Welfare in the America is the government's attempt to help out the citizens that were and are struggling financially in life. They provide cash and other benefits to people who are deemed necessary of assistance. The idea behind the system is very good, it’s to help people get back on their feet so they can be a productive member of society. This includes finding work, providing for a family, and maybe even giving back to the community. The problem is that there are a lot of holes that are easily taken advantage of in the current system. It has gotten to the point where some people today even call it a broken system. There a few simple changes that I think could definitely make a big difference.
For starters, I think that it would be a good idea to occasionally drug test people that receive welfare benefits. Not that it is really any of our business to know about that, but I do think that is is unfair of people to apply for welfare and then spend all of that money on drugs and even alcohol. I would assume that there is probably a law protecting this from happening, but if you need welfare then you should put the money to good use. Spending the money on drugs is cheating the system, and is hurting our society much more than it is helping it. I think that is one big hole in the system that needs to be addressed in one way or another. Even if it not an easy fix, I think that is would be worth looking into a little deeper. I’m sure that this option has been evaluated at some
Imagine taking the money you rightfully earned through hard work and countless hours spent at work and throwing it all away, using it on items that are essentially a waste of your money and time. Suppose I told you that this very problem is present in our very own state, city, and county. Currently welfare recipients are given your tax paying money for their own pleasure, pleasure meaning drugs rather than resources and ways to improve their lives and their means of living. In efforts to help this issue we must begin testing individuals who receive welfare for drugs. Welfare recipients should be required to be drug tested because it could lower the crime rate, lowering the use of drugs overall, and create efficient government spending.
Welfare was created in 1935 by Franklin D. Roosevelt. It is the closest technique or practice of our country to socialism. It helped families during the Great Depression, but has been abused thoroughly within our country. Many citizens would like to do away with the system, but many resist this because it is their only income. Lots of skeptical citizens see it as the root of much of our country’s debt, but there is no easy way for it to be eliminated. Many steps have been taken to reduce the abusement and eventually do away with the system. This includes drug testing for welfare recipients. There are multiple issues with this idea and lots of people would like keep the system. Taxpayers that dislike what the government has come to, fear that
Plus, most people when looking for a job will have to pass a drug test in order to get the job. Welfare should be the same if not more strict because tax money is what pays for welfare. If we keep giving money to them and there are no drug test waiting for them down the road then they are just gonna keep doing what they did before to get in the situation and it will be easier because they are getting it for basically nothing. Testing them would ensure the taxpayers money isnt being wasted on someones drugs and that is actually helping someone the way it was intended. Some Senior citizens are even on welfare which is kind of suprising but it’s a a small percentage being 13% over 65 years
The United States welfare system should not support drug users because they are trying to get those people that need help, help. Therefore those people who are getting help from welfare should be bettering themselves and not hurting themselves. Drug testing should be mandatory, because this would be unfair to tax payers and other resources to support someone who abuses the benefit. Next, drug testing would benefit those who would need abuse treatment programs. Also, welfare should focus on families that would spend the money on necessities. Although welfare helps a lot of families, some use the money they receive to buy illegal drugs.
Welfare requirements should be stricter. To help eliminate the people on welfare who don’t actually need help, drug testing should be required for welfare recipients. 20% of people on welfare have used drugs in the past year and 5% admit to having a drug addiction. Drug testing will help in two ways. The first way is by getting addicts help and the second way is to help the government stop wasting money on people who don’t need it. Welfare should not be a lifelong dependency because America cannot afford spending money on people who don’t need help (Vitter 1). Drug testing would help the economy because it would help get drug abusers and low income families help. If we limit who gets what in society we will get better results. If you added certain requirements that had to be passed it would push people to contribute in society. In order to do this, people should be required to work while on welfare.
The topic of mandating regular drug testing for those on welfare is very controversial. It seems too one-sided to say that those who do drugs are the only people who should not be allowed welfare. There are many other ways that people might abuse their need of welfare money in illegal and unethical ways. Also, with the ever-increasing demand for welfare it seems more cost prohibitive to conduct regular drug testing on those who receive welfare. There is also the possibility of the drug test being compromised or destroyed due to human corruption. Instead, we should put more focus on the advancement and use of technology to monitor how welfare money is being used.
