Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

Gun control has been a long debate to determine if it’s better to have stricter access to firearms. America is one of the few countries that has gun rights embedded in their constitution. But what makes the US exceptional is that it has the right to keep and bear arms, other countries do not provide the right to have access to them, but rather, the government is allowed to regulate its use. The right to bear arms has also been the cause of growing violence and crime, at least according to anti-gun lobbyists. Citizens should be aware the dangers and harm that guns present to society. Controlling the sale of firearms can greatly decrease the number of violent crimes.

In 2015, on an average day in America, thirty-six Americans were killed by guns, excluding suicides. How many of those deaths would have been prevented if there were stricter gun laws? How many parents would have lived to see their babies grow up? How many children would have lived to graduate, or get married? Although many Americans believe that gun control takes away their second amendment right it actually increases every citizen’s safety by the use of extensive background checking, checking medical records, and restricting gun distributors.

If gun control becomes as strict as other countries, the only citizens who would be allowed to have guns would be law enforcement officers, and they cannot be everywhere at one time. Big city police chiefs are more likely to support gun control (Perez-Pena). The population in big cities is much higher which means that more people would have access to guns. The police want to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. I believe that a criminal will find any means necessary to commit a crime. “It’s not the device, it’s the people (Solis).” Most mass shootings are preceded by warning signs usually in the form of social media or behavior changes (Hockley). We need to look into ways to keep guns out of the hands of those with mental issues and those who have criminal records. Gun shops have the capability of accessing the background history of a customer. Many mass shootings have been linked to people who have been recognized as being deeply disturbed (Perez-Pena). We are on track to educate more than two million children and adults across 50 states on identifying at-risk behaviors and depression (Hockley). If

According to Nicholas Kristof’s article “our blind spot about guns” gun control is a lot like cars regulation such that if we can regulate cars we can regulate guns. It took a lot of time and effort but thanks to regulations cars are safer than they were many years ago, and the same is very possible with guns. We need to keep our country safe. The first steps to gun control are improving on background checks and also requiring trigger locks on all guns.

Over the past couple of years, being able to access a gun has been too easy for criminals. They have been able to easily pass background checks. This is why there needs to be stronger background checks to protect people from criminals. Also, gun laws do not need to be too strong so that no one can protect themselves. “In 2002 at the Appalachian School of Law [in Grundy, Virginia]. Hearing shots, two students went to their cars, got their guns and restrained the shooter until police arrested him”(Guns Save Lives). This is an example of why having guns could help. If there were laws that prevented these 2 students to own guns, the whole situation could have been worse. There could have been more deaths but instead, since they had guns, they were able to control the situation and protect themselves. Lastly, Americans have always had the right to bear arms. “The right to bear arms has been a long American tradition. From the time the colonists settled on North American soil, Americans have held weapons to protect themselves”(The History of the Right to Bear Arms). If there were always laws then America would not have been America. Changing this would just lead more people to be mad and cause more problems. It will be better off if the laws remain the same. Limiting the amount of gun laws will allow people to own a gun and protect themselves and having stricter background checks will make it harder for a criminal to acquire a

For years there has been a never-ending debate on gun controls due to high crime rates, and those who want to own a gun have to fight for their rights in order to physically own one; now that this has been a very hostile topic discussed for many years here in the United States. Before the enforcement of gun control, American citizens were capable of owning a loaded firearm in their house with no explanation; now due this topic is being discussed, firearms are showing up as red flags across the United States that are truly upsetting thousands of fellow Americans who own one, to multiple firearms. As for oneself, having such a strict gun control leaves individuals going behind the governments back using their firearms by having them shot off illegally or even so not at ranges due to the inflation of costs. It’s not just those who have no intention of criminal actions, but those who have intentions of killing individuals, have to be protective of their firearms as well, keeping them even more of a secret from onlookers estimating the crime rates to increase by enforcing this law.

Gun control has once again become the topic of interest and debate in the United States. A mass shooting in Las Vegas very recently sparked it back up. A man used illegal weapons to injure over 500 defenseless people in a crowd, and around 60 lost their lives in the tragedy. Legal guns in the hands of sane U.S. citizens, however, have positive effects. Providing a sense of security for families, helping to stop crimes, and empowering women are some examples of the effects of gun ownership.

