Persuasive Essay On Gun Control

According to Nicholas Kristof’s article “our blind spot about guns” gun control is a lot like cars regulation such that if we can regulate cars we can regulate guns. It took a lot of time and effort but thanks to regulations cars are safer than they were many years ago, and the same is very possible with guns. We need to keep our country safe. The first steps to gun control are improving on background checks and also requiring trigger locks on all guns.

This country has a mental health issue. We don't want to talk about it because it makes us look vulnerable. There is no law that can fix this, you could literally go door to door and take every single firearm in this country and we would still see tragedies like this occurring. We have a shit ton of people in this country and people like to kill each other, it's just the way this works for some reason. The reality of it is this; these public shooters are more or less a statistical anomaly. They're comparatively rare in a country where people constantly use illegally-acquired firearms to commit murders every day.

Raise your hand if you have ever been victimized by a gun or know someone who has lost their life due to a firearm. Realize that if gun control laws in the united states were more strictly enforced a lot less of us will be raising our hands right now. The United States has a problem with gun violence. Great mass shootings and also school shootings have occurred in the past few years, bringing a great grief to America. Parents are scared to send their children to school or even attend any type of event due to these horrific events that have happened. Some Americans even want to ban the right to bear arms.

Those that support the tightening of gun regulations use the increasing number of gun ownerships and gun-related incidents to argue their side. Recent studies show that approximately half of the homes in the United States possess a total of 223 million firearms (Bitto). Because of the high percentages of firearm ownerships, those that encourage tighter gun restrictions agree that the likeliness of such a weapon being used for crime is dramatically increased. 68% of fatal attacks from 2006 were completed with the usage of a gun (“Perhaps the 2nd…”),

Imagine a woman being stalked by a predator outside of her home. Over a few days, she tells the police and files a report, but the problem persists. She fears for her life and tries to find a way to protect herself and her loved one. As a last resort, she travels to her local gun store because she needs to buy a gun for her safety. Unfortunately, the cashier explains that she’ll need to wait for her gun because there is a waiting period to receive her firearm. She begs and pleads and tells the cashier her situation and all the things she has tried, but the man can’t break the law for her. Reluctantly, she gives in and heads back to her unsafe home, only to be later assaulted and killed before her weapon could get to her in time. This type of situation happens unfortunately to some people, and it is because gun control laws have implemented waiting periods to receive your weapon. But that however, is just one of the many gun control laws that should be abolished in order to take a step forward towards a better society.

One afternoon on December 11, 2012 normal, loyal citizens were going about their day, shopping for what they needed. All was fine until lound sounds were heard across the mall. This was not any loud sound, it was a gunshot. People rushing to cover, protecting their children and loved ones from the firing of a gun. Two lives of poor innocent civilians were coldly taken away from their bodies, and one of them on the floor with a critical injury. The man was named Jacob Roberts, a cold blooded murderer, firing at everything that moved, but then it suddenly stopped. Someone told him to leave, and he retreated. The man who asked him to leave is named Nick Meli. He held up his gun to Roberts and made him retreat and he did in fear of getting shot. If it wasn’t for someone having a gun to stop him, many more people would have died (Bella). This is not the only time when someone is saved by their gun; for example the New Life Church Shooting, the trolley square shooting, and the San Antonio Theater Shooting where all stopped by a civilian stopping the shooter before he murders more people (Broderick). If Congress passes stricter gun laws, it will be a grave mistake because it will take away guns from loyal, honest citizens, make victims of homicide more vulnerable, and while trying to stop mass shootings by banning guns, Congress will benefit the economy of the black market.

The topic of gun control seems to be split into two different opinions for the most part. Some people believe there should not be strict government regulations on most guns because it is part of the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. This amendment states, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." @@@ Most people who support the 2nd amendment believe that the government should not be allowed to impinge on the public’s right to own and use guns. On a completely other note, some people believe the government needs to step in and regulate guns. Some areas that people believe need regulating can include how guns are obtained, how many one person can own, and the type of guns that can be sold to the public. In my own opinion, even though some Americans believe access to guns help protect people and is a right, there should be heavy regulations on large capacity weapons and magazines put in place to help decrease the amount of gun-related violence in America.

