Persuasive Essay On Gay Adoption

Adoption is a process whereby a person assumes the parenting of another, usually a child, from that person's biological or legal parent, and in so doing, permanently transfers all rights and responsibilities, from the biological parent or parents. Unlike guardianship adoption effect a permanent change in status and as such requires societal recognition. Adoption is a good process which helps children in different ways. I prefer to handle adoption worldwide and in all societies regardless from religious point of views.

Unfortunately, there is a number of legal hurdles gay and lesbian couples face when trying to adopt therefore, the system has to be circumvented. Also same sex couples encounter individuals who subconsciously and consciously discriminate through a variety of behaviors including evident harassment or social exclusion (Brown, Smalling, Groza, & Ryan, 2009). It would seem as if the drive to prevent same sex couples from the benefit of joint adoption starts with the discrimination of these couples rather than the welfare of the child (Johnson, n.d). In fact, these discriminations include accusations of psychological disorders and a higher occurrence of domestic violence.

The number of children being adopted by same-sex parents has almost tripled in the past decade. However, to this day, some states still ban gay adoption completely while other states use

Adoption is about finding families for children, it is not about finding children for families (Joyce, 2015). Homosexual people are same as regular people, they wish to have regular families just like anyone. However, why homosexual couples are not allowed to adopted children since they are same as anyone else? In 1851, the first adoption law passed at Massachusetts, North American (Herman, 2012). The adoption of the Massachusetts Children Act 1851 is an important point to give authorizations to judges in validating parents who want to adopt (Herman, 2012). According to the (SOS Children's Village, 2015), there are about 120,000 children being abandon in America per year. Depending on (Regnerus, 2012) past research paper, stated that homosexual

Society has changed to fit the “norms” of its time throughout America. Some groups are still fighting every day to try and fit the norm. Legalizing same-sex adoption is moral because it would help complete a family for a child who doesn 't have one and for a couple that wants one of their own. Morality is defined as what is good and bad in who we are as humans. The right for co-adoption has prolonged throughout the years and there have been milestones which changed the course of history for the LGBT community. In 1973 was the first known opinion in a Colorado court involving a transgender parent to have a child’s custody. A homosexual couple in California became the first throughout the country to jointly adopt a child in the year 1979.

The simple definition of adoption from a book by the British Association for Adoption & Fostering, “Adoption means belonging to and growing up with a new family when you cannot live with the family you were born into.”.( Shah 6) Adoption is being brought into another family when an individual’s birth parents does not want or cannot raise a child due to any reason. It was not their choice to be given up for adoption. Those kids are looking for good and new families to raise them and “An estimated two million LGBT people are interested in adopting.”. (Adoption Statistics 1) The estimate of two million people who are part of the community who want to adopt is a very large number. Many kids are looking for homes and those people who are interested in adoption should provide homes for those children without question. According to an organization called Lifelong Adoptions who are registered with the Registry of California Adoption Facilitators that linked to an equality maps, “Same-sex couples in all states can petition for joint adoption statewide.” (LGBT 1) which means it is legal to petition yet what goes on in the adoption hearing tends to prevent those couples from becoming parents. Hearings tend to bend or exaggerate the opposite side where the birth parents, the more

Adoption is a beautiful system that allows for families to raise a child that could have otherwise been in bad situations. These children are taken in by a family and are given a fresh start. Children can be adopted from birth until they are eighteen years old, but thousands of these children in need are not given the opportunity of adoption because of the extravagant cost. An adoption ranges anywhere from $6,000 to $50,000 and because of this Adopt Together says, “Cost is the number one reason families don’t adopt.” There is a long list of fees that rack up the price that include legal fees, home studies, agency cost, and many more. The extravagant cost of adoption can and should be lowered in order that more families can provide a loving home to children in need.

