Persuasive Essay On Gmo Good Or Bad

As said before, GMOs are genetically modified organisms, and can be dangerous, so experts say. They say that the GMO process causes diseases such as cancer or diabetes, and some also say that GM foods can cause allergic reactions. They are saying this because, as they have discovered, some companies have mixed protein from nuts and inserted into beans, which can be harmful

GMOs are awful for your well being, are very harmful to the environment and the animals that live in the wild, and they are harmful to the future of society. While some may say that GMOs are helping the earth by fixing world hunger this is not true, GMOs are doing more harm than good in our society. Imagine what will happen if we continue to eat these foods without knowing it, they will continue to harm our body and the earth in the future. The real question is, will there be a

Advancements in technology have changed the way of living. The benefits of swapping DNA make the organism more acceptable to the ecosystem; therefore, increasing the survival rate of the organism like cash crops. With our Economy, reliant on these crops there must be a way to produce the most yield without loss. By using GMOs, we can produce a better outcome without spraying pesticides, which is harmful, on the ecosystem. But the Media has portrayed GMOs to cause cancer in the consumer which is causing a concern if GMOs are safe for us to eat.

No scientific consensus has proven on GMO safety. Eating GMO corn and consuming trace levels of Monsanto's Roundup chemical fertilizer caused rats to develop horrifying tumors, widespread organ damage, and premature death. That's the conclusion of a shocking new study that looked at the long-term effects of consuming Monsanto's genetically modified corn. Those rats became so fat that I could not tell where the paws were. I hate rats but when I looked at that poor animal-it just hurt. “ Many of the genetically modified foods will be safe I’m sure. Will most of them be safe? Nobody knows.” says Jeremy Rifkin. Even critics of GMO food is untested the long term effects unknown. Animas have been dying of organ change after eating GMO foods. We’ve all seen science fiction movies that feature monsters created when lab experiments go wrong. What happens if our GM foods turn into “Frankenfoods”? Scientists worry that the process of creating genetically-modified plants could lead to new allergens, carcinogens, nutritional deficiencies, and toxins that we’re unprepared to confront. It’s taken us decades to clean up after toxins like lead and asbestos, and those were known elements. How are we prepared to deal with the side effects of

Some believe that GMOs are harmful to the consumer because they do not like the idea of having chemicals injected into their fruits and vegetables, yet there has been hundreds of test done to show that GMOs are completely safe and are not harmful to humans in anyway. Tests have been conducted and independently funded by The World Health Organization, The FDA and many other huge food science companies. In the past 30 years that GMOs have been in us there has not been one case tying a cancer or any type of illness to GMOs, the unease about GMOs is merely based on theories with no facts to back those theories up.

Meanwhile, a growing body of evidence connects GMOs with health problems, environmental damage and violation of farmers’ and consumers’ rights.

GMOs are not widely popular as they are not natural, their name itself implies it, so the rise of organic trends has risen to pacify the people afraid of consuming GMOs. In my honest opinion, I do not have any issue consuming foods with GMOs as there isn’t any clear evidence directly linking GMOs to diseases in humans. (Arnarson, 2015) In fact, believe they have been highly helpful in many aspects, they are highly resistant to bugs, this also reduces the need to use pesticide in crops, and other natural situations that would otherwise destroy a crop, this prevents the loss of food and provides a constant yield of products. More constant crops make for cheaper food, since there is less loss of food, the needed cost to cover expenses can be distributed among a greater

I want to preface by saying, I did not cherry pick any studies. According Science-Base Medicine (SBM), most if not all anti-GMO studies are done by a few of the same scientists. Their studies are usually flawed and later retracted. This included a peer-review study that claimed that an herbicide made by Monsanto caused cancer in rats. The biggest flaw in this study was that the strain of rat they used had an 80% chance of developing cancer through its lifetime, naturally.

USA Today said, “The Innate Potato is now expected to hit the market… approval by the Food and Drug Administration(FDA).” This shows definate proof that GMO’s are at the very least non-harmful because if the agency that protects us from harmful food approves it, then it must be safe. Furthermore, they said, “88 percent of scientists belonging to the respected American Association for the Advancement of Science consider GMO foods to be generally safe.” Almost all of the scientist say the food is safe, then it must be safe. GMO’s are harmless because they are also tested before they are allowed to be sold. “There’s not been a single food or feed saftey issue associated with the technology” says the people at USA Today. After all this evidence

Genetically modified farming has become more of an issue in the agriculture and nutrition worlds over the past ten years. The big question is, do the benefits of GMO farming outweigh the losses. GMO corporations like Monsanto make business much harder for independent farmers, due to the cost difference and efficiency of GMO farming, as well as other reasons. GMO farming can also save funds and provide produce to a larger range of people. Genetically modified agriculture has an especially strong effect on Hawaii state farmers.While there are benefits to GMO farming, there are also many downsides.

GMO’s are extremely unhealthy for humans to intake. Studies have shown that numerous health problems increased after GMOS were introduced in 1996. Smith states, “The percentage of Americans with

I am strongly against the belief that GMO’s should be allowed for consumption. Although a large amount of food that we consume here in the United States contains GMO’s (Center For Food Safety), no official studies have been conducted by the FDA. Many independent studies have shown that GMO’s could be correlated to the rise in allergies (responsibletechnology.org). Studies have shown that when the safety of GMO’s is tested on rats, the results most commonly show that a majority of the rats receive tumors, or die a premature death (CBS).

There have been numerous reports revealing the negative and potentially disastrous effects of GMOs on the farming industry, individual health, and the environment. In 2009, the National Academy of Science released a report which detailed the negative effects associated with GM products; of these negative effects: “…new allergens, toxins, disruptive chemicals, soil polluting ingredients, mutated species, and unknown protein combinations into our bodies and into the whole environment” were listed (Khan, Muafia, Nasreen, & Salariya, 2012). Khan, Muafia, Nasreen, and Salariya provide a detailed report which goes into further detail regarding these hazards providing evidence which support the risk associated with GM products. Essentially, there are two categories of risks – health and environmental, which are discussed below. However, there is also a significant impact on farming that will also be discussed further below.

The fact of the matter is, we just don’t know the long-term health effects caused by consuming genetically modified organisms. GMOs were only recently invented in 1994 (James, Krattiger, 1996) and testing on their health effects began as recently as 1996 (Smith, 2015). Over the last 20, years numerous tests have been performed to investigate whether or not it is safe to eat genetically modified foods; but 20 years is simply not enough time to make any decisive conclusions about their long-term effects. Animal toxicity studies have shown that mice forced to consume GMOs suffered from abnormal mutations in their hepatic, pancreatic, renal, and reproductive

Much of the public concern surrounding the safety of GMOs stems from the process of actually creating them. This is admittedly not a natural process, which is a surefire way to raise critic’s eyebrows in doubting their safety. However, there is no evidence that supports these myths. The Committee on Genetically Engineered Crops, The National Academy of Science, and the Board on Agriculture and Natural Recourses all agree after extensive testing and observation that there is no additional harm in the consumption of GMO food. The research conducted in animal studies, as well as chemical analysis of the crops, show no indication that GMOs are negatively affecting human health. The next allegation hurled at GMOs is that they may have