Persuasive Essay On The Internet

Most who argue against censorship believe that it goes against a person’s right to freedom of speech. Within this argument, most people wonder “just when, and on what grounds, the state is justified in using its coercive powers to limit the freedom of individuals” (West). When thinking in this mindset, individuals tend to antagonize the government, because they come to believe that it suppresses their individuality and fail to consider the fact that it unites people who share its similar beliefs. As a result of the recent spike in technology and use of the Internet, the public must continually alter its definition of freedom of speech and expression. As the media offers more and more methods of communication, many of which are relatively self-regulated by users, more methods of expression develop, which may render other forms of expression obsolete, or even socially unacceptable (Qazi). Without understanding how much freedom of speech one is entitled to, one may never hope to defend that freedom if it ever comes under attack. Because technology develops so quickly that one definition will hardly suffice for a short period of time, people will find it increasingly difficult to understand how much right to expression they are allowed and will therefore fight for any and all that they may attain, never considering the benefits of censorship in the slightest. In America especially, people idealize the idea of democracy, the investigation of truth, and independence (Fieser). In

Often times, I get yelled at for being on my Chromebook too much. When really, I have been doing homework the whole time. We have way too much homework and we need to have more paper homework. I will persuade everyone that we have an excessive amount of online homework. In my speech, I will tell you some of the problems with online homework, what we can do about it, and lastly, how others think of it.

Social media has been a topic of debate for years. Some people are strongly against any use of it while others like the instant connection it provides. A major concern over social media is the lasting effects it has on teenagers. Social media can affect teenagers through many ways including things like their self-esteem. Cyberbullying is a raging topic of discussion centered around teens social media use. It can also effect their people skills and create a lack of community involvement. Some parents think that watching what their children do on social media is an invasion of privacy but is your concern for their privacy greater than your concern for their safety? Social media poses a great danger to today’s children. It can affect many aspects of their lives.

Ever since I was little and did not know how to do basic things like walk, talk or solve an algebraic equation. Naturally I would get discouraged and would not try to do it again. However, my parents effortlessly raised me, had encourage me to keep going. That I would get what I wanted if I put my heart into it. I’m not spoiled like Simon sinek would say we were raised with bad parenting skills.; my parents did not argue with my teachers over a stupid grade or to force me intro honors class room.

This is ostensibly a problematic task given the role of personal biases in determining the parameters of censorship. Particularly since whistle-blowing revealed the mass surveillance programmes of the American and British governments, the belief in increasing gatekeepers for online content has been widely denounced by digital rights activists. For example, writing in The Guardian, Glenn Greenwald (2013), the close confidante of Edward Snowden, referred to calls for greater internet censorship as “far more menacing than - and at least just as hateful as - bigoted Twitter hashtags and online homophobic jokes”. Though perhaps overly hyperbolic, such an argument is understandable when considering that the horrors of Abu Ghraib would have likely gone unnoticed had it not been for the “digital world in which we live” making the circulation of images so easy (Sontag 2007 [2004]: 137). As this essay has consistently shown, without the free flow of information offered by the internet, our ability to hold authority figures and governments accountable is limited. After all, it is not merely a coincidence that censorship of the internet is typically high on the agenda of autocrats throughout the world (Agarwal, et al., 2010: 7). However, as the “pizzagate” incident demonstrates, we should not let an unwavering

In a world of ever evolving technology, it has become increasingly difficult for many leaders to censor and control the flow of information. The development of the Internet throughout the nineties has created a cosmopolitan world in which people from across the earth can communicate and share ideas and information. The development of Internet technology and social media web platforms have led to an increased desire for democracy in many areas of the world; however, some nations have worked to curtail the freedom of information flow by developing complex Internet censorship programs. While Internet censorship is a highly relevant topic in today’s society, it is mainly viewed as a problem in non-democratic countries. While at there is merit to this viewpoint, censorship is a much more universal obstacle than most people realize.

As Americans, we pride ourselves on having the ability to say what we want when we want to. This was a right given to us by the First Amendment of the Constitution. The act of censorship creates a barrier between media and freedom of speech. Due to the topic of censorship, many Americans have different opinions on if censorship is a violation of their rights as a citizen of the United States or if it is to preserve the wellbeing of the country. Before the internet became as powerful as it is today, the government reviewed every article, news report, and television show before being released for public viewing to prevent indecencies from occurring in the media. Consequently, as the media continues to flourish, it creates difficulties in the government being able to track everything that is online. Furthermore, the uprising of the internet creates more of a reason for censorship in the media, especially due to the increased use of the internet by children. Americans should include censorship in their everyday lives to a certain extent because of the violence in our country, to provide censorship for children, and to provide positive images.

