Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

Gun control would only make it easier for criminals to commit crimes. Gun ownership reduces the amount of crime. States with concealed carry regulations have a higher rate of crime. States with stricter concealed carry have higher rates of crime because criminals can commit crime without worry of being stopped by gun owners. If guns are banned, criminals would be the only ones with guns. Citizens that follow the laws would still follow the laws, whereas criminals would still break the law. Gun Ownership reduces crime, not gun control.

Anyone who believes strengthening the gun control laws would reduce gun violence is correct. However, if someone wants to kill someone, not having a gun is unfortunately not going to stop him or her. If a gun is not accessible, a person who wishes to kill someone will use another weapon that is accessible, such as a knife or bludgeon of sorts. Banning guns will lessen gun violence, but will bring up a rise in violence with other weapons.

Thousands of deaths can be prevented with a firearm, there needs to be a more of an extensive background checks than just restricting the weapon itself. In 2011 according to the FBI the total amount of firearm murders (not just rifles but all guns) came to 8,583, And according to Bill Whitte studies show that firearms prevent anywhere from 800,000 to over two million violent crimes every year. That’s 1% of the population. With a regular background check, a previous criminal offense will prevent gun ownership, but it doesn't check for any signs for a potential criminal.

Humans have the right to use guns for protection. “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” (Donald Trump). Over 1,500 criminals a year are stopped by armed citizens. Due to the armed citizens, many people’s lives have saved. Gun control limits the good people with guns and boost the number of bad people with guns. Gun control doesn’t change the fact the bad guys still can get a gun illegally. Without armed citizens with legal guns, the criminals have all the power taking away the natural human right of protection.

First, a lot of people talk about how the US needs stricter laws, however, the US already has strict laws, with licensing, background checks, the problem is that they aren't being perpetrated by law enforcement. According to Mic.com the law enforcement agency are not strongly enforcing gun laws that exist such as the prosecution of people who falsify background check, or people who use straw-man purchases, the act of having someone else buy a gun for someoneelse. Due to this, people can easily buy get hold of a gun, without facing prosecution. It isn't because there aren't strict gun laws it's that the people who should be enforcing them aren't. (Matt MacBradaigh, January 14, 2013)

Over 13,286 people yearly die from gun violence. In 2016 over 700 people were killed due to guns in the streets of chicago. Which is the most restricted place to purchase weapons. So they would get it from other ways. Such as buying out of state, or the black market. People would have to resort to these dangerous tactics if only there were less gun control laws. When there can be a simple solution that is not looked at. A solution that could completely fix the problem by the way it started.

Firearms have been in our culture since the beginning of time. Guns have been used for many things from hunting and sports, and in some cases, personal protection. The Greek philosopher Aristotle wrote in politics, “That ownership of weapons was necessary for true citizenship.”(The History) Now there are laws, people, and groups trying to take “the right to bear arms” away from U.S. citizens. Gun control is not the answer to the whole gun problem. The laws can help prevent criminal activity, with some positive effects that gun control has. But gun control is not going to solve anything.

The topic of gun control seems to be split into two different opinions for the most part. Some people believe there should not be strict government regulations on most guns because it is part of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. This amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." @@@ Most people who support the 2nd amendment believe that the government should not be allowed to impinge on the public’s right to own and use guns. On a completely other note, some people believe the government needs to step in and regulate guns. Some areas that people believe need regulating can include how guns are obtained, how many one person can own, and the type of guns that can be sold to the public. In my own opinion, even though some Americans believe access to guns help protect people and is a right, there should be heavy regulations on large capacity weapons and magazines put in place to help decrease the amount of gun-related violence in America.

Picture this: Hanna is sitting at home watching her most loved film and she hears somebody thumping on the entryway. She disregards it since she is not expecting anybody at 11:00 P.M.The thumping gets to be distinctly louder then she hears the entryway is being kicked. Before she knew it the entryway was kicked in. Presently if she somehow managed to call the police it will go up against normal 10 minutes for them to react. Weapon control made it too hard for her to get a gun. What's more, The criminal was physically more grounded than her and he murdered her since it wasn't  his expectation to victimize somebody. His aim was to hurt or slaughter. Fortunately, this isn't the means

The Second Amendment asserts that you have the right to bear arms, but to what extent? Numerous loopholes now exist that allow for individuals with mental health issues or criminal records to purchase guns. For example, a gun purchased over the internet or from a private vendor at a gun show is exempt from background checks because neither instance does not necessarily require licensed gun sellers. Increasing amounts of gun violence affect citizens of the United States daily and this number will continue to expand until precautions are imposed. Society is culturally embracing violence and becoming willfully blind to the dangers surrounding this civilization. Yes, we have the right to protect our country, and ourselves but from what? It

You hear about it on the news. Mass shootings, people killed, several injured. This is the world we live in today. Our daily lives have been infected by the hate of others. Recent events have caused an uproar on a debate that has been going on for years. Gun control. This was an idea sparked in 1999 and has not had a resting point. Controlling society and controlling guns is not going to fix an issue that has been around for almost 20 years. We must control the access to guns. Ultimately, it is not the guns that are killing people, it’s the people that are killing people.

Firstly, with the regulation of guns, everyday liberties could be in jeopardy. When Adolf Hitler took over Germany, he “banned gun ownership for the Jews” (Root, 2). The Jews were a targets for German hatred and as a result he purposely left them defenseless in a world of violence. With no weapons, they could not fight back against the troops, which then further enabled Hitler to dominate them without worries of a retaliation. If Americans were granted strict gun control laws, who is to say those with guns would not further oppress those they deem as unworthy or useless? Who is going to stop them from crushing the innocent like simple roaches who wonder in the filth of our homes? Everyone puts up front, a front that may fake the feeling of

“Law-abiding citizens use guns to defend themselves against criminals as many as 2.5 million times every year -- or about 6,850 times a day. [1] This means that each year, firearms are used more than 80 times more often to protect the lives of honest citizens than to take lives. [2]” (Fact Sheet) Some people in the U.S. believe guns are dangerous and no one should have a gun so the solution should be to have a gun ban law be past. But in reality that would not work because without guns in the hands of good people chaos would happen in the U.S. Having gun control laws made from the government, such as taking guns from current owners will not work in reducing crime relating in gun violence because criminals will always have a way to get guns whether it is black markets, across borders or illegal street sale.

Banning guns will leave many citizens defenseless. The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. For example, Stephen Willeford One of the two heroes from the Southernland Springs shooting that took place in Southernland Springs, Texas. Willeford is a neighbor to the Southernland Springs Church heard the gunshots ringing

Being a daughter of a game warden and also growing up in the rural southern parts of Tennessee, I have always been exposed to firearms my entire life. There is a famous quote that is relevant to gun control, “there are no bad guns, only bad men” (Squires, 2002). Placing restrictions on firearms has been one of the biggest political affairs in not only America but other countries as well. Firearms in America make up $24 billion of our economy, therefore, we can say that guns play a major role in the U.S. Many people believe implementing gun laws and regulations seems to be more of a disadvantage than an advantage to our country, because gun control has failed in places like Ireland and the United Kingdom.