Persuasive Essay On Media Bias

Media has been playing a significant role in our daily lives by developing our personalities, enriching our knowledge and providing us with different sorts of information. It has a tremendous power in framing cultural guidelines and shaping political dissertation. If the information provided to the U.S. citizens is distorted, then they cannot make informed decisions on the matters of public policy. Thus, it becomes vital to the American democracy that the news media and its institutions remain unbiased, fair and accurate. Media bias happens when a media systematically and persistently emphasize one particular point of view that is usually below the standards of professional journalism. There can be various reasons for media bias, some of

”The world is not responding to events in this country, but rather to the description of these events by news organizations. The key to understanding the strange nature of the response is thus to be found in the practice of journalism….” (Friedman, 2014)

The aim of my literature review is to investigate and study the hypothesis that the more a specific news media outlet prefers a particular candidate, the more likely the person viewing that media outlet will vote for that candidate. Media bias is any media outlet exposing a partisan view within news story coverage and gives one side of the political spectrum an advantage through immanent reporting by selective display of perspectives and facts. The news media is defined as a media outlet that provides political news coverage in print or television format, this includes print and outline newspapers, and broadcasting television news stations. Several liberals and conservatives write about the existence of media bias. They each express that media bias exists against the other. Whether the news media strengthens public opinion or simply shapes it, media outlets are considered to have strong effects on voters. The power of media bias is examined by scholars who show how it effects election outcomes and voter perceptions.

During the recent 2016 presidential election, candidates Bernie Sanders and Hillary Clinton could be seen glorified on the television screens of an MSNBC segment. On the other hand, viewing Fox News reveals a very noticeable conservative bias, favoring ideology from candidates like Donald Trump, Ben Carson, and John Kasich. CNN, thought to be the most neutral of the three, is only considered unbiased because it always has “at least one conservative and one liberal pundits” reporting on an issue (Garcia). News media rarely provides information unbiasedly, there seems to be some sort of political leaning to almost every news report. Although biased news allows for more perspectives and grants more information to the audience, the extent to which

Media bias is a topic that has been in great focus of many political leaders over the past few presidential elections. However, what many people fail to see is that media bias has been around since the beginning of major news companies. Most Americans do not know what media bias is or how to identify it. That stated many people have noticed that most news stations are biased towards one religion, political party or even gender. This has been like this for decades however has become much more prominent during major wars, the great depression and many social and political reforms such as the industrial era or the civil rights era. However the type of bias has been shifted mostly from a war focus and the focus on exposing corruption to

The news is a major source of information used by many people in order to gain knowledge on current events. However, it can become unreliable due to various media biases. These biases are used to make the news more plot driven in order to increase viewers and profits rather than providing in-depth analysis of pertinent issues. Media biases can be dangerous to society, and can give citizens a false view of what is going on in the world. They can strike fear into viewers, and make them believe that the world around them is much less safe then it actually is. In the CNN news clip Politicians Behaving Badly? and the Daily Show clip The Amazing Racism – Geographical Bigotry the media biases of authority-disorder and dramatization

The purpose of this essay is to explain how the media is biased and in what direction the bias leans towards. For a long time, there has been speculation that there is a liberal bias in the mass media. This is a problem because, “citizens cannot cast informed votes or make knowledgeable decisions on matters of public policy if the information on which they depend is distorted, it is vital to American democracy that television news and other media be fair and unbiased.” [1] Unfortunately, the information we receive in the news, campaigns, and other media are often portrayed to be or look a certain way, either to favor a particular political party, just make it look negative, or scare and the divide the public.

