Persuasive Essay On Privacy

The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”. It consists of two clauses, the reasonableness clause which focuses on the reasonableness of a search and seizure and the warrant clause which limits the scope of a search. There are many views on how the Fourth Amendment should be interpreted, especially by today’s standards. The world has evolved significantly since the implementation of the Bill of Rights. As it evolved, time brought about numerous cases on the applicability of the Fourth Amendment. When plaintiffs are not satisfied with the decision of lower courts, they can

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution applies to a person and their home by providing protection against unreasonable seizures and searches. While it provides protection, not every search and seizure can be deemed unreasonable unless it is classified as per the law, by determining whether there was: a) the level of intrusion of the individuals Fourth Amendment, and b) whether or not it pertains to the government’s interest, such as safety of the public.

The Fourth Amendment was added on December 15, 1791, and ensured that it would protect citizens from arbitrary invasions, unlawful detainments, and a citizen’s right to privacy in the United States. Throughout modern America, the Fourth would should up in various landmark court cases around the country and establish itself as one of the most fundamental rights a person can possess. Citizens have the right to feel safe in their homes, as well as being safe around their own town, but what would happen if you were not at your residence and police wanted to search your home? This can be seen in the court case Weeks v. United States.

Because of the new technology boom, over the years the courts are being bombarded with request, for upholding or appealing, in what applies and does not apply, to the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is within the Bill of Rights in the United States Constitution. The Fourth Amendment, clearly states people have a right to be secure in their privacy, in their own persons, own homes, and their own papers and their personal effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, if there is probable cause of criminal or harmful intent being committed with a particular person or persons, than warrants can be issues with the written out plan of what is exactly going to be searched and exactly whom.

The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." The ultimate goal of this provision is to protect people’s right to privacy and freedom from arbitrary governmental intrusions. The Supreme Court has interpreted the Fourth Amendment to allow for a number of exceptions to this requirement where there are exigent circumstances.

The Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights was ratified on December 15, 1791. This Amendment protects people from the police searching their homes and private property without a properly executed search warrant. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized" ("Annenberg Classroom," 2006).

The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution comprises the Bill of Rights that fundamentally accentuates upon the prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures and presses upon the presence of warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by a probable cause. The law was basically developed in response to the abuse of the writ of assistance.

The Fourth Amendment Rights states that “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and

For my project I will be focusing on internet privacy laws and as to why they should not be weakened, instead strengthened. This day and age basically everyone has internet and cellphones that are used to actively track you. Consequently, companies such as Google use various algorithms that can detect if an advertisement you looked at online swayed your decision in buying the object, in store! Moreover, the FCC is also currently trying to weaken internet privacy laws greatly, and the vast majority of the public doesn’t seem to truly care. One common saying that is often thrown around is, “If you’ve got nothing to hide, then why hide it?” It’s not that simple, if the people were more informed on that matter, they would most likely care; but I’m not here to convince the people, I’m here to convince the current FCC chairperson why internet privacy matters.

Surveillance is, and has always been conducted by the government. The government gathers data through many apparatuses including, planes, GPS/satellites, video cameras, drones, microphones, police, the internet, and most importantly, through its surveillance programs. One big surveillance program the government runs is PRISM, “a system the NSA uses to gain access to the private communications of users of nine popular Internet services” (Lee). Surveillance programs can allow the government to abuse their powers or hide secret information, which is why these programs should be limited, as they pose a threat to one’s safety and privacy.

governments have always spied on their people, but after 9/11 (the terrorist attack that killed almost 3,000 people,) the United States took a new approach to conduct surveillance to insure public safety. Now the NSA can access a person's personal information like emails, calls, and messages without consent. This government action is a violation to people's privacy, it also is unconstitutional and contrivance the Fourth Amendment, plus the act of a person(s) spying on another is inhumane and can cause conflict between countries.

Privacy is a concern for many American and provides a sense of individuality to the people. Not many people want their whole life recorded and watched by some outside source. People want lives where they can be their own person and make their own decisions without being constantly under surveillance(Feeney). If the government were able to watch every little thing each citizen does in that person’s own life, the government would have almost infinite knowledge on any person at any given time. This might be useful to catch criminals, but in the end would result in a “big brother” government(Feeney), with no individuality, an almost Dystopian setting. Privacy from government surveillance, if not important to some, is still a constitutional right in which every United States citizen is allowed. If the Second Amendment was not respected, who is to say people need to respect the others? Government drone surveillance, in many cases, can result in a breach of a citizen’s reasonable right to privacy, and will only become worse as drone technology advances.

One's privacy is undoubtedly one of the most prized possessions. However, what if the privacy of the American citizens were suddenly

According to the US census bureau, about 87% of Americans freely use the internet. Luckily we can go to all the sites we want to go on because of net neutrality. Net neutrality is the idea that all content on the internet has equal treatment with equal speed to access everything on the internet. But, ISP (internet service providers) the FCC (Federal Communications Commission), and big phone companies are trying to enforce paid prioritization. Paid prioritization is the idea that companies should be able to pay ISP, or internet service providers, to have their content load faster than their competition’s content for consumers. Title ii of the Communications act guarantees us net neutrality but those rights are being challenged by ISP, the FCC, and the phone companies. I think we should keep the net neutrality laws so we can keep our freedom to access what we want on the internet.

On March 1, 1792, Thomas Jefferson announced that the 4th Amendment was adopted to the Constitution of the United States of America and that it formed part of the Bill of Rights. The Fourth Amendment was created to forbid unreasonable searches and seizures of individuals or their properties. This means that the government does not have the right to search or seize an individual’s house, papers or effects without a probable cause and an issued warrant. The fourth Amendment is meant to protect individuals from arbitrary arrest and is the basis of the law that involves search warrants, safety inspections, wiretaps, and other types of surveillance. It is also meant to be the central of many criminal law topics and privacy laws. The fourth Amendment is considered a civil