Welfare started as a temporary response to the economic crash in the 1930s. Its primary goal was to provide cushioning to the families who lost the ability to be self-sufficient during the Great Depression. Yet, as America slowly rose back to becoming prosperous and wealthy, a significant chunk of America's population stayed below in the transitioning social system. The welfare system started to become counterproductive to the government so that, in the 1990s, Clinton hastily came up with legislation to end welfare, more famously known as the Welfare Reform Act of 1996. This road that Clinton led ended in a downfall as more people than ever before are now dependent on the federal government for food, housing, and income. Our current welfare reform may need another reform before welfare can truly end.
portrayed as a wild success that has allowed families to “move from dependence on welfare to
As it stands now the welfare system is unfair to everyone to include, taxpayers who float the bill for futile programs; to society, whose
Today our welfare programs give out too much money and the systems need to be reformed again. In 1996 The Welfare Reform Act was enacted and it changed the entire program for the better. However, since then, the programs have become abused and need to be reformed again. Many of the people that receive state or federal funding have more luxury items than the average middle class family. The government should check-in on the families that are receiving assistance to make sure they actually need the assistance. The government should also place more stipulations on the various welfare programs in the state. There are several people all across the country that are abusing the system that was put in place to help get people survive in a time of
Can a single mother of three working full time for minimum wage afford to pay ' by herself ' for food, clothing, transportation, childcare, occupational training and medical care? Without government aid, the obvious answer is no. Temporary Aid to Needy Families (TANF), as described by Robert Kuttner, is a government aid program designed 'to help all of the working poor rise out of poverty.' It includes tuition reimbursements, wage supplements, and above all, childcare? (Kuttner). It creates a more equal opportunity for those at a disadvantage to improve themselves and their situation. TANF, 'which limits the time families can remain on welfare, appears to be a smashing success' (Cohn). First, if eligibility were to become stricter, seeking
I believe that people who receive welfare or any government funded program should be obligated to take drug test because if they continue to take drugs while receiving welfare then they are just taking advantage of the system. If the government enforce a law for mandatory drug testing to welfare recipient then possibly millions of tax payer’s money will go to those who don’t deserve as much as
With his constant pursuit for civil rights, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. helped bridge the gap between races during the 1960Õs. (It was) His unique approach of using nonviolent protests (to) helped create an awareness of the inequalities the African Americans had to endure during this time period. In 1963, King went to Birmingham, Alabama to engage in a nonviolent protest (there), yet before he could perform the (protest Ð use synonym such as rally or something) he was arrested. While King was in the prison he wrote Letter from a Birmingham Prison. By reading this letter one can easily see that aside from being ahehe civil rights crusader, King was also an incredibly
There are 109,631,000 Americans on welfare, and only 105,862,000 full time working Americans. The fact that the amount of people on welfare outnumbers those who work, shows how our country is deteriorating. Some individuals on welfare take advantage of the system and exchange the things given to them, such as food stamps, for drugs or alcohol. I think anyone who does that should be taken off of welfare. In order to prevent that from happening in the future, I believe a system should be made. The system would determine whether an individual is deserving of government assistance or not. In order to be on welfare, there would be a drug test that has to be passed to even be considered. If passed, there would be quarterly drug tests that have to be passed in order to continue to get help from the government. There should also be a standard set that determines if the severity of the person’s disability is worthy of governmental assistance. If they meet all the criteria and pass their quarterly drug tests, then they deserve to be on welfare. Those who do not meet the criteria and are qualified to work, should get a job in order to support themselves and their
The definition and viewing of poverty is a topic that many find highly debatable and close to the heart. Poverty is what most people see as not having enough to live on, and struggling to get anything more. Race and location are often looked at in conjunction to poverty. The author of the first article, McMillian, focuses on redefining poverty to a general audience by limiting her word choice and choosing a more personal appeal to the intended audience. In the other article, the authors Fram, Miller-Cribbs, and Van Horn write for an expert audience of social workers to frame the cause of achievement gap in U.S. southern schools by increasing their credibility through specialized language and resources. By examining the specialized language