Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

With gun related crimes steadily increasing, the spotlight has been on a solution to cease firearm problems. Firearms have been around for hundreds of years, and they are included in self-defense, sport, show, and unfortunately crime. The danger of the situation immediately escalades when there is a firearm involved. A plan to fix these issues has been talked about and looked at throughout the recent years, but there are many different aspects you have to look at when trying to find a solution for this problem. However, not all gun related situations are at fault, for most people follow the law, using and collecting the guns for sporting, collecting, and self-defense purposes. The second amendment in the constitution gives citizens of the United states the right to bear arms. Areas of concern that can be focused on to prevent future danger in firearm situations are gun control laws, process undergone

October 1, 2017 marked the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history. With almost 500 injured and 58 killed, not only did Las Vegas feel the tragedy of a personal loss, but the incident had rippling effects that shook all of America (Flaherty). With the fresh wounds of the recent Las Vegas shooting, politician's initial reaction is to implement more strict gun restrictions and "lay down the law" to prevent a similar event from happening again. Due to the drastic laws being carried out, the topic of gun control is a current issue in society. Is the solution to implement more firm restrictions on gun ownership or can the government allow the people to be their own advocates? While the opposing views of pro-gun restrictions argue that is up to the discretion of the government, they are often narrow-minded resolutions with no hope to finding a real solution. This particular shooter obtained his guns legally and passed all background checks, going unnoticed until his plan unfolded. Establishing more strict firearm restrictions would not have stopped the Las Vegas shooting from occurring. The number of gun restrictions can not increase, the government needs to either fix the existing laws or do away with gun restrictions entirely. Gun restrictions are not the solution because guns are not doing the killing--people are, the laws only attack the law-abiding citizens, and the gun restrictions add another infringed upon right that the government controls. While voting against additional gun rules will not completely eliminate the controversy behind this topic, voting against these laws will be a milestone to regaining the rights we have already been promised.

On October 1st 2017, Steven Paddock shot and killed 58 people at a country music festival in Las Vegas, Nevada. Over the course of 12 minutes, Paddock committed the worst mass shooting in modern American history. We must honor the victims and respect their memory, but we have to ask ourselves what we will do to prevent this in the future. The first and completely valid response to that question is enacting stricter gun control, but there is much more than that. We can increase funding for mental health treatment, we can take stricter security measures at hotels and concerts, however there is something major that needs to be changed that hardly ever gets talked about. It’s something that we are used to, that we have seen all throughout our

Coming from a family that owns guns, the topic of gun ownership has become more pertinent than ever. From a young age, my grandfather instructed me on the proper care and usage of firearms. However, due to a death within the family years ago due to gun violence, the repercussions of the Second Amendment have become more palpable. Approximately 73% of the 16,459 homicides could have been avoided in 2016 solely if guns didn't exist, and 11,961 lives potentially saved according to data calculated from the Federal Bureau of Investigation dataset. Whether or not the people of the United States agree with more gun control, the choice of allowing guns to the public puts everyone at a potential risk of encountering a firearm related crime. The glaring need for improved gun control within the U.S. became apparent in the recent

Lately, there has been a controversy about gun control due to an increase is gun crime. With all the crimes throughout the years, many people don't know if we should have more laws for firearms or no more than what we have now. Within the last year, there has been about 53,000 incidents alone, but the year before was about 52,000 so not much of a difference of the two years. With mass shooting between the years 2014-2015 here is the only difference of eighty that had occurred and been reported, but yet with the accidental shootings, they are about equal with 2,000 that were reported (Past summary ledgers). The number of deaths that happened in 2015 was around 13,000 and in 2014, it was 1,000 less than that within the year gap. The new laws not only affect the people who oppose firearms but

Gun control. It has been a very controversial topic for many years, more recently with the Las Vegas shooting. Some think we should put into place more laws to ban the buying and/or selling of firearms. Some think guns aren’t the problem, but rather the person pulling the trigger. Gun control is defined as the set of laws or policies that regulate the manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, or use of firearms by civilians.. I think the 2nd Amendment right to self-protection and defense of liberty should be granted to all those eligible ( legal age, no criminal history, nonviolent background, etc). New laws would not only affect those who oppose firearms, but especially those who rely on it for protection. Those who are pro gun control believe if we put more restrictions into effect then the death rates would decrease and the likelihood of a mass shooting would decrease as well. Stricter gun control laws will not decrease the criminal element in society, but rather would take away from law abiding citizens.

The modern world is and extremely diverse place. Together with the process of globalization, the society has met the increasing amount of problems in social, economic, political and cultural aspects, which appeared to be the other side of all the benefits of the mentioned process. First of all, the globalization has led to the standardization assimilation of cultures as well as trends in lawmaking and juridical processes. First of all, it could be notable in the activity of international organizations, which recommend the countries to proceed with some legal initiatives, which would be beneficial for the world. However, there are still some issues, which can not be solved either on the international or the national level. One of the most notable problems, which was described above is the question of gun usage for individuals. The thoughts about this option are diverse in the society. Some people claim that free access to guns is the key to democracy and total freedom and would decrease the number of committed crimes drastically. At the same time, their opponents state that if people have access to guns, the world will become a total disaster with blood and violence all around the street. There are also less radical thoughts about the issue. To understand all the aspects of the problem and define whether the freedom of gun usage is appropriate it is necessary to conduct research on this topic.

