Persuasive Essay On Gun Control Laws

Current Gun Control regulations do not deter violence and crime. It has been shown that places that have relaxed their gun control laws have a higher crime and death rate. Data proves that homicide rates “[...] among the metro areas whose principal city is in a state that requires some form of permit to purchase a gun, is 4.32 per 100,000 residents, compared with 5.74 among cities in no-permit states”(Bailey). This is evidence that there is a correlation between gun control and death rates. It is also proven with statistical evidence that places with the least amount of gun control have the most violence. Statistics show that “‘none of the states with the most gun violence require permits to purchase rifles, shotguns, or handguns. Gun owners are also not required to register

Guns laws in America are one of the most controversial topics today that are dividing many U.S. citizens. Many people are ignorant to what new gun laws will enforce and what statistical data shows about gun violence. Future Gun laws will be used to control guns in America, making it restricted to own and buy weapons. Although some people say that stricter gun laws will protect people more than concealed carry laws, the reality is that concealed carry laws allow individuals to better defend themselves and their families.

The amount of crimes happening today will only increase with stricter gun control laws because there is a higher temptation to steal guns. An American citizen claims, “Ever since I first learned how to shoot, the issue with gun violence around the nation became clear: Guns are not the problem; people are” (Sherfenski). Police need to lock up these people committing the disastrous crimes that affect so many innocent lives. These blameless people are not prepared when they are being attacked, and that is because most shootings tend to happen in areas where guns are controlled. The former United States Secretary of Education, William Bennett, explains the reason that criminals decide to go to places that have controlled gun laws is because: “These murderers, while deranged and deeply disturbed, are not dumb. They show up to schools, universities, malls and public places where their victims cannot shoot back” (Bennett). Even if guns are controlled in public places including malls and schools, where there are uncontrolled shootings, why would it make a difference if they were controlled everywhere? It would not make a difference whatsoever because these crimes are done out of pure, revolting pleasure. Committing a crime is one thing, but taking away a right that was given to Americans in the 1790s is a whole different story.

“A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” The right of all Americans to bear arms is a right the Founding Fathers held to equal importance as the Constitution itself. Gun control laws directly violate this right and therefore should not even be under consideration. Even if that issue is overlooked, gun control advocates state that in order to reduce firearm related violence, gun control laws must be implemented to remove the violence caused by firearms. Although this may seem reasonable, the consequences of such laws are ironically counterproductive; they exacerbate the problem instead of fixing it. Besides the fact that the American

A Nov. 26, 2013 study found that, between 1980 and 2009, Lott states, "assault weapons bans did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level" and "states with restrictions on the carrying of concealed weapons had higher gun-related murders." While gun ownership doubled in the twentieth century, the murder rate decreased. Another things is that states with the largest amount of people owning a gun have seen decreases in violent crimes. This is because people have the guns to protect themself and a criminal normally doesn't want to get into a gun fight with someone. Once the law was passed that people could own a gun, multiple-victim shooting have declined about 84% in those states.(Pro&Con Arguments) Gun control laws are also taking away people's safety. Say a criminal walks into a person's house with a gun and the other person doesn't because it is against the law, is it fair ,to be in that situation without something to protect

Gun laws. One of the most controversial things in America, due to the second amendment of the United States Constitution which gives the right to bear firearms. Recent massacres and hate crimes have been executed with some sort of firearm, however, the gunman has been taken down with a firearm. The fight between Pro-Gun and Anti-Gun groups has yet to cease, and who knows if it ever will. I know I can’t make a National impact, so I thought smaller, what about California State laws? I spent 3 hours reading through every single State of California Gun Laws, and found one that had an easy solution that could make a huge impact, whether people will realize it or not. Penal Code 29805 states that if a person has lost their privilege of owning a

May 4, 2017, Georgia Senate signed the “campus carry” gun bill. On July 1, 2017, Georgia’s “campus carry” gun law went into effect. The bill legalized conceal carry in some areas of public college and university campuses. Valdosta State University (VSU) will now allow guns onto campus. There are a lot of stipulations in the bill; That may cause the campus to have many gun-free zones. Guns will still be banned from student housing, fraternity and sorority houses or any room or class with high school students present. The conceal carry law is only for people with a weapon carry licenses. To apply for these licenses, you must be 21 years or older. Most students don’t even meet the age requirement to conceal carry. There are a lot of mixed emotions

Gun control doesn't deter crime gun ownership does . My problem with gun control laws is that they don’t deter violent crime but it does limit the second amendment . This is such a big discussion because millions of gun owners and suppliers are involved . This topic also was strong ties to the constitution because in the bill of rights states that all U.S citizens have the right to bear arms . Everyone has the ability to exercise the right to bear arms to defend themselves or others for the common good of society .

