Persuasive Essay On No Pass Law

This statistic proves how not many students are doing as good, considering the majority of them scored “below basics”. However, if we were to pass the policy then the score would most likely rise because students would be working harder in school and doing what they need to do. It could possibly give the student a better comprehension level and decision making level, so when they do begin driving the people around them along with themselves will be safer.

Not only do students lose opportunity in learning from these areas, but the law is also underfunded which the defeats the purpose as well as contradicting itself in the sense that students won’t be achieving the goals set by this law. By 2011, more than 50% of schools were labeled “failing”, and lawmakers saw the need for a change, but weren’t able to produce a bill. That year, the Obama administration offered states a reprieve from many of the law’s mandates through a series of

Though I understand the concept they were trying to create by suggesting these ideas, I do not agree with it, and I don’t think grades and driving correlate. “...granting the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles the permission and authority to revoke any student’s driver’s license due to poor grades or attendance.” I can better understand a parent making a rule that if their son/daughter does not maintain adequate grades, their driving privileges could be taken away. However, I don’t think it should be

Envision if everyone in the world decided to go around breaking laws because they did not agree with them. There would be a bunch of unnecessary arrests, great amount of violence, and the world would be a terrible place to live. As citizens of this country we have the commitment to adhere to the rules, laws, and submit to any consequences we may receive. In the great words of Socrates, “One should never do wrong in return, nor do any man harm, no matter what he may have done to you.” Breaking laws is never morally justifiable.

Because of safety concerns, many states have increased the age at which teens can begin to drive. The Virginia state legislature is considering raising the minimum driving age from 16 to 18. If the state raises the age to drive, kids would start depending on their parents to take them places. The parents would be chauffeuring their kids to places like school, work, and so on. I think raising the age to drive is a bad idea because the kids don't have to depend on the parents as much, it can teach the kids responsibility and freedom, and it can allow the kids to get jobs without their parents.

Many schools across the country have been implementing the “no pass/no drive” law for a few decades. Under this law, state officials have the power to confiscate student's driver's license if they have poor grades or too many absences. This law is thought to help decrease the state’s High school dropout rate. California should implement and enforce the “no pass no drive” law to all public high schools to decrease dropout rates.

Many people would probably say that if they saw an injured person, they would stop to help them. When put in the situation, however, would they actually stop? The United States of America does not require that pedestrians, who are not involved, help the ones who are. This is no excuse not to help, though. Even helping in just a small way could save a life.

One reason that the ‘No Pass/No Drive’ law is fair is because it encourages students to do well in school. For example in the article ‘No Pass/No Drive’: The Answer To High Drop-out Rates, adapted by Aryn Faur, “Clynt Goins, a senior at McMinn High, said that he got a warning from a school administrator that his driver’s licence would be taken away because of his poor attendance and grades. As a result, he started going to school more and took summer school to make up two classes he failed” (6). This supports my position by showing that this law is effective in other states and can help save students from dropping out and even inspiring some students to go to summer school!

In secondary school, kids have a couple of choices of getting the chance to class: having their guardians drive them, taking the transport, or driving themselves. The most simple alternative is for them to drive themselves to class. Being an authorized driver is a gigantic obligation and is expected to show youthful understudies how to handle obligation.

Most kids out in the country may have to drive to get to there school or social events mabe even their friends house. Another example could be that some people have a lot of siblings so parents have to run from place to place to picking up and dropping off their children. A solution to their problem may be allowing their teen to start using the driving privilege they will be able to help out parents and go places for them self without having to stress their parents by having them run from place to place

ESSA is an ideal law because of it’s flexibility on testing and it’s focus on every student’s access to education. The law will build on the hard work educators, communities, parents and students across the country have put to have a high standard education. Everyone want to see their school improve and student’s performance improve as well. Moreover, everyone wants to see high school graduation rates to go up, and high dropout to go low. Everyone wants to see more students goes to college as well. With ESSA, all this is possible.

Should we enforce a No Pass, No Drive law? I believe we should not enforce this law in the state of Wypoming.

In conclusion people should have a high school diploma before having a driver’s licence, for two reasons some people are too immature to be handling a driver's license, some people who do have a driver's licence but no car sometimes don’t really have enough education about how to drive cars, but for a counter claim ;however, Most people would learn at a younger and better age to drive than those who learn to old and have some difficulties

Kim Harrison say that “ Breaking rules isn't bad when what you're doing is more important than the rule itself.” In discussion of rebellion, one controversial issue has been showing that everyone's bewilderment. On the one hand, people argued that it is unsuitable to infringe the rules. On the other hand, people demonstrate that it is justified to contravene the rules. However, I believe that it is right to break the rules when it support a cause you believe in, unfairly and understandable.

     I understand getting a license is difficult, but in the end everything you go through is worth it. The driver will have more experience, more time to learn, and the driver will learn to drive with others as well as driving on your own. So I think that establishment of graduated licenseing is a good thing for teenagers and for society. When you take your