Though the misinterpretation and ignorance of honest news through perceptual bias is formed by individuals, it’s a shame that the remaining three-fourths of bias is deliberately carried out by reporters and journalists themselves. The main issue at hand is that journalists today feel that their own opinions are correct and superior to others; therefore, they are sure to only circulate information that will get citizens to see things their way, as opposed to giving an honest, impartial version of the truth. When asked if today’s media influences the opinions of citizens for better or for worse, Shane McNabb, a fellow news consumer, explains that “media outlets influence people when they have obvious biases. They tell you only what they want you to hear, and often out of context. This is often the case for both liberal and conservative outlets, and people end up either not knowing what to believe or taking on the opinion of the biased outlet”

The presence of media bias is an undeniable fact. I believe an objective news media outlet is basically nonexistent and that bias is unavoidable in society today. It’s natural for a writer or reporter’s point-of-view to be slightly evident in their work, but the true problem occurs when much of the reporters, anchors, writers, editors, and producers are undoubtedly of the same political opinion, with little to no diversity of opinion represented. Because of that reason, the media can deny their bias and do not have to make any effort to balance their view with any other opposing viewpoints. Reporters are intended to simply report the news. However, their personal opinions or the agendas of the network are reported as fact. Often, the position of major media outlets is extremely liberal, and they are known to use deliberate deceptive tactics, or to bluntly state their liberal opinions as fact.

For instance, California recently voted, and passed, the legalization of recreational marijuana. However, if a news station doesn’t report both the pros and cons of a certain vote, then, they are only megaphones for those in power (“How to Detect Bias”). In this case, if they don’t report the pros of legalizing marijuana people may want to vote differently then if they did. Often times most reporters are democrats, which may unintentionally lead to facts being left out, because they don’t support the other party. John Perazzo, the Managing Editor of DiscoverTheNetworks.com, said that, “It is exceedingly rare to find, even in the most heavily partisan voting districts in the United States, such pronounced imbalances in terms of votes cast or dollars earmarked for one party or the other” (Pezarro). Whatever the cause, media bias can often lead to unfair votes, or facts being

How dose bias apply to our media? In the list above I have seen first hand all of the seven violations of media objectivity. For some examples I would like to look at a few articles from the 2008 presidential election. On October 15, 2008, The New York Times and CBS both declared Barack Obama the winner of the 2008 presidential election. They didn’t do this in straight words they

Everywhere we look and listen there is bias. News stations and news reporters claim that they are unbiased by are they really? Brooke Gladstone’s, The Influencing Machine deciphers the different types of biases. News stations such as CNN report on politics and news related to politics. The New York Times reports on “breaking” news stories such as 9/11 or Boston Bombings. The Today reports on breaking news stories and stories for the family. Bias comes in all forms and shapes from the newspaper we read in the morning to the news we watch at night.

As discussed in class, one of the most influential agencies of socialization is the media. The way we see ourselves or the way other people see us come from what we are told by others and what we tell ourselves. In the Better world handbook, the chapter on media states that “the way we think and act in our daily lives is inextricably linked to the information we receive about the world” (Jones, Haenfler and Johnson). The chapter continues to discus how information delivered to us can be bias and this raises the issue on who controls the media and what we see through it. The problem with this could be that that whoever controls the media does not necessary have our best interest in mind and the content that is transmitted through the media is profit driven. . In the article “Lies my teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong” gives a perfect accept of how easy it is for information to get omitted based on what people what you to know and what they don’t want you to know. From a young age, people decide what they want you to know, so that they can decide on what they want you to think about certain topics whether its American history or something else, its like the

In today’s society, media is displayed throughout all over the internet and the way it is presented is not always honest towards the public. Authors like Cass Sunstein, Diana Mutz, and Alexis De Tueville all incorporate factual evidence onto how media is spread due to outside information which is distributed towards the democratic process. One involvement with the media was Russian involvement during the 2016 Presidential Election.

There are 7.442 billion people living on this planet as we speak. That is a very large number. Now let me give you a couple more numbers to go along with it. 70 million people; these are the individuals who live with an eating disorder every single day. 36.7 million; these are the people who live with HIV/AIDS in the world. The authors of the readings for which this argument comes from all agree that one of the main reasons that these epidemics have become so out of hand is the media involvement. I believe that if we were more educated about the subject matter at hand, we could find affordable working treatments that these individuals need. Media is the main problem for creating out of proportion ideas about illnesses that are truly a problem, but no a reason for people to divide. One side of the spectrum says that the media involvement should be limited, while the other side of the spectrum says that the media involvement should end. I believe that the media involvement should be both limited and ended in certain ways.