Persuasive Essay On Human Cloning

What was once thought to be the content of fiction novels and comic books is now being fully explored and realized in the cutting edge world of modern science. Scientists now possess the necessary capabilities and technology to make the process of human cloning a reality. While this is a controversial and rather sensitive topic, cloning is an innovative practice that has the potential to vastly improve the lives of unlimited amounts of people. Although cloning may prove to be a useful remedy for many of today’s issues, there are those in the scientific and medical fields who remain vehemently opposed to its practice. It is for this reason that lawmakers, scientists, and doctors around the world are currently locked in a fierce standoff

In 1885, there was the first ever demonstration of artificial embryo cloning of a sea urchin. While that is a relatively noncomplex organism, by 1996 scientist in Scotland where able to clone a sheep, a mammal, through somatic cell nuclear transfer. Everyday there is some kind of scientific break through but they are not all good. It took them two hundred seventy seven failures to create the sheep. The ethical issues are not where it stops; if government where able to clone humans it could lead to the construction of super soldiers, genetically modifies humans, which could lead to war on a global scale. So the United States should have stricter laws on research into human cloning to avoid a war the could wipe out the entire planet.

The study of genetics has always been wondrous and new discoveries are regularly being found. Especially the idea of human cloning has spread so far that it brings up emotion and triggers debates. This concept which once was a dream now has turned into something that can be worked on. Animal cloning was the first type of cloning that was successful and this occurred significantly when Dolly the sheep was born. This is because although animal cloning was happening since 1952, Dolly was important as this was the first time when a clone of a mammal had been made. But if looked at human cloning history, no such progress has been made as when human cloning is brought up, it raises emotional and ethical concerns.

On February 27, 1997, it was reported that scientists produced the first clone of an adult sheep, attracting international attention and raising questions on the morality of cloning. Within days, the public had called for ethics inquires and new laws banning cloning. Issues are now raised over the potentially destructive side of this scientific frontier. Many people are morally opposed to the possible consequences of women being able to give birth to themselves, or scientists seeking to clone "genetically superior" humans. Others argue that the positive effects of cloning will outweigh the negative. The issue over whether cloning humans is ethical is receiving more and more attention as scientists successfully

Since the 1970’s cloning has been a topic of debate with politicians, churches, scientist and many others. Some important questions need to be asked and understood. What exactly is cloning? Are there different types of cloning? What is the moral or ethical consequences to cloning? Are there any problems or effects associated with cloning? The final question would be, what effects would cloning have on the legal or medical fields? Before anyone can make a stand for or against cloning they should be educated on the processes and outcomes. With answering these questions and material covered my Gregory Pence, my stand on cloning is clear.

Human cloning has always been a highly controversial issue. To be able to clone a human or not be able to? That is the question. Some believe human cloning is the next step in science and should be something worthy of experimenting on; conversely, others think human cloning is unethical and shouldn’t be something scientists should be studying. Human cloning could have many problems and shouldn’t be experimented on.

Human cloning has the potential to cure cancer, replace organs, eliminate infertility, and significantly increase recovery time for patients who have experienced traumatic events. Despite all these groundbreaking benefits, human cloning has not been applied to the medical world. Human cloning has failed to be accepted, because of the ethical issues it presents. Human cloning brings up the issue of religion and whether or not it is allowed throughout different practices. It asks questions such as, do clones have souls, is cloning equivalent to immortality, will it be costly, is it guaranteed to produce results. While the benefits of human cloning are revolutionary, the side-effects can be damaging.

People are often fearful of the unknown, and more so, the consequences thereof. Although human cloning takes a significant step toward the evolution of science, it alters what many see as the natural way of human reproduction. A number of points have been brought to attention by both Patricia Baird and MacDonald. However, after careful contemplation the concept of human cloning should not be permitted. Such a statement can be concluded due to the fact that it is opposed by the majority of Americans, as well as taking into consideration the risks associated with human cloning that are yet to be fully understood. Furthermore, individuals who are cloned are perceived as products and are thus seen as commodities rather than authentic human beings.

A quote from an American Physician Hermann M. Biggs, states that “The human body is the only machine for which there are no spare parts.” Cloning is the process of duplicating an embryo, flesh or other parts of an organism. The thought of human cloning has been a hot topic ever since the birth of Dolly the cloned sheep. Dolly revolutionized the advancement of cloning and science in general. Now a days, scientists have been researching stem cells for medical treatment. Also, scientists have been trying to develop a successful human clone embryo. Their research has led to some scientists claiming that they have successfully created a human embryo by cloning, but it turned out to be a hoax. While scientists try to create human clones, society is in an everlasting conflict between ethical standards. Some believe cloning should be outright prohibited. However, others

Members of society, from both the public and private sectors, feared the side effects of cloning a human and they feared the power that these scientists could obtain if they were ever to create child clone that survived birth. This fear is one of the reasons that in March of 2005 the United Nations General Assembly voted to adopt a Declaration on Human Cloning. The Declaration on Human Cloning prohibited all forms of human cloning inasmuch as they are incompatible with human dignity and the protection of human life (GENERAL, 2005). This declaration is still in place today, making it illegal to do any kind of research or experiments towards cloning using any type of human cells or embryos anywhere in the United Nations. This had no effect on the United States and so the research and experiments here are still legal and are still being conducted

If a random individual were asked twenty years ago if he/she believed that science could clone an animal, most would have given a weird look and responded, “Are you kidding me?” However, that once crazy idea has now become a reality, and with this reality, has come debate after debate about the ethics and morality of cloning. Yet technology has not stopped with just the cloning of animals, but now many scientists are contemplating and are trying to find successful ways to clone human individuals. This idea of human cloning has fueled debate not just in the United States, but also with countries all over the world. I believe that it is not morally and ethically right

around the world on whether or not to ban cloning humans. With the advancement of

Cloning is the process of manipulating DNA and embryonic stem cells to create an identical living organism. The purpose of cloning is to find medical treatments and to reduce human suffering (Rosalyn). Is it wrong? Is it disrespectful toward nature itself? According to Sir John Gordon, cloning is not as playing God it is simply copying “what nature has already produced” (Gordon). This new development established a series of debates because if there are technologies that enable humans to artificially create mammal, sooner or later the same process will be performed on human. This points to the question, should human cloning be banned? (Cloning: An Overview). Even though there are numerous critics who believe human cloning

Many people have asked, "Why would anyone want to clone a human being?" There are at least two good reasons: to allow families to conceive twins of exceptional individuals, and to allow childless couples to reproduce. In a free society we must also ask, "Are the negative consequences sufficiently compelling that we must prohibit consenting adults from doing this?" We will see that in general they are not. Where specific abuses are anticipated, these can be avoided by targeted laws and regulations, which I will suggest below.

Many ethical and moral dilemmas arise when discussing human cloning, and one can have many positions for and against each. To understand the issues surrounding human cloning, one must have a basic