Persuasive Essay On Freedom Of Privacy

Since the founding of the United States of America, freedom has been the basis of the governmental and ruling systems in place. Individual freedoms are protected in both the Bill of Rights and the rest of the Constitution, and Schwartz (2009) explains that ‘public liberty ultimately enhances collective rationality—it is a path to heightening our wisdom by increasing access to pertinent information and improving decision making’ (p. 409). However, there have been many times in history when the true freedom of citizens is called into question. There has always been controversy about how much power the government should have, who is keeping the government in check, and if citizens are properly informed about what their elected governed are doing. The passing of the Patriot Act in 2001 was no exception to this controversy. The

From the opening sentence of the essay, “We are free to be you, me, stupid, and dead”, Roger Rosenblatt hones in on a very potent and controversial topic. He notes the fundamental truth that although humans will regularly shield themselves with the omnipresent first amendment, seldom do we enjoy having the privilege we so readily abuse be used against us.

September 11, 2001 was the day where everything in America had changed. A series of four terrorist attacks destroyed the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. As a reaction to this, Congress passed the Patriot Act, severely limiting citizen’s civil liberties as promised by the Constitution. American’s civil liberties and constitutional rights cannot be denied and/or put into jeopardy to protect national security, for it goes against American ideals and may persecute non-partisan individuals, while allowing the executive branch to unconstitutionally abuse their power.

Being in the privacy of one’s home, gives you comfort, the means to say what you feel, or how you feel. What if someone was listening? Wouldn’t that be uncomfortable? Knowing everything said in one’s house is being heard, and the family inside of it has no clue. One’s house doesn’t seem so comfortable anymore does it? The U.S. Patriot Act violates many privacy and freedom rights given to you buy the bill of rights. The U.S. Patriot Act was written after 9/11 a tragic event in American history that eventually lead to the Afghanistan war. Although the Afghanistan war is over, the Act is still in place and has not been removed. The purpose of this essay is to inform the people of America that the U.S. Patriot Act rapes the nation of its rights.

Many people come to the United States looking for freedom and liberty and where their essential rights are protected under the Constitution. However, freedom should not be taken for granted as for every rule there may be limits. The First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” (Corwin 48). In other words, the First Amendment granted freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, and petition. The First Amendment is clear enough for anyone to comprehend and process easily; however, people sometimes misunderstand their rights by doing what their First Amendment right does not protect, especially when it comes to freedom of speech. Seven of the most important law cases in the United States’ history are what shaped the American’s society and allowed people to hopefully know and recognize their limits and restrictions when it comes to their speech whether it was a literal speech or a symbolic speech.

The freedom of speech is a part of the bill of rights-obviously important enough to be one of the first things mentioned. Just as it was important in 1771, our freedoms are well established today in 2015. Here in the age of technology, the internet is where the crime takes place and all could be victims. The founding fathers didn’t write the bill of rights concerned with our Facebook rants and who they can be directed to. So finding a solution to fit a 1771 document in today’s problems can be difficult.

In this paper I will describe the original intent of the freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will explain current views of the provisions of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, right to privacy, and criminals’ rights. I will assess which events and opinions have changed the intent of each of these provisions over time. I will evaluate the effects of Supreme Court decisions related to these provisions and express consideration for the future of these provisions.

Centuries ago in American society, individuals were not granted the free will to act and speak freely. First Amendment rights allowed citizens to do so. On a historical outlook, the oppressed fought for the rights of various groups in the United States. Although laws and situations evolve, groups in America continue to face inequality and issues with freedom of speech. There is room for further improvement; freedom for all citizens needs to be fulfilled. The impression of being free is what gives the United States the ideology of being a part of a democracy. Recent events have revealed issues with freedom of speech and questioning about what kinds of speech is protected. In order to close the gap in

In light of the attacks on the Charlie Hebdo Headquarters in early 2015, the topic of free speech seemed to regalvanize. This conversation will only pick up more momentum and fully convicted sentiments with the rise of social movements like the Black Lives Matter and Social Justice Warrior movements. Edward Morrisey writes his article, The Coming Demise of Free Speech in America, to share information regarding the first amendment, respective court cases, and the results of an implementation of a hypothetical ‘hate speech’ law.

