Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty

There are people in the world who have done things that are so severe and heartbreaking they cannot be forgiven. People that harass society and put fear in the minds of our citizens such as rapists, mass murderers, and terrorists deserve the punishment that they gave to the innocent victims. The United States is still a part of the minority of countries that still use the death penalty, also known as capital punishment. The death penalty should be used because it gives closure the victim’s family, acts as a deterrent for any other people wanting to attempt a crime of the same extent, and permanently prevents any further horrendous crime from that person.

The death penalty is cruel and unusual punishment because it is a vivid reminder of slavery, branding, and various corporal pains were common. It is an inhuman tradition that should not have any part in a civilized society. Nonetheless, only the United States in the whole western industrialized nations still holds the Capital punishment. The prosecutors who are 98% white choose randomly a sampling of convicted criminals would receive a sentence of death, where the prosecutor does not have to consider any constitutional laws or criteria. Simply, the discretions of the narrowly minded persecutors whose concerns might solely be their personal and political gains.

The death penalty is defined by the dictionary as the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. The death penalty has been seen as a way to punish those who have committed great crimes by death, whether from crucifixion or the electric chair. The death penalty has been around almost as long as humanity and was used even before laws were written down. The first written example came from King Hammurabi's laws such as an eye for an eye. A man who was convicted of murder and sentenced to this punishment decided to take the death penalty to court by describing it unconstitutional.

Up until recently, I felt that the Death Penalty is not necessary as a form of punishment. I felt that if an individual committed a horrendous enough crime to get the worst form of punishment available; the death penalty would be letting them off easy. I believed that having to spend the remainder of their lives in prison was the most extreme form of punishment for criminals. After speaking to a person close to me, I feel differently. As of now, I think that the death penalty results in retribution, closure for families, and is the most extreme, last resort, form of punishment, which we require in some cases. The death penalty is humane and cost-effective, and should not be going anywhere in the future.

How many people and their families have to suffer before the death penalty is abolished? Did you know that the death penalty not only sentences those who have committed unsightly murders to death but it discriminates? Or maybe you did not know about how much money it cost each and every time a human being is put to death. The government claims that the death penalty is to “rid the world of all evil”, yeah right! There has been cases where the people who was so called “evil”, was later found innocent. But guess what? It is too late because they have already been wrongfully accused and executed. I mean seriously, who are we to determine if someone gets to keep their life or not? Is that fair? Although some may believe that the death penalty is given only to those who deserve it, others argue that it is not the proper was to go about bringing someone to justice. People also that it is not always efficient, cruel and unusual punishment, and put innocent lives at risk.

The reason the death penalty should not be allowed is because it is just an easy way to get out of what the person has done. If that person does a crime they should do the time no matter what they did. No one should not be able to get an easier way out of what they have done by getting the death penalty. Jail time could be sentenced for the rest of his or her life based on the crime committed, and that way they can sit in the jail cell and really think about what they did instead of having a few minutes to live and think about it for just a second before it is over with. The crime committed should not be dismissed by a simple death penalty even if the family wants closure they should think about the fact that the person

What does Iran, China, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and the United States all have in common? All five countries lead the world in executions. In America the farthest line of justice is court sanctioned murder, more appropriately termed the death penalty. The death penalty should be abolished because of its outrageous expense, lack of purpose, racial prejudice, and toll on innocent lives. Since its reinstatement in 1997 the death penalty has been a horrible scheme and abuse of government power.

There are various topics of discussion that cause people discomfort, one of those topics is the death penalty. The vast majority of people can agree that justice should be served and there should be consequences for those who break the law. The question then becomes, where does one draw the line? All crimes are punishable through either jail/prison time, community service, or fines, however larger more severe crimes are punishable through the death penalty. Such crimes include, treason, airplane hijacking, and murder. The death penalty is meant to serve as a consequence to those who committed a major crime and a warning to other criminals. However, this form of punishment should be abolished.

