Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

The second amendment states that right to keep and bear arms. This law has been etched in the United States history for centuries thus creating the highly popularized debate whether they should be gun control laws. Members and advocates of the National Rifle Association would argue against gun control. Their aim is to shift the focus away from guns and their destructive potential but instead have people focus on the criminal and shift the argument to them being mentally incapable or suggest that there is a lack of security within schools (Henigan 2009). Voices of the NRA do make valid points, however it prevents them from seeing the bigger picture. We as a society have drifted from the crux of the issue, which is, when put simply, guns are dangerous. In America, guns are extremely dangerous. Anyone who chooses to Google “gun violence statistics” and find the official research study done by the National Institute of Justice it would show you that 15 of the 25 worst mass shootings in the last 50 years took place in America. It also vividly reminds us of how guns are easily obtained. The mass shootings that took place in America over the last

According to Nicholas Kristof’s article “our blind spot about guns” gun control is a lot like cars regulation such that if we can regulate cars we can regulate guns. It took a lot of time and effort but thanks to regulations cars are safer than they were many years ago, and the same is very possible with guns. We need to keep our country safe. The first steps to gun control are improving on background checks and also requiring trigger locks on all guns.

October 1, 2017 marked the deadliest mass shooting in modern U.S. history. With almost 500 injured and 58 killed, not only did Las Vegas feel the tragedy of a personal loss, but the incident had rippling effects that shook all of America (Flaherty). With the fresh wounds of the recent Las Vegas shooting, politician's initial reaction is to implement more strict gun restrictions and "lay down the law" to prevent a similar event from happening again. Due to the drastic laws being carried out, the topic of gun control is a current issue in society. Is the solution to implement more firm restrictions on gun ownership or can the government allow the people to be their own advocates? While the opposing views of pro-gun restrictions argue that is up to the discretion of the government, they are often narrow-minded resolutions with no hope to finding a real solution. This particular shooter obtained his guns legally and passed all background checks, going unnoticed until his plan unfolded. Establishing more strict firearm restrictions would not have stopped the Las Vegas shooting from occurring. The number of gun restrictions can not increase, the government needs to either fix the existing laws or do away with gun restrictions entirely. Gun restrictions are not the solution because guns are not doing the killing--people are, the laws only attack the law-abiding citizens, and the gun restrictions add another infringed upon right that the government controls. While voting against additional gun rules will not completely eliminate the controversy behind this topic, voting against these laws will be a milestone to regaining the rights we have already been promised.

October, 1st 2017 has marked the latest in a now all too familiar trend of tragedies; a mass killing of civilians by a sick individual. In the wake of this tragedy, there is a mass of human emotion, grief, anger, sadness, and a demand for justice to right what has been wronged. In looking for justice, one needs an antagonist to blame, in this case an object, the gun. While it is true that firearms are the weapon of choice for many violent tragedies across the United States, will a ban on firearms truly solve the problem of violence for the country? Although a firearm ban may seem like a preventative for violence in the United States, a comparison of violent crime in other countries with varying levels of gun control, the lack of

Raise your hand if you have ever been victimized by a gun or know someone who has lost their life due to a firearm. Realize that if gun control laws in the united states were more strictly enforced a lot less of us will be raising our hands right now. The United States has a problem with gun violence. Great mass shootings and also school shootings have occurred in the past few years, bringing a great grief to America. Parents are scared to send their children to school or even attend any type of event due to these horrific events that have happened. Some Americans even want to ban the right to bear arms.

Gun control in the United States was first introduced in 1934 when legislation was drafted and passed in 1934 to impose new criminal penalties, along with regulations and taxes, on the machine guns and sawed-off shotguns preferred by the era's most notorious gangsters, largely in response to the bloody gun violence carried out by the likes of Al Capone and Bugs Moran. Congress added to the National Firearms Act with another round of new laws four years later. The Federal Firearms Act of 1938 put restrictions on the interstate guns and ammunition trade. It required, in many cases for the first time, for dealers to register themselves and keep records of their transactions (Kreig 6). Those laws were the first to cause debate and arguments about limiting guns and gun use for Americans. Gun control is the regulation of the selling, owning, and use of guns. This issue is so important because it could affect the use of firearms in this country and have an impact on the safety of our citizens and others around the world. It’s been a prevalent debate in American politics with many differing opinions. The debate even stretched past

“A series of terror attacks that killed more than 120 people, ISIS claimed responsibility for the horrific Paris attacks,” (Castillo and et. al.). Even though more guns will give more chances of murders, will more gun control laws stop people by getting them, will we be safer without legal guns, and why should we give up our right to bear arms.

In the wake of the shooting in Las Vegas this year, there have been more tension around gun-control than ever. This shooting has inspired a new wave of people to argue over whether or not the United States needs new gun laws, one side argues that we need more restrictions on the owning of guns, the other side that it's a citizen's right to own a gun and to take that away is unconstitutional. In this paper, I will first give a rundown of the history of laws concerning gun control, then I will talk about whether or not America should pass more gun laws then I will address how this relates to previous cases involving gun control.