Lately, there has been a controversy about gun control due to an increase is gun crime. With all the crimes throughout the years, many people don't know if we should have more laws for firearms or no more than what we have now. Within the last year, there has been about 53,000 incidents alone, but the year before was about 52,000 so not much of a difference of the two years. With mass shooting between the years 2014-2015 here is the only difference of eighty that had occurred and been reported, but yet with the accidental shootings, they are about equal with 2,000 that were reported (Past summary ledgers). The number of deaths that happened in 2015 was around 13,000 and in 2014, it was 1,000 less than that within the year gap. The new laws not only affect the people who oppose firearms but

Among industrialized countries, the United States has the highest rates of firearm suicide and homicide, as well as the highest rate of gun ownership. (Kaplan 1227-1233) The question among many people is whether or not stricter gun control laws would indeed reduce the number of homicides in America, many try and relate the situation here in the US to Australia and say that because stricter laws worked for Australia, then it will also be the same for the US. In the wake of so many recent mass shooting tragedies people are searching for answers and resolutions, but because it is such a polarizing issue, people tend to be split with their opinions. Gun control may be the answer for many countries, but it is not the answer for America.

Gun control has been a highly controversial issue for the past several decades. Gun control is a very broad term, and can have many different interpretations. Some individuals believe gun control will ban the use and possession of firearms all together. Others may believe it just bans certain parts of a gun such as high capacity magazines, silencers, and flash suppressors. Both interpretations above are forms gun control. However, the true definition of gun control is “regulation of selling, owning, and using guns” (merriam-webster.com). Placing more restrictions on purchasing, owning, and using firearms is an ineffective way to end gun violence. Gun control will be ineffective because it will violate the second amendment, federal and state laws have already proven to be ineffective, and increased restrictions will not prevent mass shootings. Before getting into how gun control is ineffective, some commonly misused firearm terminology should be presented.

As time goes on American society continues to believe they are more protected if they have a gun, and as long as gun violence continues this trend will continue as well. For someone to fear crime it consists of two assumptions: first, that people’s fear of crime motivates them to buy a gun for protection; and second, that mass shootings increase people’s fear of crime (Stroebe, et al., 2017).  This creates a cycle that is not good for anybody, more and more people will purchase out of fear and these guns can end up in anyone’s hands.

A controversial topic in today’s society is gun control. Gun control is not just one issue, it consists of many. Americans feel that the government is slowly taking control of their entire lives. Gun control, a topic that has been debated in government law making for a myriad of years, has been controversial to United State citizens who feel their right to bear arms is now infringed upon by government.

After every highly publicized mass shooting, the topic of gun control becomes a political hot potato being juggled by the senators, congressman, and even the sitting president of the United States. It followed the usual pattern of condemning the shooter, questioning the ease in which the shooter was able to obtain guns, and with most mass shootings, proposing a ban on assault files used in the shooting. But within a few months, when the news agencies move onto other headlines, when all the hashtags on Twitter fall out of use, we forget about the gun control measures we were so passionate about and move on with our daily lives. This is when the lawmakers backed by pro-second amendment constituents swoop in and briskly cut down the proposed

The right to own and use guns is what the United States was built on and guns made America what it is today. America got their independence with the help of guns. Most people use their guns for hunting and for the protection of themselves and others. Americans should be able to have guns and that shouldn’t be infringed, but there should be laws to make things safer.

Guns can protect you in various occasion because imagine yourself walking lonely in a street full of thugs and one comes up to you, and points a gun to your head. People should be able defend themselves. In the past few years there has been many mass shootings carried out by mental people, and gun owners are paying the consequences by the government restricting gun laws even more. Guns don’t kill, people kill. Mexico has one of the rigorous gun control laws on the world and yet they’ve massive shootings. They only have one legal gun store and it is under extreme surveillance. In the other hand, The United States has an easy access to guns, and they’ve several shootings. The United States has more than 50,000 legal gun stores. In few words, the Mexican government has some of the strictest laws for the acquisition of weapons. These are not respected and, therefore, in the United States it will be the same because there are many gaps in the laws. These gaps in gun control can be used by society as best suits their interests. We should not lose the right to bear arms because these weapons provide safety, deter crime, and Second Amendment guarantees us the right to bare arms.