many individuals struggle every day from terminal illnesses. Not only does this affect the person directly, but also the family who is forced to watch their loved one deteriorate mentally and physically. Euthanasia is a way to end personal suffering by being given a high enough dose to reduce pain and eventually cause death. Through this process there is no pain, that the patient will just figuratively, fall asleep and pass away. With the wishes of the person hurting, they can be in control of a disease that is controlling them. A illness that controls so much of a patient life, being able to make the decision when they are able to take their life with euthanasia gives the power back to them in their final stages. Euthanasia should be legal in all fifty states so individuals can take charge of their own life. In majority of the countries euthanasia or assisted suicide is against the law, that is illegal to help somebody kill themselves, regardless of circumstances. Euthanasia is something that the government can control and the people in suffering want it. Not allowing someone to be able to take their own life, is taking away a right. This right is allowing you to choose what you get to do with your life.

Should someone who has a terminal illness, be subjected to intolerable pain and suffering for the days they have left? Scared, because they know that their body and mind will soon deteriorate into nothing. They will forget their friends and family; all of the fond memories they have will be gone. Their dignity and pride will be fractured by something they cannot change, their illness. Yet, there is a way for one to feel at peace with the hand that has been dealt to them, euthanasia. Euthanasia is mercy killing or assisted suicide. People should have the power to control what happens to their bodies. They shouldn’t be forced to suffer through unmanageable pain until their body finally decides to give up and die, it should be their choice. You do not get a choice to acquire a disease, but you can choose how, when and where you die. You should choose euthanasia because it alleviates the suffering you go through, it helps you decide if living is worth it, and states that it is your right to die.

In 1984, the Dutch Supreme Court announced euthanasia or mercy killing to be legal. Because the people in this country don’t want their loved ones to have prolonged suffering either physical or mental, so why not use euthanasia? In the early 20th century, euthanasia was used for the first in English and American. During the World War II the Nazis had used this process to kill people who were children, old people, or they do not strong enough to survive. In today’s society, if you talking with ten people about euthanasia, then you will hear lots of different opinions. The euthanasia issue has been discussed for many years, and it still has not been concluded. This paper is going to show you both sides of euthanasia. In my opinion, I think euthanasia is a good way for those people who are in the final stage because they can keep someone’s life, finish their suffering and extremely use their entitlement.

When someone chooses to help end another person’s life, is it right or wrong? It is a choice between ending a human life to release them from pain or misery, but live with the constant thought that someone lost their life as a consequence of a granted request; or watch , as the person continues to suffer and beg for their life to be taken away. It is a choice between going left, where nothing is right; or going right, where nothing is left. Euthanasia is the painless killing of a patient suffering from something incurable or an extremely painful disease. According to the National Health Service, euthanasia can be considered as manslaughter or murder and is punishable with up to life in prison; a serious crime in the United States, but is it just? Helping someone take his/her life own life away devalues human lives, presents religious and ethnical problems, and worst of all, corruption. There are numerous problems that can arise from allowing euthanasia. Ethnically, the topic can be argued. Biblically and lawfully, it cannot and should not.

Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing or assisted suicide, is the act of painlessly ending life in order to alleviate pain and suffering within a patient who has little to no hope of survival. In June 1997, the U.S. Supreme court unanimously ruled that there is neither a constitutional right nor a constitutional prohibition against euthanasia, thus the legality of euthanasia varies from state to state (Emanuel 142). As a whole, euthanasia is a very controversial topic in today’s society, and I feel as though various myths must be debunked and proven false before assumptions are made on the ethical and moral values a procedure such as this can have on those who are involved. Because euthanasia is such a severe procedure it is often associated with various pros and cons just as any type of medical procedure is, as all medical procedures have precautions; the overall goal of these procedures however, is to help alleviate pain and suffering in all patients who receive the necessary procedure. As for euthanasia, terminally ill patients are often killed and are unable to speak on behalf of themselves as to whether or not they wish to proceed with the procedure; because of this, however, euthanasia is often a very controversial procedure and is usually decided upon by the immediate family or medical faculty when applicable. Overall, I feel as though euthanasia is a procedure that has very high advantages that outweigh its disadvantages, and feel as though the procedure

Euthanasia is, by textbook definition, the painless killing of a patient suffering due to an incurable and painful disease or an irreversible coma. Euthanasia is not just death, but it is caused by what was done or what was not done to prevent death. Euthanasia, also called mercy killing or assisted suicide, it is currently legal in California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington; its status is still being disputed in Montana, however it is illegal in most countries across the world. Many people strongly oppose euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide as it questions the ethics and morality, but there are those who are in favor of it as it is a means of ending a life without pain.