With being at the heels of the Vegas mass shooting, the deadliest mass shooting in United States history, anti-gun advocates are out in full force. Being a gun owner myself, I am worried that my guns for hunting and self-defense are in jeopardy. The implementation of the controversial gun control concept has been casually taken part in a numerous amount of political debates throughout the course of time. If this act is potentially taken to action in the United States, it will stir up a large dispute as it will take away the whole concept of the Second Amendment allowing the right of the people to keep and bear arms. With attempts to achieve the vision of a gun-free America by appealing the emotions of a hurting nation, society seems to be

Lately, there has been a controversy about gun control due to an increase is gun crime. With all the crimes throughout the years, many people don't know if we should have more laws for firearms or no more than what we have now. Within the last year, there has been about 53,000 incidents alone, but the year before was about 52,000 so not much of a difference of the two years. With mass shooting between the years 2014-2015 here is the only difference of eighty that had occurred and been reported, but yet with the accidental shootings, they are about equal with 2,000 that were reported (Past summary ledgers). The number of deaths that happened in 2015 was around 13,000 and in 2014, it was 1,000 less than that within the year gap. The new laws not only affect the people who oppose firearms but

Did you know that in America, less than 1% of all deaths are caused by any type of firearm? Though people agree that all Firearms have the potential to cause harm to people some believe that If more people carry and have guns, then the risk of harm from guns will go down and others that if all gun owners were required to turn in their guns then the risk will be lessened. Some say that the laws concerning firearms need to be less restrictive on a national scale, while others say that gun laws need to be more restrictive and should be made by states.

Over the past decade, gun control raised controversy upon the American people and changed the way people foresee firearms. Most of these controversies still continue to be brought up today. The Second Amendment of the Bill of Rights states that “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” In January of 2016, Obama stated his gun control plan that would more strictly enforce existing laws including firearms. People deserve the right to have firearms for the ability to protect, defend, and entertain themselves and others. The biggest controversy including firearms is the way people are introduced and informed about them. People are given the thought that “guns kill people,” when in all reality, “people kill people.” Although there are around 10,000 people killed in the United States each year from firearms, guns are not the main conflict in the killings, the people behind the guns are.

In America, gun’s have been used since we became united as a country. Even the constitution made the people of the United states have the right to bear arms. However, this does not make it right. They have been used beyond for what they were meant for. ¨When there's a bombing, we blame the bomber. When there's a drunk-driving accident, we blame the driver. Why.-pause-.[is it when there is] a shooting, we blame the gun.” The amount of violence committed with a gun is caused by the shooter, not the gun itself. Some may have the opinion that guns are responsible for the violent crimes committed with them; however, if those involved in the crime did not have a gun, the violent act would not have occurred. -quote-“This theory holds that thousands of gun murders [are committed] by law-abiding citizens who might have stayed law-abiding if they had not possessed firearms,” (Kates, Don B.)-end of quote-.

There should be more laws enforced when it comes to gun control. There are good reasons to limit gun control, and to have them. The right to bear arms is guaranteed in our Constitution, therefore cannot be completely removed from people. Although,there​ ​should​ ​be​ ​stricter policies​ ​when​ ​anyone​ ​is​ ​purchasing​ ​a​ ​gun.​ ​Such​ ​as​ ​background​ ​checks,waiting​ ​periods​ ​to receive​ ​firearms,​ ​strong​ ​handgun​ ​regulations​ ​and​ ​a​ ​required​ ​safe​ ​firearm​ ​storage​ ​under​ ​the federal​ ​law. The Second Amendment protects an individual's right to own guns. Guns are intended for self-defense for threats from any sort of criminal. In America 22% of people are owners of one or more guns.The gun control law states that the Second Amendment is intended for militias. That there has always been gun restrictions, including gun owners and support new gun restrictions. Some people will oppose to the idea for more laws to enforce gun control. One idea is that making it more difficult to legally purchase a weapon will make a person unarmed and vulnerable. Another con idea is that no matter what laws are created evil people will do evil things. The right to carry laws have been on the rise since the 1990s, violent crimes have decreased. The number for gun owners has risen by about 100 million. There needs to be more laws enforced when it comes to gun control. Some may say that the public awareness for gun control grew after John F. Kennedy’s assassination.

here is an appalling, despicable lack of gun control in the United States. In my opinion the manner in which the issue of gun control is approached in this country is bordering on criminal negligence in and of itself. The insanity surrounding this controversial issue is taking the Second Amendment to the Bill of Rights in the United States constitution way too far. I ask myself this question, could the Founding Fathers of this amazing country have possibly envisioned a world in which teenagers could casually walk into a classroom, pull out a loaded pistol and cold bloodily murder their teachers and fellow classmates? I think not. I would posit that these fine men, these symbols of American liberty and democracy would turn in their graves if they could see how their words, their intentions, were manipulated and grossly misinterpreted, to serve the purposes of those who pretend to be protecting the rights of their fellow American Citizens. On the contrary, it is my belief that they, the politicians, are recklessly endangering those whose rights they claim to be protecting. The Government needs to take a hard, honest look at the tragic loss of life that occurs in this country due to gun shootings, both intentional and accidental. The government needs to assume responsibility for this outrageous situation and realize that gun control in the United States needs to be Federally regulated, sooner rather than later.