Persuasive Essay : Why Education Should Be Free?

Should schools provide free lunches is the question being asked quite frequently. Over 60 percent of students eat Hot lunch, 30 percent of students´ eat a cold lunch and 10 percent of students don't even eat any kind of lunch at all. For the student that do eat hot lunch 80 percent of student are accepted for a deducted priced lunch and over 70 percent of students are eligible for free lunches. With this kind of information we know it's not a huge deal ,but it is definitely something to keep in mind. In spite of the fact that most Kids that do eat hot lunches at school their parents pay for their lunches. In the following statements I will explain why It would be easier for the taxpayers to pay for school lunches and why Students need free

It becomes a major controversy when the idea of something being “free” is brought up in this economy. Money is what operates the economical system and it’s the factor that leads colleges in providing resources for their students. President Obama’s idea of having community college be free leaves many skeptical on whether it can be beneficial, or in some ways hurtful. However, there are upsides to allowing community college to be free. Community College should be free because it will cause a diversity of students to attend, allow students to save money, and offer an opportunity for those who aspire to continue their education.

There is no excuse to dropout of college. It is so easy to do, and

Introduction: According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, “Only sixty-five percent of students graduating from High School will attend College.” That means six out of every ten of the students you went to high school with will continue their education to pursue a career. How many people in this class are currently paying for college themselves? Is anyone not sure how they are going to afford their classes next semester? Wouldn’t life be much more easier and make college a lot more appealing if it was free.

This year there has been plenty of commotion with regards to lower tuition. At the start of the year President Barack Obama proposed a bill that would make the first two years of community college free. However, it has a high risk of dying in congress since it would cost too much to fund it. Also, running presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, unveiled a bill that would make four year colleges tuition free. It may sound nice, but it requires several cuts and it will cost much more to fund than President Obama’s bill. The plan that I will be proposing was originally thought of by Jay Rosenstein, a student from the University of Illinois. The plan that I am proposing will be based of the plan from Rosentein. University Presidents should consider the Lower Tuition Now Project because it could potentially be the gateway

Free education is not an issue that just affects today’s society, it is a problem that has transcended American history. Founding Father, John Adams stated, “The whole people must take upon themselves the education of the whole people, and must be willing to bear the expense of it.” Every year many high school graduates find themselves asking themselves, “What next?” For most, the logical answer is to continue their education. That is, if they can afford it. For those more financially-needy students, financial aid is a huge for paying for college; scholarships assist every student, but scholarship money is limited, and even if you do sometimes you just simply do not receive enough. The need for free college tuition is there and there are many ways for it to be carried out. The lack of funds for college can be very disheartening for hopeful college students, and as Carol Christ, Director of Center for Studies in Higher Education, stated, “Education, in today’s world, is the path to the American dream.” This discouragement can be detrimental to a student’s drive for success. Which in turn causes the nation, and the states, to fall behind. Free college tuition would be beneficial to both the student and, although at a gradual pace, society around the student.

Every year the rate of college drop outs rise. Not because of bad grades or not personal life. It is because of school costing too much and students needing to get full time job to even make some type of payments, so the college won’t drop you from classes. The lack of funding

According to Jenna Johnson, a Washington Post Staff writer, she writes in a article on student dropouts, “58 percent said they did not receive any financial help from their parents or relatives to pay tuition or fees, and 69 percent had no scholarships or financial aid. When these students decided to drop out, 70 percent said they did so because they needed to work to support themselves; other reasons included not being able to afford tuition and fees, needing a break, classes that were not useful and needing more time to spend with family.”

College should be free, because low income families have college ready kids. Still the kids don’t go to college, there must be something stopping these kids. The percent of people who are 25 and over that had some college is only 58.57%. These numbers decrease as the amount of college increases, this fact is very disappointing. 62% percent of people said they didn’t go to college because they thought that it was ridiculous to even think about the cost. This is so sad, to think that the people are scared to further their education because of the lifetime

Currently, there is a debate going on between many when it comes to answering the question: should college be free or should students pay for it themselves. Many authors seem to think that free college is a nuisance to taxpayers and those that are actually funding it, while on the other hand some authors believe that it is a great thing for our nation. In “Obama’s “Free” Community College Scheme,” Michael LaFerrara argues that Obama’s plan for free education is “immoral and destructive” (LaFerrara line 4) because he is funding this program with taxpayers’ money that could be used differently if those taxpayers could keep their earnings. In Celeste Carruthers article “Tennessee Is Showing How Free Tuition Community College Works” and she is attempting to persuade her audience that the Tennessee Promise is effective because it convinces more students to attend college because of the lack of payment, and if they can be this successful in Tennessee, so can other states if they establish a similar program. There is also Michael J. Petrilli and his work titled “Free Tuition Is a Needless Windfall for Affluent Voters and State Institutions,” where he suggests that politicians should be working to improve schools to make sure that students are more prepared to go to college, rather than providing them with free community college. Meanwhile, there are authors like Deborah Santiago and her article “Free Tuition Can Boost Latinos College Access and Completion Rates” and Bernie

In the world, we live in has many problems that need to be resolved but one that hits close to many students is free education. College isn't cheap and for those who have families who fall in the “middle class” or below it may be impossible to attend college. Families wonder how they’re going to be able to afford college for their kids. Many families save for years to be able to provide their kids with the best education but what about those who aren't able to save? Although there are federal programs that will assist with paying for college but in a lot of cases that just isn't enough. I feel offering free education will help with the raise in college admissions which then affects our economy.

We are always told that social programs such as free college, social security, and rent control are put in place to “help” those that are unable to assist themselves. There are many people that believe free college is the answer to high college debt, just ask Bernie Sanders and Gov. Cuomo. But what these people do not understand is the affect “free college” will have on the forgotten man. But who is the forgotten man? This is how William Sumner, a Yale professor, describes it:

The words “free college tuition” spark interest in any college student with accumulating debt. In fact, this topic is so incredibly supported that Bernie Sanders implemented it as a core interest in his 2016 campaign. Once Hillary Clinton became the Democratic nominee, she decided to take it on herself with an extensive plan that guaranteed students free tuition. Unsurprisingly, free tuition resonates extremely well within the student demographic. To forty million Americans, free tuition eliminates the largest problem for students: debt (Hess, 2017). However, free college tuition generates the inverse of what these low-income and middle-income students believe. In fact, free college cripples them from multiple perspectives; students will end up spending more financially, will be less likely to graduate with a degree, and will be subjected to more inequality and less exposure.

Education is an essential mechanism for gaining knowledge and learning new skills. We begin the process at home, then we carry our journey into the different level of schooling and finally into the real world. Education guilds us to make decisive and better choices for our lives. Also, it supplements a humans understanding and intelligence of leading a strong and prosperous life. But, is it necessary to get educated only at school? The answer is no, however, the education we receive at school, gets us prepared to compete and challenge this world.

Students drop out of colleges because of financial issues. Although some students get financial aid, it is not enough to pay for the expenses attached to getting a college degree. Students need money to buy textbooks which are highly expensive. Most courses required assignments to be taken online in which students must purchase a pass code. They also need money to pay their bills, take transportation to schools, and buy other items for personal needs. Due to financial constraint, most students have to work in addition to attending school. Students get