Carlos Deluna was executed in Texas in 1989 and was sentenced to death on an eyewitness account proving to be a thin and an inaccurate statement displaying that the actual killer was a lookalike. Larry Griffin was executed in Missouri in 1995 with a trial that purely consisted of one witness whose sole testimony was undermined, leaving the first police officer on the scene to conclude that Griffin should not have been a suspect in the case at all let alone sentenced to death row. David Spence was executed in Texas in 1997 and was charged with the murders of three teenagers, he was put to death even though the police lieutenant who supervised Spence’s investigation did not believe him to be involved and claimed his innocence. (DP Info Center)

According to Deathpenaltyinfo.org, as of July 1st, 2017 there were approximately 2,817 prisoners on death row. CNN.com says that, as of now, the death penalty is only legal in 31 out of the 50 states. Did you know that the average death row inmate will spend roughly 15 years in prison before they meet their final day; nearly a quarter of death row inmates die of natural causes while waiting for execution, and exhausting all of their appeals? How about that in Virginia death row inmates are now able to play games, watch TV, send emails, and have physical contact with visitors along with much more? Death row is for criminals that have committed heinous crimes and have been convicted by 12 unanimous jurors to death. So, why give them that many privileges?

Leviticus 24:21 “The man who strikes and kills an animal should make compensation for it, but the one who strikes and kills a man should be put to death”. The death penalty has been around for a very long time and is not a new concept to our world. The usage of the death penalty dates back as far as the Babylonian era and was used for an assortment of crimes. This practice was also used greatly by the ancient Greeks and Romans, soon England began to practice this punishment and the founding fathers of our now great American colonies carried the capital punishment with them when they crossed over, where it is still used today as lawful punishment is a majority of states.

First and foremost, the death penalty is defined as the punishment of execution, administered to someone who has committed a terrible crime (Capital Punishment 1). This is also known as capital punishment, which is known for disregarding the human rights. Although many countries continue to enforce the death penalty, some countries think it should not be practiced. According to the United States, the death penalty continues to be a charged and controversial political and legal issue(Capital Punishment 1). In addition, the death penalty also focuses on if the death penalty is fair not unfair; let alone, if the criminal will receive the right justice and punishment for the crime he has brought onto himself. The death penalty is another option when rehabilitation and improvement are not available.

Cameron Todd Willingham was a husband and father of three infants. On December 23, 1991, Cameron woke up to his house in flames. As a result of the fire, the infants perished. When the police investigated the fire, they came to the conclusion that Cameron intentionally set the house on fire in hopes of murdering his daughters. Cameron pleaded not guilty but he was placed on death row and executed on February 17, 2004. After reopening the case and examining the evidence using modern technology, it became evident in 2011, that the fire was an accident. That's right: Cameron was innocent! The justice system failed Cameron Todd Willingham. This is one of the many reasons why the death penalty should be abolished across the United States.

Capital punishment remains a controversial issue in the United States. As of November 6th, 2016 there are 31 States that have the death penalty (States with and without the Death Penalty). People who are against the death penalty believe that it is cruel and unfair. The reason why is because killing someone is not going to bring the person killed back to life. People who are for the death penalty believe that if a person kills someone they deserve to be killed, so “an eye for an eye”. Since there are only 31 states that have the death penalty, two different people can commit the same crime in different states and one will get the death penalty and one won’t so it’s not really fair. For example a convict can commit a crime worthy of the death penalty in Nevada (where the death penalty is eligible), and another convict can commit the exact same crime in Iowa (where the death penalty is not eligible). One would be eligible for the death penalty, and one would not. The death penalty should be federal law, and all states should have the death penalty and effectively use it, under certain restrictions, and also to speed up the process of the death penalty.

The death penalty is when someone like a criminal would do something so terribly bad that they are executed by lethal injection. The topic of this has been disputed for a lot of years and nobody has really agreed on if it is or is not effective. Study’s show that the argument is split a lot of people think it is bad and a lot of people think it is a bad thing most people don’t want there tax dollars to go to keeping inmates in prison and feeding them. But some people think that it is just too hard of a punishment to kill somebody instead of keeping them in prison.