In the United States over the past few years, there have been some serious gun violence problems.. From 1999-2015, there have been 533,879 casualties caused by a firearm; that is an average of 33,367 casualties per year, (“Us Guns” 1). The Second Amendment reads “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed”, (“Second Amendment ” 1). However, with America having an average of about 33,367 casualties a year caused by firearms, it is time changes are made to the Second Amendment to make guns partially illegal in order to reduce violence. The government needs to restrict firearms from criminals and those with mental disabilities and require background checks and screenings in order to prevent the next mass shooting or homicide.

Guns have many uses in the United States, for example, they are using guns to protect civilians in the law enforcement department, they can also be used to protect a property or even for self-defense in a life-death situation. They are so needed that even the constitution states it on the 2nd amendment. However, due to many mass massacres in the last decades, especially taking account the mass shooting in California and Texas in the last 2 months, many opinions have lead the gun regulation into a controversy. However, something that must be considered into account in this debate is the political system the United States enforce, which is Federalism, and many would think, what has to be this with the gun regulation? The answer is that Federalism allows every state to enforce different laws in their jurisdiction as long it does not cause any conflict with the constitution. One example, could be the gun regulation itself because all states follow the permission to use guns, but they change the way they can obtain one. For these reasons, the main objective of this essay will be to analyze the different regulations in California, one of the states with most regulations when it comes to guns, and Arizona, one of the states with the less regulated gun usage. The main categories that will be examined are the types of restrictions and people who can and cannot own or carry a gun, their requirements that they demand in order to have or use a gun and finally, their rules that they have

The right to bear arms is guaranteed in the constitution by the Second Amendment. Liberals are looking to amend the constitution any way they can. They want to ban handguns or at least restrict sales. Studies have shown that gun control cannot stop people from committing the crime.

As of October 30, 2017, there are more than 50,000 people who were shot in America (Gun Violence Archive, 2017); this makes gun control an exceedingly prevalent policy. The multitude of deaths due to firearms causes Americans to constantly question if it's time to be stricter on gun control or sustain the same policy. People who are against gun control use the Second Amendment and self-defense as their argument to obtain firearms more easily. However, people who are for gun control use gun statistics such as crime rates to argue that gun access should be more limited. When looking at the gun control debate, there are several different factors to consider before taking a side: The Second Amendment, the gun market, gun violence, and self-defense.

The second amendment in the United States constitution, written in 1787, comprises “the right to keep and bear arms” (Cornell Law). Two hundred and thirty years later, Americans still actively practice that right. In spite of the fact that gun control is a divided debate, there are many reasons why there should be gun laws put in place. More than 33,000 people die from gun-related deaths in the USA every year, and that number has only been increasing (Everytown Research). Crime, domestic violence, suicide, and terrorism are major situations that are caused by the casual gun laws of America. The current gun laws set in place in the United States create major public health and safety issues for everyone in the country because of the fact that guns are too accessible to American households without proper qualifications.

Recently there has been an increase in high profile tragedies and puts in question if the government should reform its firearm laws. This is one of the most widely debated issue in the media currently. Both sides have strong opinions, those who are for more regulation believe that additional steps to be able to access a firearm is strongly needed. While others believe that if the government adds more restriction then that would be a violation of the second amendment.

Today gun control issues still receive attention from the United States public. Many changes have been made regulating the manufacturing, transporting, and selling of firearms in the United States since 1791. Immediately after the tragedy of Sandy Hook Elementary school, lawmakers started arguing for gun control in the U.S. hoping that it would bring the country more security.. The Second Amendment of the Constitution states “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Therefore no one will be able to take away the people’s right to protect themselves and others. While some parts of society believe that guns should be removed from citizens and criminals, law enforcement will still be armed. Instead of trying to remove guns from citizens, there needs to be more of an effort to contain criminals ability to obtain these weapons.