There are basically two types of adoption agencies: Public agencies that are usually supported by public funding and are run by the state and Private agencies that are licensed by the state, but run privately (Reference 99). Regardless of the type of agency, the state has some say in their operations, and if the state has a ban of gay adoptions, then the agencies will have to abide. In 1977, Florida passed a civil rights ordinance making sexual orientation discrimination illegal in Dade County. In response to the ordinance’s creation, a campaign themed “Save Our Children was created and led by the singer of the hit “Paper Roses” and former Miss Oklahoma beauty pageant winner, Anita Bryant. The campaign, whose members were mainly

Homosexual people have faced many trials and tribulations in pursuit of living a normal and happy life. There are many controversial events and topics that are barriers blocking complete happiness. Although those barriers are in place, the people in the LGBT subculture seem to making the best of every situation. Fighting for their rights and changing laws to protect them are paving the way for a brighter future. In hopes of being normal, many same-sex couples want to have a family and for some the only option is adoption. Well, same-sex adoption is not legal in most places which makes this dream for some impossible. This caused controversy between same-sex couples and the general public who believes that same-sex adoption should remain

Adoption has been around for a long time, however only recently has the topic of gay adoption risen. There are many fostered children on the planet, yet not enough families or guardians to take them in. There aren't that many families who can and will adopt children, regardless of whether this is on account of they can't assist them, they have offspring of their own, or they simply don't want kids. The final product is as yet an excess of stranded children needing an adoring family. There is an answer for this issue. LGBT adoption. There is a rising measure of openly gay couples all around and many of those couples would love to have children, however, it's as yet still illegal for gay couples to adopt children in a few regions of the U.S.,

“State policies banning gay men and lesbians from fostering or adopting children hurt everyone involved” (Hunt and Krehely). Banning same sex couples from adopting is taking away that child’s chance at being able to be in a loving, stable environment and this could dramatically affect the outcome of their lives. There are many positive advantages that the child can get if they were adopted by a lesbian or gay couple.

Gay parents are facing discrimination because of their sexual orientation. Twenty-two states currently allow single gays to adopt and 21 states currently allow gay and lesbian couples to adopt in the U.S. (Mallon, 2007, p. 6). The ability of gay couples to rear a child should not be denied only because they are gay. Homosexuals may be looked down upon by society, but they still are humans and have morals. These morals they possess, may influence a child more than those morals taught to a child with heterosexual parents. All over the world, children suffer in families consisting of alcoholics, drug abusers, and sexual abusers (Powell, 2007, p.1). It is not possible that these environments are safer than what would be provided by homosexual

“About 19 percent of same-sex couples raising children reported having an adopted child in the house in 2009, up from just 8 percent in 2000.” As society changes there opinions on same-sex marriage they more gays and lesbians are adopting. There was recent rise in same-sex adoption but there is still people in U.S. that are against same-sex adoption. Recently a judge in Kentucky objected gay and lesbian adoption. This caused a huge uproar and had people thinking whether or not gay and lesbian adoption is okay for the children. One article feels that state legislators are putting more hurdles in the way of adoption and preventing children from getting into loving and caring homes (“Adoptions are declining,”2017). Gays and lesbians being able to adopt will provide loving homes, get kids out of foster care, and they choose to be parents.

First of all, homosexuals should be allowed to adopt. The goal of our adoption and foster care systems is to provide all children with permanent, stable homes with loving and supportive parents, but discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity and marital status hinders that. State governments bear discrimination, economic costs, same-sex couples are denied the ability to build a family, and, most importantly, children in need of loving and permanent homes are left in unstable caregiving situations. Over the years' child foster care has increased by a big number. With all these restrictions on homosexuals trying to adopt children doesn't help the number go down at all. People are trying to start a family and they can't because people don't believe it's right

Although the law does not prevent a gay man, or lesbian to adopt, it does prevent a couple of gays or lesbians from adopting. When gay or lesbian couples want to adopt they are forced to choose only one of them to become the legal parent of the adopted child(Rogers). There are no need to force only one parent to become the legal one. For example, John Roughan supports that only one gay or lesbian person should be allowed to adopt(New Zealand Herald). He believes that a gay couple or lesbian should not. Roughan refers it to a “fine thing”, but isn’t fine when men are the ones adopting. Roughan does not have a strong argument against kids being adopted by gay and lesbian couples. The only thing that he has is that younger kids will get