Persuasive Essay On Marinette Wear Uniforms

Is it right that Donald Trump bans Transgenders that have the capability to fight and train like everyone else? Serving for the military is a great opportunity that has been taken away from Transgenders, that deserve that opportunity, and here’s three reasons that Transgenders should be able to serve. Three reasons why Transgenders should stay in the military are they shouldn’t be kicked out and deployed out of the military despise their gender. The military will lose approximately 15,000 active troops that were doing an amazing job at serving our country. Finally, because the Donald Trump claims that the medical cost is too much, but training and getting troops up to readiness standards will cost more money.

As the temperature rises, so do hemlines and the suspension rate. Students get suspended for violating school dress codes by wearing outfits that ‘show too much skin.’ One can argue that revealing clothing is distracting, but some families and students agree that school dress code implementations end up just shaming girls. Dress codes, the epitome of high school, teach girls to act ashamed, not modest. According to most school boards that come up with the dress code, the outfits young women wear come across as too distracting for their peers, especially men, and make it unable for women to be viewed by the public with dignity and respect. Everyday, school dress codes target females—especially females that are more developed.

In this essay I will describe the many requirements and expectations set forth in the army's AR670-1. I will describe the importance of obedience to it and cite many of it's detailed descriptions. I am writing this essay because I failed to meet the standards asked of me me by both these regulations, and my leadership. I accept the responsibility of my actions and will not let my failure recur, nor will I let my fellow soldiers repeat my mistake. Since my failure was in regards to grooming or personal additions to uniform, I thought it would be pertinent to cover these subjects most thoroughly, If any additional information is required of me I will add on to this.

Every day, there are American citizens who risk their lives for the sake of their country's safety. Men and women who believe that justice, peace, and equality should be served. However, within their beliefs, some choose to exclude transgender individuals who have the same rights and freedoms. The American society considers the world to be progressively changing and growing, however, seem to forget that in order for the military to survive the 21st century, diversity is crucial. Although the medical costs may raise the overall healthcare median per year, transgender individuals should have the right to serve in the U.S. armed forces because any human being who meets the physical qualifications and has a willing attitude should have the right to serve.

The United states national anthem, The Star-Spangled Banner, states: "Land of the free, home of the brave." This patriotic song adopted by the United States as our national anthem to express our nation's identity is no longer justified in relations with females being required to be drafted into the military. The word required emphasizes that this is not the "land of the free" because the United States is making it a requirement for citizens to be forced into the military out of their own free will. Furthermore, the anthem states "home of the brave", but people are not being brave when they are being forced. Bravery means having courage and being ready to face anything that comes your way, but if the military is making it a requirement to those

simple but strong question within his poem: “When was the last time you saw a pigeon in

The fate of the cat’s life is still unknown. At this point, the author points out that “[t]he kitchen light came on,

“Birds bring beauty into the world,” Mrs, Bundy tells a distraught Melanie Daniels. But do they? In the film,”The Birds,” directed by Albert Hitchcock, Melanie Daniels chase's lawyer Mitch Brenner to the small town of Bodega Bay, gifting him a pair of lovebirds for his sister. Melanie however, gets caught up in the rampant bird problem that plagues the town when she arrives. Hitchcock creates suspense in the movie by using the element of dramatic irony, in order to instill a sense of helplessness into the audience as they watch disaster unfold before the characters of the picture.

The pigeon, Jake was utilized by Stephen King as a symbolism for freedom. Jake has wings that can fly anywhere he wants. Jake can fly through small cell in the wall. “Some birds are not meant to be caged” (King100), the bird refers to Andy, who was not meant to be caged. Andy was innocent from the crime that he was imprisoned for. He was not supposed to go to prison and loose his freedom. Jake was claimed by a man named Sherwood Bolton. However a day prior to his

The Awakening utilizes symbolism to reflect the character of Edna as she’s living an independent life that is free from her family and societal norms. As a result, Edna’s development as a more autonomous character is reflected because of symbolism, such as the caged bird that represents her entrapped life, Mademoiselle Reisz’s piano playing that opens up her artistic creativity, and the waves that drag her into freeing her own life. At the beginning of the story, a caged parrot is introduced as an annoyance to Leonce. For example, the book says, “A green and yellow parrot, which hung in a cage outside the door, kept repeating over and over: ‘Allez vous-en!

Another thing about pigeons, is that they are beautiful creatures that can be seen from power lines and in large fields too. The last part about being controlled by the MOB is because there is a good side about it because this is when Terry is feeding the pigeons, he is happy, and he is away from the MOB.

At the bird’s appearance and apparent vocal articulation, he is at first impressed, then saddened. He compares this evening visitor as only another friend which will soon depart, just as “other friends have flown before” (58). But the raven again echoes quite aptly his one-word vocabulary, thus leading the man on to think more deeply about the possibilities that exist at this juncture. Somewhere deep inside him, he has realized that it doesn’t matter what question he poses, the bird will respond the same.

Norman’s psychotic ways are also revealed through Hitchcock’s use of motifs. His repeated use of birds have an underlying meaning of Norman’s dangerousness. His hobby is avian taxidermy and in numerous shots birds are displayed in the background. A shot of when the mise en scene evokes his eerie connection towards his hobby is in the parlor. The parlor is decorated with his stuffed trophy birds mounted on the walls or on stands - an enormous predatory, nocturnal owl with outstretched wings, and a raven. Both owl and raven are in frame lurking behind Norman and representing his concealed character. Like the owl, he is a predator, in full attack mode on Marian. He also doesn’t wait until the daytime to kill her, he slays her in the shower at night like a nocturnal psychopath. As if with the raven’s knife like beak, Norman murdered Marian, following in the footsteps of killing when it is easiest.

Students struggle throughout high school and go through a great deal of stress. Whether it be making friends, or working hard to pass a difficult class. To make things more pressuring, they are not allowed to wear what they want. The administration made the decision that it is best to suspend a student for their choice in clothing. If they go against the rule of dress code, there will be serious consequences. What students wear should not affect their class work. If a student gets sent home for their outfit, it is affecting their grades and attendance. Punishment disrupts the students education more than what they are wearing. High school students should feel free to embrace their individuality without being pressured by dress codes; therefore, it should be eliminated from all schools indefinitely.

Further into the novel, the birds' behavior corresponds to Susan's early adulthood, her prime, and her middle age.  The birds sing alone, "stridently . . . as if the song were urged out of them . . . as if the edge were being sharpened."  They [descend] dry-beaked, ruthless, abrupt" (109), soar in high flights, observe, sever upon encountering a rock.  Susan, hating London, comes dowdily dressed--"like a creature dazed by the light of a lamp" (119)--to Percival's farewell dinner.  At this reunion she learns that Bernard, whom she loves, has become engaged.  Susan thinks that "something irrevocable has happened. . . .  We shall never flow freely again" (142).  The sun rises to its full height; the birds' "passionate songs addressed to one ear only" (149) stop; they build nests.  Word arrives that Percival, who has loved Susan, has died in India.  Susan, engaged to a farmer, shows momentary anger at the news.  The sun no longer stands in the middle of the sky; the birds sit still and pause in their song "as if glutted with sound, as if the fullness of midday had gorged them" (165).  Susan sees the seasons