Persuasive Essay On The Death Penalty

Using the death penalty cost more than life in prison. Having to execute someone costs about 1.26 million dollars while life in prison costs 740,000 thousand dollars. 31 states out of 19 still use the death penalty. There is a noticeable difference between the states that use and those that do not use the death penalty like lower homicide rates and the effects it has on society. The death penalty is a tool that people say helps stop crime and makes the world a safer place but studies show that the death penalty has bad effects. The death penalty actually increases crime and has bad effects on society. There have been studies and statistics used to see how the death penalty affects people and if it is actually helping or increasing crime. There

Many people who are supporters of the death penalty say that it’s a successful deterrent. But this isn’t true because the death penalty is administered very inconsistently and arbitrarily. “Only a small proportion of first-degree murders is sentenced to death, and even fewer are executed” (Bedau). There are also several states that have a lower criminal rate without using capital punishment. For example Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan all get along just fine without the use of the death penalty. Also “…all other Western industrial countries get along quite well without killing their citizens” (Ryan). There are many judges that are against the use of capital punishment as well.

The death penalty, by definition, is the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime. Each state has their own determinates of why someone would be given the death penalty, for example, in Missouri, it is first degree murder, but for Alabama it is intentional murder with 18 aggravating factors.

The death penalty does not keep crime from happening. Over the years, the death penalty has been a very major moral issue within today’s society. This particular form of punishment is usually given to people who have been found guilty of capital crime. However, penalizing an individual in this manner is not a solution to the problem. The United States is already in a tremendous amount of debt and dealing with budget shortages, so spending thousands even hundreds of thousands on ending an individual’s life because they were found guilty of a crime is absolutely absurd. The death penalty costs taxpayers way more per year than a prisoner within the general population. It is a cruel punishment against mankind and therefore should be ceased. In conclusion, the death penalty should be discontinued in the United States because it uses up tax

There are 31 states with the Death Penalty and of those is California: which has the highest murder rate out of all 50 states. My point is the Death Penalty does not change the crime rate at all, in fact, states with the death penalty rule have more violence than those who don’t. In 2006, the FBI Uniform Crime Report revealed that the area of the U.S. that was responsible for the most executions (the South with 80 percent) also had the highest murder rate, whereas the Northern areas that had the fewest ­executions (less than one percent), had the lowest murder rates. Capital Punishment is useless and it wastes resources and time. It wastes the time of judges, jurors, prosecutors and police officers. According to a study conducted by the University of Florida, approximately 90 percent of the nation’s leading criminologist say that using capital punishment is an extreme waste of time and as well as

Since the beginning of time there has always been the question of what to do with someone that has committed a serious offense that has resulted in serious injury or even death to a person. The death penalty has always been a topic of whether it is humane or inhumane to put someone to death over their crimes against another human being. The death penalty to some is either acceptable to where a person should be put t death for their crimes or is not doing anything to deter people from committing crimes. the death penalty is starting to become less of a punishment and more of a costly expense to taxpayers whom for “Each death penalty case in Texas costs taxpayers about $2.3 million.” The death penalty for some think it should be abolished while others would rather see it extended.

Capital punishment is necessary in several occasions in the United States for various reasons it brings justice and safety. By doing this act around the United States it will prevent future crimes from happening anywhere no one will have to worry about that individual committing a terrible act. Look at Ted Bundy for example a serial killer that killed over thirty-six women around the United States but several individuals thought he killed more than one hundred women. He was executed in the electric chair in 1989 in Florida. Either way it will cost a lot to keep a prisoner for life in prison and cost a lot for a person in death row as well but cheaper. A person on the death penalty is cheaper than a person who is in prison for life without parole because even though it cost a lot for a person on death row, life in prison is a lot higher because of food, healthcare and other cost for maintaining a healthy individual. As more inmates start showing up the problem becomes bigger with money and space.

While criminals must be punished for their criminal actions, “legalized murder”, as author Coretta Scott King put it, is immoral. The death penalty is legalizing the very thing that many on death row are charged for, murder. There is a multitude of lawful alternatives, to the death penalty, of reestablishing a better reputation for the criminals. The Constitution has no true right to allow such a felonious form of rehabilitation.

The death penalty is lawful for capital murder. It eliminates life in prison, and it also saves tax dollars. It gives the victim’s family more closure along with the reduction of murder rates. The death penalty might seem cruel, but it is not very different from life in prison. Some crimes are so inherently wrong that they demand stricter punishments. We have the ability and power to punish people who deserve to be punished at the extent of how they should be punished. Of course, this penalty has its faults, but it does more good than bad.

Many people who are supporters of the death penalty say that it's a successful deterrent. But this isn't true because the death penalty is administered very inconsistently and arbitrarily. "Only a small proportion of first-degree murders is sentenced to death, and even fewer are executed" (Bedau). There are also several states that have a lower criminal rate without using capital punishment. For example Wisconsin, Iowa, and Michigan all get along just fine without the use of the death penalty. Also "…all other Western industrial countries get along quite well without killing their citizens" (Ryan). There are many judges that

Did you know that there are 2,902 people on the death penalty in the United States! With so many people on death row, it all comes at a high cost. A death row inmate waited an average of 15 years before execution in 2010. Many people are in the death penalty for awhile, which means the cost gets even higher. Not only is it expensive for the death penalty, but so many people are innocent and are still put to death. 144 people were put on death row and have been found not guilty, while 10 of them were put to death in the year 1973. There are many reasons why the death penalty is atrocious. But, two main reasons why the death penalty should be banned is because it is very costly, and many people have been innocent of what they have done.

Many questions arise from this punishment because there is no real justification. The death penalty should not be legal because it does not deter crime effectively as it should. There is no credible evidence that capital punishment deters crime. The death penalty advocates that it would deter crime but that is not the case. Studies have consistently failed to demonstrate that executions deter

Along with the Moral and Ethical problems the death penalty has monetary problems too. The cost of housing inmates on death row and the extra cost of appeals results in a total extra cost of 65 million dollars a year. All of that money is being wasted on a criminal who isn’t even worth the time to kill him. If you just put them in a federal prison it would cost a lot less. The death penalty per person is one of the most expensive state programs. Execution of one person costs about ten million dollars.

Although some may think that the death penalty is far too expensive and a waste of money, it is shown that through the years of being in jail/prison it actually adds up and is more expensive than a death penalty execution. What is the point in putting a criminal in jail/prison when taxpayers are paying their tax money to feed and support them, if they are going to live in a jail, the death penalty should be allowed to take care of them. If their crime is that terrible then why should people pay for them to live? Why should hard working people use their money to pay for them and

The death penalty is a form of punishment that is not used as often as one may think. Even though most of the American population is not personally affected by the death penalty, the friends and families of victims see it as a form of justice for their lost loved ones. From 1976 to the present there have been over 1,400 inmates executed after being put on death row (Baker, 1). The death penalty is an expensive style of punishment, costing around 470,000 dollars more in cases that consider capital punishment as an option compared to the cases that do not (Erb, 1). With most of that extra cost being paid by state taxes, there are other government funded programs that would experience a loss of support if the death penalty is used frequently. The U.S. National Government should ban the death penalty for economical reasons.