Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

This view is true for the 26 developed nations analyzed as well as state-to-state level. Opponents of this view argue that this does not imply that someone cannot get shot in a state like Massachusetts. Despite the strict gun laws in this state, injuries and crimes related to firearms has been on the rise (Swanson 1). Opponents feel that gun control does not do much to regulate firearm related deaths and injuries. They argue that anyone can get shot anywhere; hence, this claim does not hold true. However, statistically speaking, this supporters’ trend holds true. When access to guns is controlled, the rate of homicides is likely to go down.

This article is one of the many articles that provides a realistic approach to the things that can be done about gun control. It shows that it is not as easy as it seems to just get all the guns off of the streets and put a new gun law in place. In fact, it will probably make things worse. It gives readers the bigger picture and gives them something to think about.

Mass shooting situations are never capable of clear premature warnings shots. Friends and family are mostly never aware of what is happening in the shooters life. Mostly outcasts and people that don’t have a connection to people that check up on them. Violence cannot be acted on by the weapon itself, it requires a gunman. Gun restriction of certain sales and consistent background checks violate the second amendment that states “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” ("Gun Control Laws: Should the United States adopt stronger gun control laws?" Issues & Controversies, InfoBase Learning, 11 Oct. 2017). On the other hand, many can argue that the sale of automatic weapon to citizen can be much more dangerous that the sale of semi-automatic weapons such as handguns. After the last decades events, many politicians and people of the public are outraged and want some sort of control on who can access the weapons.

Gun Control is one of the most debatable topic in the United States for the past several decades. America has witnessed assignation to mass shootings. Every time violence and guns are a factor of traumatic events the ongoing topic of gun control reemerges. The question that is asked is if our nation should enforce stricter gun laws. Would these new gun laws contribute to the decrease of gun crime in our nation? American citizens stand divided on this issue; both sides taking a strong position as what they strongly believe what should be done about guns.

In the United States, we have issues that affect many Americans in their day to day lives. They live always wondering when the next breaking news alert will show up on their television, smart phone, or computer; listening to the constant blast of sirens running through the downtown city streets, from police cars, firetrucks, and ambulances. Anything from burglaries, high speed car chases, or shootings keep these emergency personnel on the clock 24/7. The government has many laws established to prevent these outbreaks yet they still constantly happen. Although many of our laws do keep must of our daily lives in a safer routine such as traffic laws and laws meant to keep humans civil such as laws about murder and theft, you would think

The ongoing battle between legislator and citizens over gun control seems that it will go on forever. There have been many research studies since the beginning, throughout the evolution and expansion of gun control and where it stands today to provide the best answers and suggestions of improvement. The war between anti-gun and gun activists rages on in order to understand the primary purpose for gun control, and what the current policies are. Arguments such as self-protection, and if evidence suggests that gun control reduces violent crime, and finally the laws that have eroded due to mass shootings and the mentally ill.

There have been many mass shootings in our country lately. There was Dallas, Las Vegas, and other shootings at churches. One shooting at a church occurred in Tennessee right up the road from Florence. Shootings in churches have really scared people in the church. It is crazy to believe that in our country some people are scared to go to church because of shooters that could possibly come in and harm them. These shooters have no mercy on people. No matter how old or how young they are it does not matter to them. It takes a crazy person to shoot up a building full of all ages. One of the shootings a five year old was killed. That isn’t even close to right. The government shouldn’t control what kind of guns are sold. The government should control who’s buying the guns. Guns can be a very good thing. Many people like to hunt and that requires using a gun to enjoy their hobby. Others like maybe people who have been in the military just like to shoot guns for fun. Then you have the people who just like to collect guns that look good. Those are some good reasons to have guns. People also buy guns with the intention to harm others. That is where making it harder to buy guns would come in handy. It isn’t the gun that kills people, it is the person using the gun that kills people

Policies which prohibit the output and use of guns, otherwise known as gun control, are necessary in the security and safety of families and individuals of a community. Generally, the violence and consequences of firearms have decreased dramatically through time, as

Though some regulation for firearms are absolutely necessary, it would be imbecilic to say that firearms should be more regulated as if they were a privilege instead of a natural right. Gun control is a term that calls for the control and regulation of firearms owned by individual people. The often justifications for gun control by legislators who support it, is that guns are inherently bad in nature and that society should limit them as much as possible. However the issue is not the weapon being used, it is the individual who is using the weapon to begin with. Therefore it is for this reason in particular that gun control should not be as proposed by most left wing legislation.

