Persuasive Essay: The GMO Labeling Debate

The yearning for power and an authoritative position in the society fueled the Salem Witch Trials and the Stanford Prison Experiment. The power allowed the people involved to exert control over others, forcing them to a lower level, and gave way to attention, fear, and respect, in some cases. In The Crucible, Abigail and the other girls use their hunger for power to control the people around them along with their desire to survive, including those who, at first, did not trust in the make-believe stories of the Devil’s presence in the town of Salem. The guards of the Stanford prison were power-hungry as well, as they relied on violence, instigation of fear, and the desire to be respected by the prisoners, to maintain their control inside the prison. At the start of the experiment, the guards were slightly more hesitant towards using harmful techniques.

Whether or not to require labeling of GM foods is a major issue in the persistent debate over the risks and benefits of foods crops that are produced using biotechnology. Bills requiring compulsory labeling have been introduced and proposed in different levels, but not evenly implemented. Some of the common genetically engineered crops include soya beans, canola, corn and cotton. The US Food and Drug Administration policy on the labeling of GM food requires labeling is the food has significantly distinct nutritional property (US FDA par 2). Further, labeling is required if the GM food product includes an allergen that consumers may not expect to find in such a product, or if the product contains a toxicant that is beyond acceptable limits (US FDA par 3).

Although the increased movement of people, food, and manufactured goods can have negative impacts on public health by providing a sort of highway for the spread of infectious disease, in contrast, it can also have a great positive impact. This movement can also include the increased ease of movement of people like doctors and engineers that can help to improve an otherwise cut-off region, the availability of fresh foods to areas that wouldn't normally have access during certain times of the year, and the increased east of movement of manufactures goods such as medicines. For this reason, the reduction of flow would most certainly have a much more negative affect on public health at this point in time. Instead, other options to control the negative affects must be explored. One such option would be the increased implementation of a better inspection and sterilization process for imported and even exported goods. In conjunction, a better global education system could be developed

The debate over genetically modified foods continues to haunt producers and consumers alike. Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are foods that have been modified through bioengineering to possess certain characteristics. These plants have been modified in the laboratory to enhance traits such as increased resistance to herbicides or increased nutritional content (Whitman, 2000). The debate continues to grow as to whether these genetically altered foodstuffs are the answer to hunger in the coming years, or whether we are simply children playing with something that we do not have the capacity to understand. One of the biggest debates in the GMO issue is whether producers need to use labeling of

Take away the juice boxes, burn the marshmallows, destroy all traces of GMOs. Right? All throughout the media and congress, there is a common notion that “All GMOs are bad!”. While parents are scared that they are feeding their children “Frankenfruit” and other “Frankenfoods, there is no research that has shown that GMOs are harming anyone. Because of the terribly expensive processes GMO’s must go through to become accepted by the American public, there are actually few GMOs that are making it into people food. If the scientists are lucky enough to successfully gene splice and create a GMO, there is a large possibility that they will be sued, publicly scrutinized, and shut down by the government and other activist

Do you find the labels on your favorite snacks to be helpful to most consumers? Many would answer this question yes, and argue that labels contain important information that all buyers should know for health or safety reasons. While this is true, this argument should not apply to GMO labeling. GMOs, of genetically modified organisms, are foods with altered genes from biotechnological techniques. They are used to help foods to be preserved, or prevent certain pests from eating or infecting them, or even to have other desired and beneficial traits. While many may disagree, including use of these GMOs on food labels is completely ineffective. They make GMOs appear to be foreign and dangerous. There are already organic foods for those who are suspicious of genetically altered foods that cause harm. These labels would also make buyers spend more money down the road. A bill to label GMOs would cause multiple issues for producers and buyers everywhere.

Genetically modified foods should be banned more than now because they are harmful for people’s health, farmers are damaged by mass production and can not help improvement of economy.

Ever since their entrance onto the consumer market in the last two decades of the twentieth century, genetically modified organisms (often referred to as GMOs) have been getting mixed reviews from the public. Genetically modified consumer products (primarily food) have pushed the barriers of some people's comfort levels. Born out of either a lack of knowledge or a sincere concern for public health or the environment, a consumer rights movement has been planted around the world pushing for labeling of genetically modified food products. This movement has matured in many places to a degree where interest groups have successfully lobbied governments into adopting criteria for labeling transgenic food

A GMO is an organism whose genetic makeup is changed by humans. A genetically modified organism (GMO) is a plant, animal or microorganism whose genetic code has been altered, subtracted, or added (either from the same species or a different species) in order to give it characteristics that it does not have normally.

Throughout Donald Trump’s presidential campaign, he has made sexist, racist, xenophobic, and hateful statements. Trump’s statements have resonated with many right-winged supporters and they have decided to act upon this rhetoric that expresses hatred and violence towards this group that they refer to as the “others.” Now that Trump is president, these alt-right groups, white nationalists, are using demonstrations, riots, and terrorism to promote hate and discriminatory ideals. These white nationalists, who once hide in plain sight, are now able to express themselves freely and gather in public settings. Oftentimes, these public gatherings end in violence and in the case of Charlottesville, even death. In this essay, I argue how the “Unite the Right” rally held in Charlottesville, succeeded in their social performance to draw attention to their identity and communicate to America, specifically those who they view as being politically correct, that they are being assertive and making sure that they are being heard. These white nationalists are showing America that they will do whatever to preserve American history and use the first amendment to say whatever they want to say so that they can invoke a response.

From a ‘preservative-free’ foot long ear of corn to an ‘all-natural’ refrigerator-sized cow, a lot of foods in our grocery stores are GMOs. GMOs are foods that humans have genetically altered to benefit consumers, but as this new technology is arising, more and more questions about whether it’s actually helpful have surfaced. GMOs should be labeled better because more and more people want to know what is in the food they’re buying, and because companies are deceiving the public with indirect labeling.

Have you ever wondered what you're really eating? Of course you have, who wouldn't? The label says that it's good and nothing wrong so you buy it. What could go wrong? Well, food scientists are putting these little things called GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) into your food. GMOs are plants or animals that are put into a process where there DNA is altered with DNA from other living organisms.

Have you ever devoured one of Minnesota's famous honeycrisp apples? Every single one of them is a clone, made with genetic engineering. Across the world, genetic engineering has been an ongoing controversial topic. People have different respectable perspectives on how their feel, but problems arise when newly accumulated scientific information is presented and not everyone is informed. New factual information and tests are being performed and presented daily, but expecting everyone to know about all of it would be absurd. Since this technology is still relatively new, some of the side effects are still unknown. But despite the potential risks, genetically modified organisms, or GMOs, are actually very advantageous to our world in a variety

only harm the environment, but humans as well. Many studies have shown that people get toxic

​Nowadays the majority of the foods that we eat contain genetically modified ingredients (GMO's). People who consume these foods think they are eating healthy but lack knowledge of what really is inside these foods. Consumers should have the right to know everything that's inside the food they're eating. Labeling Genetically Modified Foods is common sense, it should be presented to us just like we have calorie and cholesterol counters on the back of our food. Along with organic farmers, environmental groups, and other consumers, I believe that we should be aware of what foods that are Genetically Engineered by labeling them.