In the Age of Information or the Era of the Internet, everyone is connected. Everyone carries around a computer in their pocket with more than enough computing power to send a man to the moon. Invisibly, data is constantly flowing. Virtually everything we interact with in today’s world has one thing in common: the internet. It plays a huge role in everything from sharing pictures with friends to the election. It is widely accessible and houses a wealth of information. Anyone should be able to access the network of data that is the internet. However, just as this Swiss Army Knife of innovation can be applied towards the common good, it can also be limited and used nefariously—an action that manifests itself in the form of censorship. Internet

"Internet Freedom, Human Rights and Power." Ebscohost.com. Australian Journal of International Affairs., Nov.-Dec. 2013. Web. 11 Nov. 2015.

Imagine an impressionable young kid discovering Reddit. He loves hockey, so he subscribes to /r/NHL to be up to date with all the possible hockey news. As little Tom continues to discover all that Reddit has to offer, he remembers a story one of his classmates told him; an urban legend that the old shack by the park is for storing dog brains. With Tom being curious about the myth, he goes on /r/conspiracy. However, instead of learning about the horrible dog-stealer legend, Tom now believes that Hillary Clinton is part of a pedophile ring located under a pizzeria in Washington D.C because of the radical and unethical claims that users on /r/conspiracy yell to Tom.

Australia is the first world nation by all standards. Australia also has passed the legislation to censoring the internet and blocking certain content. The authorities ask “ISP (internet service provider)” to censor the internet content and limit Australian to access internet. Although in Australian society, there are people who are in favour of internet censorship. The often question that “aren’t there things we don’t want to see on the internet?” Well, the answer is simply, “it might seem so, but censorship actually hurts everyone (including censors).”

In 2003 the Sudan government enacted a genocide against Darfur people that so far has resulted in 300,000 murders and two million displaced people. The genocide started because of decades of neglect and oppression in the west region of darfur in sudan causing two rebel groups to rise up against sudan's government. The sudanese president, Omar Al-Bashir countered the rebellion by using an allied militia called Janjaweed in a movement to destroy civilians of the same ethnicity as the rebels the darfur crisis was officially considered a genocide by former U.S. president George W. Bush, but even with worldwide efforts the genocide never ended. Recently the violence has spread to other parts of sudan with its presence on social media growing to. The effectiveness of social media campaigns for Save Darfur through twitter and facebook never lived up to its possible potential no matter how important its cause is.

Having escaped rule from a tyrannical British government, the United States was founded on ideals of freedom and equality for all people. These fantasies of universal egalitarianism turned out to be merely that: fantasies. American history is full of stories of the oppressed struggling to get the rights they deserve and of the controversy over these issues that consequently ensues. “The Hypocrisy of American Slavery” by Frederick Douglass and “We Shall Overcome” by Lyndon B. Johnson are two speeches made confronting two of these issues. Douglass’s speech, delivered in 1852, condemns the institution of slavery and maintains that slaves are men and are therefore entitled to freedom. Johnson’s speech, on the other hand, was written in 1965 and discussed the civil rights movement. In it, he implored local governments to allow all American citizens, regardless of race, to vote. Despite the significant gap in time between these two addresses, both speakers use similar persuasive techniques, including ethos, pathos, and parallelism, to convince their audience that change needs to be implemented in America.

Internet censorship is developing far and wide and influences us, regardless that as United States citizens, we have additional technological opportunities than what many other nations do. Numerous Americans underestimate the opportunities that living in the United States permits us. Whether we are sending electronic mail, posting on our social media pages, or seeking out the latest news, we are ensured the opportunity of self-expression and an inexhaustible amount of information right at our fingertips. Censorship takes control of people's expression, and many countries, governments, and leaders support it for this reason. Internet Censorship in the United States in comparison to different nations brings to light the global and ethical issue regarding the basic human rights of education, communication, and freedom.

Andrew Simoncelli once said, “Students who take online classes must be motivated, independent learners.” This is relevant because independence and motivation is what it takes to succeed in an online course. Online learning will not only expand what students learn, but will also bring a number of positive changes in the way students are taught. Courses online have changed everyone’s look at learning all over the world. It allows more opportunities for observers to learn online rather than learning in class. Another affirmative of taking an online course is flexibility and convenience. Students who would like to experience some of these ideas should look into an online class!