Owners such as myself are being perceived as a bad guy just because we own a gun. although they might not be trying to pass a complete ban, each time gun control legislation passes, we are getting closer to it. Our new elected president voted to fully ban handguns in chicago when he was still a senator. but would banning the ownership and selling of handguns make chicago a safer place?

Gun control has become quite the controversial topic over the past few years. With the number of mass shootings rising each year, there’s no doubt about why it is more controversial than ever. But, I don’t believe having complete gun control will end to mass shootings and deaths in America. Gun control is important, but it needs to be thought about in different perspectives. Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.

There needs to be a change to the laws that we follow today and one of those laws is the gun control law. We need to have stricter gun control laws because it will prevent more people from being able to acquire a firearm. In Today’s generation, everyone seems to have a gun, whether they use it for protection or just to make stupid decisions. We have teenagers robbing people at gunpoint, kids bringing guns to schools because they want to show it off to their friends or

The US accounts for half of the guns in the entire world although the US only accounts for 5% of the world population (Guncontrolfacts.org). Every

There has been much controversy over gun control. The posing question is: will gun control help our country and should it be allowed? Some people believe that more laws and restrictions on the purchase of guns would help our country stay safer. Others claim that gun ownership is a constitutional right and that restricting access to guns violates this right. The debate about gun control should not be taken lightly, for the lives of the American public are at stake. Gun control is not the answer. Our nation needs to closely look at what motivates individuals to use guns for killing, and find methods to solve the underlying problem. This will ultimately keep the people of the United States safe.

I thought more guns on the street would make people commit more crime. There would be more school shooting or movie theater massacres. I believed that having more guns would promote violence, but in reality was wrong. I saw that if there was a person with a concealed weapon, lives could have been saved. Colleges would be a safe place to learn and achieve your goals and not a place where you fear if there will be a shooting. In reality passing concealed weapons law would make it safer. It will bring down crime; making people double think if it’s a good idea to commit a crime. Law abiding citizens would be able to carry a gun openly and use it in case of an emergency. An emergency would consist of lives being in danger, someone being robed, to stop a store robbery, to defend yourself. Everyone would benefit from this not just the person with the gun. It’s true what they say, guns don’t kill people, people kill people, but only if they are in the wrong hands in the first place. That’s why new laws are being passed to regulate guns. Tests are being placed to see if the person is physiologically capable of carrying a gun. Just by looking at someone’s background doesn’t give you the full history of the person. Oregon recently took a step forward to become a more peaceful place. Florida has had regulations of private gun sales. The state of Texas knows what is right. They know that allowing concealed weapons in public is a good decision, which has been proven to work. They would have to go to place to have a background check. I once believed that guns were the problem, but I soon found out that it’s the people that hold them that are bad. That’s why Oregon should pass the open carry law, to make another safe

While others may argue that having more people own guns will raise the chances of crimes, as long as there’s requirements to owning one we should be safe. It’s convenient to have one in your possession so that you are able to defend yourself if the situation ever arises. You never know when someone could just pull up and threaten you, but if you own a gun you could easily defend yourself. Without weapons no one would really be able to defend themselves and despite them also being dangerous they protect us as well. No matter how we may neglect weapons because of destructive they may be we can’t run from the fact that they keep us safe at the same time. Having citizens be safe is a high priority that cannot be escaped, we’d want everyone to feel

Nowadays, gun control is a hot and heavy topic. Some believe the laws should be stricter while others believe in the right to bear arms and nothing infringing that right. The people who believe in stricter laws are putting their main focus on murders, robberies, and other negative things that go along with any weapon. However, while guns are an accessory to murder, robbery, and many other crimes, they also have positive effects on people. For many people, guns have saved their lives, fed their families, and or made a lifelong career for them. By making gun laws stricter, that only affects the law-abiding citizens. Ironically, the criminals committing these violent crimes are still going to have guns. So, while criminals have guns, the law-abiding citizens are left helpless. Overall, gun control should be kept to a minimum because guns can positively develop individuals.