After the attack on the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001, Americans learned to fear an entire group of people. President Bush addressed the nation stating, “Terrorist attacks can shake the foundations of our biggest buildings, but they cannot touch the foundation of America” (Bush). However, this statement was incorrect. Shortly after the nation fell into fear, Congress passed the Patriot Act, revoking the people’s rudimentary right to privacy. This act gave the government access to the people’s privacy in order to create an air of safety, an attempt to decrease the fear flooding the nation.

One of the key concepts of a democratic regime is the individual freedom, which is also referred as “American’s identity” in North America. Following this concept, in 1791, the first amendment was ushered into position on the United States Constitution, bringing the utmost protection for the liberty to establish, exercise religion, the freedom of expression, and the freedom of speech into existence. Apparently, this egalitarian nation has created a fair, rational opportunity for its citizens to form their opinions, thoughts without any fear, yet it also provides the right to make a speech without a discreet selection of words, potentially leading to disrespect, infliction of personal self-esteem, and even conflicts. One of the typical examples

How many apps have you used today, or how many websites have you visited? The answer is probably very many, some even without your knowledge. Behind the pixels of your phone or personal computer’s screen, thousands of bytes of data are being transmitted. Most of that data is what you’d expect: e-mail, texting, weather, games, and so on. Unfortunately there has been a growing problem over the last several years, and it’s not one that is obvious to the average internet user. Some of that sent data contains information which isn’t necessary, oftentimes it’s personal data. Your browsing habits, favorite games, most listened to music genres are being shared to advertising agencies for profit. Privacy is quickly vanishing from the internet and

“See you in court” has been the mantra often cried when a person feels their privacy has been violated, or their free speech infringed. When people take a legal cause of action against a party, they feel wronged them and sue them in court for damages, this is known as a tort (p. 110). Current laws seem to favor free speech above privacy rights. These complex legal issues are often viewed through a libertarian or authoritarian lens. When the internet came along it compounded the difficulty of these matters. In 1996, Congress passed the Communications Decency Act (CDA) in response to growing issues sprouting from the new medium, the internet. Privacy expert and law professor, Daniel J. Solove addresses these complex legal issues in chapters

Every man and woman is born with the same liberties, which are guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. This document entails the instances when the government can take away your fundamental rights according to the law. The Supreme Court case Schenck v. United States exemplifies civil liberties as it further defines the freedom of speech. In 1919, Charles Schenk handed out pamphlets to the public expressing negative feelings towards the military draft and even encouraged people to take action to disobey the process. He was then charged under the espionage act. The court decided that Schenck went outside of the legal limits on the freedom of speech. They used the term ‘clear and present danger’ to express that the freedom of speech is no longer relevant when it promotes dangerous behavior or endangers the nation’s interests. Although this case dates back to the early twentieth century, this decision still remains relevant today. In particular, social media presents more of a danger in the world as people have greater access to speak their minds freely. When harmful material is put on the internet that causes devastating results such as teen suicide, this limit on freedom of speech is still relevant as the term ‘clear and present danger’ can be applied. The decision reached in this case has had a large impact on the nation and especially on the younger generations, including myself, as social media is becoming a greater problem in regard to freedom of speech. 1 Although civil liberties play an important role in American society, civil rights have a greater impact.

Privacy in the 21st century is constantly violated. Any life, or even your own life, could potentially be in danger by sharing locations accidentally, which could change one’s future. Such danger might be due to location services, which anyone can be easily found. On Snapchat, Facebook, and Instagram applications, people can be tracked by using their whereabouts which are easily accessible. GPS locations can be hacked, leading one to dangerous situations such as encountering physical harm. Once again, due to advanced technologies in the 21st century, our society faces major challenges due to public access putting privacy at risk. Global Positioning Systems, otherwise known as GPS, create a worldwide problem for users of social media. People’s lives and their privacy are certainly affected by this searching, tracking, and misleading location tracking.