Everyone should have the right to have a gun in their homes for protection! Because obviously we have them to use it in order to attack someone. Now Democratic Party wants every gun in the state property registered and they want everyone to take a “Mental Health” test before they get a gun. Witch I totally agree with, because you never know what type of a person they’re. We should also watch their backgrounds.

There should be more laws enforced when it comes to gun control. There are good reasons to limit gun control, and to have them. The right to bear arms is guaranteed in our Constitution, therefore cannot be completely removed from people. Although,there​ ​should​ ​be​ ​stricter policies​ ​when​ ​anyone​ ​is​ ​purchasing​ ​a​ ​gun.​ ​Such​ ​as​ ​background​ ​checks,waiting​ ​periods​ ​to receive​ ​firearms,​ ​strong​ ​handgun​ ​regulations​ ​and​ ​a​ ​required​ ​safe​ ​firearm​ ​storage​ ​under​ ​the federal​ ​law. The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns. Guns are intended for self-defense for threats from any sort of criminal. In America 22% of people are owners of one or more guns.The gun control law states that the Second Amendment is intended for militias. That there has always been gun restrictions, including gun owners and support new gun restrictions. Some people will oppose to the idea for more laws to enforce gun control. One idea is that making it more difficult to legally purchase a weapon will make a person unarmed and vulnerable. Another con idea is that no matter what laws are created evil people will do evil things. The right to carry laws have been on the rise since the 1990s, violent crimes have decreased. The number for gun owners has risen by about 100 million. There needs to be more laws enforced when it comes to gun control. Some may say that the public awareness for gun control grew after John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

To initiate,bringing gun control will make society safer.In order to undertand the subject of this controversial item,onewould first need to understand the reason why there is a need for guns. When asking a single person why there is a need for guns,it attacks a physiological problem.’They [gun owners] say guns give people the power or self defense--and dissuade criminals from victimizing people who might be armed.’(Smith,3)The people have a tendency to believe that owning a firearm will ensure protection and their safety.Therefore,owning a gun is equal to feeling safe to some.This is an often misconception because ”being safe is not equal to being safe.”(Polsby,2) A

The right to own and use guns is what the United States was built on and guns made America what it is today. America got their independence with the help of guns. Most people use their guns for hunting and for the protection of themselves and others. Americans should be able to have guns and that shouldn’t be infringed, but there should be laws to make things safer.

The modern world is and extremely diverse place. Together with the process of globalization, the society has met the increasing amount of problems in social, economic, political and cultural aspects, which appeared to be the other side of all the benefits of the mentioned process. First of all, the globalization has led to the standardization assimilation of cultures as well as trends in lawmaking and juridical processes. First of all, it could be notable in the activity of international organizations, which recommend the countries to proceed with some legal initiatives, which would be beneficial for the world. However, there are still some issues, which can not be solved either on the international or the national level. One of the most notable problems, which was described above is the question of gun usage for individuals. The thoughts about this option are diverse in the society. Some people claim that free access to guns is the key to democracy and total freedom and would decrease the number of committed crimes drastically. At the same time, their opponents state that if people have access to guns, the world will become a total disaster with blood and violence all around the street. There are also less radical thoughts about the issue. To understand all the aspects of the problem and define whether the freedom of gun usage is appropriate it is necessary to conduct research on this topic.

Gun violence is unpredictable and can happen to anyone, no matter how old or young. Setting policies that regulate the manufacturing, variety, or possession of firearms to the general public can influence a decrease of chaotic gun violence. Some might think that taking away these privileges or firearms will just harm the public by leaving us defenseless but in fact will make us safer. Limiting the production and variety of firearms can benefit ending mass shootings and other related violence. Making laws or policies that are more careful about the possession of firearms will benefit civilian safety. Setting stricter procedures to obtain a firearm will help not get them in the wrong hands. Gun control is a controversial topic, but it needs to be brought up to end the unnecessary violence once and for all.