Guns can protect you in various occasion because imagine yourself walking lonely in a street full of thugs and one comes up to you, and points a gun to your head. People should be able defend themselves. In the past few years there has been many mass shootings carried out by mental people, and gun owners are paying the consequences by the government restricting gun laws even more. Guns don’t kill, people kill. Mexico has one of the rigorous gun control laws on the world and yet they’ve massive shootings. They only have one legal gun store and it is under extreme surveillance. In the other hand, The United States has an easy access to guns, and they’ve several shootings. The United States has more than 50,000 legal gun stores. In few words, the Mexican government has some of the strictest laws for the acquisition of weapons. These are not respected and, therefore, in the United States it will be the same because there are many gaps in the laws. These gaps in gun control can be used by society as best suits their interests. We should not lose the right to bear arms because these weapons provide safety, deter crime, and Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bare arms.

Considering that the United States has an extremely high number of firearms per capita and very flimsy gun laws, these statistics cannot be said to exist without reason (Sanders). Even worse is that the problem has only exacerbated in current years, continuing a trend that has insidiously been creeping up on the United States. As indicated in Figure 1, an analysis from the Harvard School of Public Health and Northeastern University showed that the average time between a shooting from 2011-2014 was approximately two hundred days. Similarly, the average between 2011 and 2014 was just a measly sixty-four days (Chalabi). Even more surprising is that amongst all the raucous, the general sentiment towards guns in the U.S. has become largely pro-ownership. Google Trends, which is a product of Google Inc., shows how often a particular search-phrase is input compared to the total search volume across numerous regions across the planet. Its results indicate that over the years, sentiment has shifted from gun control to ownership (Google). Perhaps the reason for this shift is an indicator of patience running out for certain politicians that have sworn to increase safety by taking guns from the hands

In december 15, 1791, the bill was passed and the second amendment was the right to bear arm. This was the second most patriotic law in the bill of rights because as americans we felt like we had the right to protect our own family from any harm. I believe it is right as humans to protect our own because guns don't kill people, people always have the power to do that guns are just a method of killing someone. The gun movement started in 1968 with the first gun control law to prevent anyone with felons from purchasing another weapon for over 49 years the united states has been combating gun control. It is important that we find the right law for gun control because some states gun laws are out of control to a point where anyone can purchase a assault rifle and many mass murders or school shooting have been committed with military weapons. According to gun archive there was 282 mass murders caused by gun violence, in these articles there going to explain how we can reduce gun violence and what would happen if we eliminated guns. The first article I chose was called police in schools makes student safer. Many people have suggested ways to prevent more gun violence like school shooting by adding police officers in schools or having teachers be armed inside the school. The first article stake from someone who does have. I believe that it would be a great idea for having actual officers inside the school instead of giving teacher the right to carry weapons because kids would

On December 12, 2012, around 9:45, six adults and twenty children suffered a tragic death when twenty-year-old Adam Lanza killed them. This shooting sparked the debate on the issue of gun control. In current years gun violence has multiplied considerably in various parts of the world. There are greater cases of kids and teens engaging in violence or getting caught in the crossfire. There have been debates over whether gun legal guidelines are strict and what else can be accomplished to lessen such acts from taking place. With greater lives being affected on an ordinary basis, extra concerns stand up as to how human beings can stay secure when weapons are being used in growing numbers. It's far shameful to say that nearly each day you listen to some sort of gun violence affecting humans either in your native land or in any other part of the world.

December 14th, 2012 should have been an ordinary Wednesday morning at Sandy Hook Elementary School. 29 shots had been fired, all except for one ringing within the span of five minutes. 20 children had died and 20 families were never the same. Disbelief spread on an international level at the thought of 28 lives taken in cold blood, due to citizens of the United States having an irresponsible accessibility to firearms.Years have passed, and the number of mass shootings depicted in modern media have increased exponentially. The United States is also considered one of the most violent countries in the Global North. As a Canadian, its easy to blame it on the progressively nationalist political climate, but inevitably we cannot ignore that the issue is an ease of access to firearms and ammunition. The central political foundations of the United States are a corrupt cycle that repeats consistently - especially when the campaigns are funded by organizations who condone the mass production and distribution of guns.  The United States is one of very few countries that protect their citizen’s rights to bear arms under the constitution. However, the history behind the birth of the Second Amendment is barbarous and demands more security. Recent events have resulted in the deaths of countless American citizens and dictate the push for stricter gun control. Although similar actions have had loopholes in the past and total abolishment of gun rights infringe upon the Constitution, I

In society today, there has been great controversy on gun control due to the increase in gun crime. However are these new laws really helping to protect the innocent victims that have been hurt in the past? Or is it only keeping the guns out of the hands of the people who rely on them for protection? Too many people have been harmed by the misuse of firearms, the government should not be revoking gun laws due to the Second Amendment, or even for the fact that guns have provide protection for others in one or two situations, they should be thinking of more way to prevent guns from ending up in criminal hands.

Have you ever been walking late at night and worried because you know that your city allows guns? Guns have many downsides that create problems in different areas. The reasons for many murders come from guns. Guns are bad in most situations than good. We are in the twenty-first century where most people don’t need a gun. In this country the law has a big impact on what people buy and what they use. Guns need to be abolished from society because they are a danger to citizens, they increase stress for people walking around knowing that there are guns around them, and they decrease safety in areas that allow guns.

Gun control has been a very controversial topic in America in recent years. America is the most armed nation in the world, with American citizens owning more than a quarter of the world’s firearms (Marshall).Currently, gun control is mainly governed by state law. Throughout the nation, there are several supporters of gun control fighting to create more gun-restriction laws in an effort to decrease gun violence. At the same time, there are also many people who opposed to more gun-restricting laws, believing that by applying more laws, it only makes it more difficult for law-abiding citizens to acquire firearms, leaving them defenseless against criminals. Throughout this paper I hope to inform you on why this issue exists, measures took to correct this issue and newly formed ideas that can potentially correct it.