Persuasive Essay : What Should Banning The Burqas?

Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, said earlier this year that the full veil, such as the niqab or the burqa, "hurts the dignity of women and is not acceptable in French society" (Aljazeera). In opposition to the critics' argument, Alveena Malik, a former faith adviser to the last Labour government , believes, Britain needs to take a different direction from others in Europe and to accept the veil as part of a modern British way of life(Ross). She also believes that the religious practice of the Islamic face veil should be a fundamental right. By giving Muslims the fundamental right of practicing their religion, it would give them the right to express their freedom and religion. If Britain decided to deprive the Muslims of their fundamental right like France did, then Britain would be trying to force the Muslims that participate in wearing the Islamic face veil to conform to their society like France as well. The government says that the reason for the ban on the Islamic face veil is because of security and the values or beliefs of the country in which the Muslims reside in. For instance: France says that the ban may cause France to be a target of terrorism. If France is concerned about the security of the citizens and knows that banning the Islamic face veil would cause a potential problem of terrorism, it seems like France would

The anticipated law, whose purpose is to ban the use of the burqa and veil, finally took place in France. The ban started within school, and expanded into a restriction within the entire country. France drew international attention, questions, and opinions on the justification of this new law. Even though France’s main response to their justification of the ban is to preserve the French culture, the law also positively addresses other problems such as: religious freedom, public safety, and women’s rights.

Politicians in Quebec have passed a controversial religious neutrality bill which would require people receiving and giving services to expose their faces and could mean that the Muslim niqab or burqa could be banned in public.

Banning the burqa has become increasingly deliberate since 2011 in France. The burqa ban is also known as a ban that is against women wearing all face coverings while out in public places in France. On April 11, 2011 the ban of the burqa went into effect. There has, however, been much debate on this matter. Women think that the ban is discrimination to them, but on the other end, France believes that it will be a good thing for the country and the violence in the country. This ban was taken into court by an Islamic woman, who would only go by the name of S.A.S. This ban actually prevents the women from being abused and will help with the safety around the community. This ban was not meant to be discriminating or take any religious freedoms. Based off of evidence, France, the Defendant of the case has the right to ban the burqa from wear because of safety reasons.

The banning of the burqa has become an issue in many places, including France. The French Parliament has decided it is time to ban the burqa in public. They believe is a sign of the subjugation and submission of women to males. Some believe it is used to cover up abuse and they also believe it is unfair to the public that citizens cannot see the women’s faces. However it is unfair for these women to be banned from wearing what they choose as just everyone else does.The banning of the burqa should not be allowed because it is discriminatory towards Muslim women and violates their freedom of religion and their freedom to express themselves.

Women were forced to wear this dress to keep from committing impropriety but if men committed an act of impropriety nothing would be done about it like it would have been done with women. The claim was that the burka kept men from looking at a woman in an inappropriate way. Whereas, in reality it just kept women in the control of their male counterparts.

While many Muslims and certain human rights activist may oppose the ban on the burqa, many French citizens find it completely justified because of French

A nun can be covered from head to toe in order to devote herself to god. But when a Muslim woman does the same she is being oppressed. It may be argued that wearing a burqa benefits only a few and brings more harm than good to society. The real question is who does it harm? That should be the basis for banning this piece of clothing, not one based on fear or an arguably feeble argument that the women do not have a choice. To say that a ban on a specific item like this is undemocratic is an understatement. Following the French senate’s unanimous vote in favour of banning the burqa in late 2010, many European and western countries including Belgium and Spain have made the decision to take the

The Burkini Ban is currently taking place in France and is representing everything that is wrong with society today. The burkini was created as a modest swimwear in favor to those who have Islamic views and want to cover their bodies, while also providing them with comfort. The following articles cognizance the issue, "Why France Should Lift The Burkini Ban" by Lynn Yaeger, "France is right to ban the burkini" by Gavin Mortimer, as well as, "Three More Towns To Join Burkini Ban." The Burkini Ban is discriminating towards Muslim women, yet others are scared of Muslims, are not accepting multiculturalism, and are in favor of the ban. The ban is stripping away one's religious rights and caused a controversial outbreak.

In conclusion, it feels like that only Europeans who are awkward seeing Muslim women wearing burqa. While Sarkozy disagrees that wearing a burqa is a sign of oppression to women. I think it should be known that Muslim women choose to wear burqa not because of obligations. I believe Concerning the European human rights laws, I believe women who choose to wear the burqa should not be prevented from their choice.

Taking away people’s rights to wear certain clothing like a burqa is unconstitutional. This is protected under the 1st amendment. Under this amendment, freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly, and petition are protected. According to that amendment, this would be violating the part that allows the freedom of speech and religion. It applies because wearing a burqa is part of their religion. There was a case in

France should not have a ban on burkinis because that is taking away the freedom that every muslim woman should have. People of France should be coming together and stick up for these women even if they are not from the same religion. One day it could be you they targeting. And hopefully once something is said by the people then something will be done by the authority figures without police action being made. Because in today's day you never know what could happen if things are let go too far. Let muslim woman of France wear

When I was introduced to the topic of France’s ban on the veil, I disagreed with the law. I took a position based on my customs as an American citizen, which differs completely from those of France. International critics began to argue that France is violating what people call “Freedom of Religion,” which I agreed with at first. As a foreigner from America, I am accustomed to the American government’s definition of freedom of religion. Protected by the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise.” (Religious Freedom). You can express your religion in public, during church, mass, or religious meetings. So the presence of religious items such as the burqa's and veil do not disturb the people or government.

Currently, the French want to ban the wearing of religious symbols in public schools so that there is no social tension, and to keep the main religion in France (Roman Catholicism) ‘pure’ (Gofen 63). But even though the French say they want to keep their culture pure, in reality since the world wars, religions such as Islam and Judaism have in fact become a part of their culture. Once again, the French let in other cultures knowingly, and once the cultural diversity begins, all the religions are apart of a country’s culture. An example of a religious symbol that the French are considering to ban is the Burka. A Burka is an outfit worn by Muslim females that cover them head to toe. Some, who want to ban the burka say that it is disrespectful to women and can be degrading. But, 64 million people in France are Muslim. By wearing a Burka they are just following their religion and are also following tradition (French). One other big controversy regarding religious symbols is the banning of

Contrary to the popular argument that the banning of religious symbols, particularly the “hijab” will stop discrimination since everyone will be the same, it actually will deteriorate. discrimination is not caused by the differences, it is caused by ignorance. For instance, after banning the hijab in France and parts of Europe “hate speech affecting ethnic and religious minorities [… rose, along with] hate crimes targeting Muslims” (El Aabedy. "How does the EU hijab ruling affect Muslim women?”). This creates an unsafe environment for Muslims and their families because they are not allowed to continue their religious practices if they want to be treated equally and given more job opportunities. Although, feminism is strongly fought for in most places the fight should be for the rights of all women instead of only “women choosing to wear less, not for women choosing to wear more,” (Warda El-Kaddouri qtd. El Aabedy). The way that one chooses to dress should not determine their value as a human. In other cases the ruling allows “private businesses in Europe [to] forbid Muslim women [employees] from wearing headscarves if the ban is part of a policy of neutrality within the company and not a sign of prejudice against a particular religion,” (“High European Union court rules