Persuasive Essay On National Parks

National parks should not be preserved and protected by the federal government because the government currently owns too much land

The policy 16 U.S.C§1; National Park Service was created in the Organic Act of 1916. This was a new agency whose mission was to “conserve the scenery and national and historic objects and the wildlife therein and to provide enjoyment of the same in such a manner and by such means as will leave them unimpaired for the enjoyment of the future generations.”

The park has been threatened by logging as well as non-native species. The NPS has gone to large lengths to keep this park protected, pushing for further legislation for protection to goto a federal authority. Making this a priority has had many payoffs and has been a big factor on the result that the park is in today. This park has suffered from budget cuts and actively tries to raise awareness and increase public interest. The NPS is partnering with other organizations to provide better service such as transit and educational opportunities to visitors. Making these promises has make their approval rating go up. The NPS also has one of the highest approval ratings of all government agencies.

It is not in the states that it is affecting. Many people argue that national parks are more important than private industries, but the private industries could do more good in the land on some of the unneeded national parks. There are many private organizations who run parks. Here is a link to one of them: http://parkprivatization.com/. This website shows who a private organization can do a better at running parks than the government because they have more motivation. It is great to get some fresh air, maybe camp and do outdoor activities, but it is not needed to have 25% of the country off-limits and owned by the government just for this small advantage. There are billions of dollars pumped into the national parks that could be given back to the taxpayer. Taxes could be lowered more than one percent, the EPA, if it was cut, could give back almost another full percent. This is more money to the taxpayers and less to the power hungry

National Parks have been a main attraction for some families as a bonding mechanism for many years. National Parks is a way parents get to inform their kids on nature and show them monuments in a very enjoyable way. However, National Parks are not getting enough funding they need to keep National Park Service (NPS) protecting it, so they are making funding cuts. National Parks are not being considered as a priority anymore. National Park Services help manage our park system and should be a priority in our nation because NPS protect our parks, heritage and culture, and resources.

Throughout history we have witnessed, heard and read about locations that had a significant impact in history. Stepping into historical locations can either bring back great memories or serve as memories of grief and sadness. Historical locations can be either war memoirs, monuments and it can be nature preserves. The National park systems is one of the achievements that the United States stands for, meaning the United States stands for glamor, refinement, protection and freedom. National parks are one of the most enjoyable sites to visit. The National Parks are under federal protection which states a powerful statement that Americans can demonstrate restraint to protect

In the American National Park System, there are 407 locations covering more than 84 million acres of land, they all have a passion for caring for the nation's nature and sharing their stories. One of the purposes of the National Park System is to honor the on-going serenity, union and compassion between nations.The National Park System has come a long way

In the words of the iconic Ron Swanson, from the hit show series Parks and Recreation, “the national parks service is probably the only branch of government worth a damn.” All thanks to the work of several individuals, backed by an entire government, this national treasure will soon celebrate its one hundredth birthday.

These sites are conserved to protect nature’s beauty and places of value to the people who are natives of the land. Today’s problem comes from the federal government proposing significant budget cuts to the NPS. If the government continues with this plan, Americans will lose the chance to experience untouched nature. Even though conserving these parks, monuments, and historical sites are not a priority in the government’s eyes, investing in the NPS should be a priority because the national monuments protect the meaning and value of the land and people are paying lots of money to keep the parks protected.

National parks signify the beauty and compassion of our national heritage through nature and wildlife. National Parks also deliver other invaluable economic, social, cultural and health benefits. With many people traveling yearly, there is always going to be someone new telling you to go to this way cool national park they visited during their vacation. The generations that follow us should know the importance of wanting to explore and appreciate nature around them and why there are parks dedicated and protected to them. Nature should be experienced through a kind and peaceful manner, so that everyone can enjoy. National parks have been woven into American society since the mid-1800s, and have been enjoyed and loved ever since.

Beginning in the late 1800’s, efforts to protect scenic and untouched land all across America were set in motion. From the 1800’s to mid 1900’s, many national parks were created under premises of preserving history and nature. During that period of time, Franklin Delano Roosevelt branched the National Parks Service (NPS) to manage all national parks. Now, in the current day, biological problems and resource scarcity persistently cause harm to the parks, and make it difficult for both the NPS and park management to regulate the parks. As such, current measures to ensure the longevity and well-being of the parks are not enough to keep up with the persisting financial and biological problems that the parks face. These problems entail disturbances in the ecosystem and pollution to environment, as well as a lack of resources to parks. However, each of these problems can be remedied, and possibly cured through the use of comprehensive models of action, and the participation of several parties.

This paper examines the pros and cons of the increased budget cuts to the national park system. There are major consequences for both the increase or maintaining of the income and, in contrast, the decrease of the federal budget to the preserved areas. National parks today are experiencing difficult instances with utilizing the environmental portion of the federal budget income in order to accommodate for the maintenance of the park. In addition, the sustainability of employment and ranger programs are at a fairly low rate, and the areas are unable to prolong the stay of those accommodations. However, it is costly to preserve the high-priced lands when visitation rates have greatly increased over the past decade. In result, the difficulty to

Everyone loves a great hike, or a great walk through a park. Having a place to go to in order to see the natural world is important to making sure ecosystems are not too terribly interrupted. Neighborhood parks, city parks, and national parks are lovely places to go and enjoy nature. National parks all over the world each serve a purpose: to preserve the world in its natural state without any outside force interferring. This may not always be the case. National parks, especially overseas, are changed, defunded, moved, or even vandalized all the time. People who live or come from areas with certain national parks create attachments, and hate to see their places crumble. Without these parks, the world would lose many of its

Parks.mapquest.com. (2016). America's 58 National Parks | MapQuest National Parks. [Online] Available at: http://parks.mapquest.com/national-parks/ [Accessed 17 Sep. 2016].Web

The Issue of National Park conservation has become a widely controversial issue today. With the National debt reaching 17 trillion dollars some politicians think it is alright to either sell off national park land to commercial foresters, miners, and even foreign nations or to just close some parks entirely to make up some of the national debt. They are completely unaware that the parks arent just a “pretty area of land for tourists”. Many cities depend on the parks for their well-being. A quote from a local newspaper in California supports this “National parks don’t boast concession stands or charge tax, but data indicates they bring in millions of dollars to local economies each year”(Tree). Supporters of cutting the parks include big CEO’s of major companies and some of them not even in this country.