Persuasive Essay On Medically-Assisted Suicide

We are culturally ingrained from an early age that life is precious and each day is a gift. Life should not be squandered but preserved.  We are encouraged to live with a purpose, cherish our loved ones and live life to its fullest. But what if life becomes too physically painful to endure, often experienced by many terminally ill patients suffering an incurable disease, or a chronically ill elderly person who lacks the ability to thrive?  For forty-five day’s I watched my chronically ill mother languish away in a hospice care facility. The experience was emotionally and financially draining, and I began questioning whether a person should have the right to choose when and how to end their life. In the United States, assisted dying is a widely debated and passionate issue. Opponents argue preserving life, regardless of how much a person is suffering, is an ethical and moral responsibility, determined only by a higher power.  At the other end of the spectrum are those who support a person’s right to end their life with dignity at a time of their choosing.   Wouldn’t my mother’s suffering been greatly reduced if her doctor was legally and ethically permitted to administer a lethal cocktail of drugs to end her life quickly and painlessly? Wouldn’t the prevailing memory of my mother see her in a better light instead of helplessly watching her undignified death? To deny terminal and chronically ill people the freedom to end their

The word suicide gives many people negative feelings and is a socially taboo subject. However, suicide might be beneficial to terminally ill patients. Physician- assisted suicide has been one of the most controversial modern topics. Many wonder if it is morally correct to put a terminally ill patient out of their misery. Physicians should be able to meet the requests of their terminally ill patients. Unfortunately, a physician can be doing more harm by keeping someone alive instead of letting them die peacefully. For example, an assisted suicide can bring comfort to patients. These patients are in excruciating pain and will eventually perish. The government should not be involved in such a personal decision. A physician- assisted suicide comes with many benefits for the patient. If a person is terminally ill and wants a physician assisted suicide, then they should receive one.

B) According to the “ Journal of Medical Ethics” it may not be that simple to assist with

Who dictates how you live your life? How does one define life and when that life should end? If you become terminally ill, would you like the choice to choose how your life ends? In the United States, assisted suicide, is a highly-debated issue. On one side, there are many in support of allowing a person the right to end their life with dignity at the time of their choosing. While others believe, it is a moral right to sustain life and leave a person’s exit from this world to a higher power. The two opposing viewpoints have both compassionate reasons and disadvantages; nevertheless, a person’s human rights as an individual are the most important aspect to uphold.

In the ever changing role and dynamic atmosphere that healthcare provides, unique challenges and opportunities constantly arise which are a multi-faceted labyrinth of ethical and moral dilemma. One of the most contested and widely debated topics to be found in the healthcare workplace today is the subject of Assisted Suicide. Altering a person’s course of death into a process driven role, rather than the client’s final life event, creates a myriad of ethical and moral dilemmas.

Physician assisted suicide is an act of compassion that respects patient’s choice and fulfills an obligation of non-abandonment (Sulmasy & Mueller, 2017). Death is the inevitable end of life of a person or organism. As humans, we live the best way we can and with medicine and technology, humans can live a quality and healthy life-style. However, there is no human who is supernaturally immune from diseases and accidents.

Imagine living with a terminal illness that causes immense pain and suffering. It’s likely that many of us have not given it much thought. It’s much easier to believe that it won’t happen to us. The reality, however, is that people are diagnosed with these terrible illnesses every day. So, what options do patients have? For many years’, members of the medical community have discussed the practice of physician assisted suicide. This would allow terminally ill patients, many of whom have cancer, to make the difficult decision to end their lives peacefully. Doctors are able to simply write their patient a prescription, designed to end a person’s life in a non-painful way. Doctors and medical personnel have struggled with this topic, exploring the various consequences and benefits that come with making assisted suicide legal. Currently, physician assisted suicide has been made legal across a handful of states in the U.S; however, many people continue to question the ethicality of this practice. There are many different arguments to explore for and against physician assisted suicide. Some believe that physician assisted suicide will lead to involuntary euthanasia, while others say patients should have the choice to live or die. While each individual conviction may seem vastly different, they do share something in common: Their concern for the well-being of others.

Physician-assisted suicide is a very controversial topic in the medical field. It is a topic that has been debated over for years. Webster’s dictionary defines this terms as, “suicide by a patient facilitated by means (as a drug prescription) or by information (as an indication of a lethal dosage) provided by a physician aware of the patient’s intent” (Merriam-Webster). In other words, it is a way that when a patient is ill, they can commit suicide with the help of a physician. This practice is legal in some states in the United States and in many countries around the world. This topic is so controversial because people disagree on whether it is ethical to help someone end another person’s life. There are many people that advocate this and there are also many people that disagree with helping someone commit suicide.

A painful death is not a good one, wouldn’t you want to die a peaceful death? If you know you are going to die anyways wouldn’t you want it a lot more quickly and painless. The only person who can help these people are the doctors so you need the doctors to help these people who are suffering in their daily lives. Helping people this way is called doctor-assisted suicide. I believe that doctor-assisted suicide is okay and should be allowed because of.

“The value of the patient’s life does not depend on the patient’s subjective appreciation of it” (Social Conservatives). The debate over legalizing physician-assisted suicide in the United Sates has never been a simple one. Legalizing this practice diminishes compassionate treatment of pain because while palliative care is still available, assisted suicide encourages the elimination of patients themselves rather than of their suffering (Social Conservatives). Do not give one person the liberty to take the life of another (Procon.org). Although some advocates for assisted suicide argue that patients should be allowed a death with dignity, assisted suicide should not be legalized because all lives are valuable and legalizing this act will create

Imagine that someone that you love wanted to commit suicide. What would you do? Would you be able to stop them, or would you need to have professional help? Lives are lost everyday. Sometimes people choose to die by suicide while others may die in accidents. Whether people die by choice or by accident, they should know that God does not condone killing. Killing another is not justifiable in situations such as George and Lennie’s story, hunting for trophy, and committed suicide.

People have been known to go to any extent to end their suffering. Many have even contemplated, and successfully managed to commit suicide rather than continue living with their illness. One such example can be seen in the biography by John Hoffsess. He established ‘The right to die society’ and helped eight people die between 1999 and 2001. Suicide is a painful and demoralizing way to die, and the victims leave behind loved ones questioning themselves forever. Hofsess set up an underground society that allowed innovative non-medical options to die. He talks about how people suffering (those such as Al Purdy) who were members would die surrounded by loved ones than in a strange hospital bed. He used methods such as an ‘exit bag’ or lethal

Suicide is the act and the process of causing one’s own death with full knowledge and with the intention of doing so. The act has been considered as a crime in many countries and fully punishable by law to the suicide attempts. However, time has changed and many countries and particularly the USA are now in the process of changing the act to enable those suffering from severe and untreatable diseases to be in a position to choose death instead (Stump). The decision by the government to pass a legislation on assisted suicide has been welcomed by many, and as it stands it is the right way to go.

The debate over the use of euthanasia is ever growing. This is due to the fact of constant increases in medical advances. Medical advances are growing the number of medicines one can be given before palliative care is an option. The main concern of the debate is whether trying new treatments and medicines are necessary before palliative care is given. Two articles will be analyzed using the Aristotelian method. Both articles are valid, but the New York Times article written by Haider Javed Warraich offers a complete perspective using all three persuasive appeals compared to the article written by Terry Pratchett for The Guardian, which the majority is written on emotion.

In today’s world, almost everybody has a pet, we depend on them to give us comfort, love and care, vice versa but while we show our utmost affection to our pets, there are other pets in this world that get neglected and treated bad. About 3 million pets get euthanized each year because no one is able to adopt them. According to an article written on dallas news by Sarah Mervosh, she states “DAS (Dallas Animal Shelter) has successfully reduced euthanasia, despite being underfunded compared with other cities. About 60 percent of dogs get out of the shelter alive today -- up from 30 percent five years ago. Still, nearly 70 percent of the 8,500 or so dogs euthanized in Dallas last year were assessed as "treatable," meaning they were more adoptable than dogs with major health problems.” The number of euthanasia has gone down but our goal is to completely get rid of the concept of euthanizing pets since we believe that euthanization is a cruel thing to do and pets who are innocent and do not deserve this shouldn't be going through all of this that is why we at petco are taking matters into our own hands. Our initiative is to help underfunded animal shelters in the DFW metroPlex have better resources so that they can provide good care to pets that enter animal shelters each year. We are targeting four animal shelters that need our attention. Our goal is to bring in funds and other resources to animal shelters in need of support. To fulfill our dream of getting rid of any signs of