Persuasive Speech On Animals

In this paper there are three main topics that are going to be covered. They are alternatives to animal testing, animal testing in cosmetics, and the news in the cosmetic industry related to animal testing. For this paper there were four sources that were evaluated. All of them had a few things in common and through that it was easy to link them together through three different subtopics that will be evaluated later in this paper. The first source that I will be using is “The Science of Dermocosmetics and Its Role in Dermatology”. This article was written by Dreno, B., E. Araviiskaia, E. Berardesca, T. Bieber, J. Hawk, M. Sanchez- Viera, and P. Wolkenstein. The second article that will be effective in this essay is “New

According to the all-creatures.org poem “Exist” by Tammy C Smith, medicine intended for human use shouldn’t be tested on animals because animals don’t deserve to endure the agonies of testing. The poem explains the desire for a world in which all creatures can be treated equal. It explains how the earth needs to be the place where all these animal cruelties end, where humans and animals are equal. This can be related to why animal experimentation needs to end because it shows how humans need to show more compassion for other animals since they are also living beings. And the poem says that in the world all creatures should “Shares this earth in peace and love/with no torture to begin.” (Smith Line 11-12)which can explain that all animals deserve

If animal testing is the best method for testing products, humans would be a good method as well. These drugs, whether they are cosmetic, house supplies, or food additives, are initially made for the human species. If none of the animals tested are going to have these products for personal use, they should not have to suffer for them. An alternative method of experimentation has been recently studied, this study showed that human tissue and human cells can be tested on rather than animals. "Human tissue- and cell-based research methods, cadavers, sophisticated high-fidelity human patient simulators and computational models are more reliable, more precise, less expensive, and more humane than animal experiments" (Animal Rights). Not only can

For decades, the question of ethics in using humans and animals for research has been a constant battle in the fields of science, medicine, and even cosmetics. According to the Animal Welfare Association, approximately 19,500,000 animals - including mice, dogs, cats, guinea pigs, and frogs - are killed yearly on average due to research. Although more than 50% of adults in the United States are opposed to animal testing, many popular companies like Maybelline, Vaseline, Dove, and Windex choose to remain in the shadow of animal cruelty and use animals as expendable lab equipment.

“Animal testing is needless, especially in cosmetics” (Leona Lewis). Animals are being mistreated because of U.S labs. Furthermore, animals are dying in experimenting labs from the cruel and hard conditions. Although, animals often make better research subjects than human beings because of their shorter life cycles, animals should not be tested in experiments, because animal testing is cruel and inhumane, animals used in experiments are are commonly using force feeding, force inhalation, food and water deprivation, and many others.

On the day I was born, my mother was taken away from me. My brother was tortured with boiling water and my sister was exiled to a lab, to be experimented on. At this moment my life becomes an assembly line of torment, bloodshed, and isolation from the real world. Being feed antibiotics, while living in my own feces just to await the sweet release of death. This is the life of many animals who are involuntarily born into a world of sadistic humans. For years we have been torturing animals for noncumplusory reasons. We beat, skin, and kill animals for the sake of making moeny, but dont step back and think about the damge causing our animals, and our environment. The death of animals should not be required for food, fashion, nor experimental needs. Animal cruelty is redundant, gratuitos, and plain nonsensical. Animal cruelty needs to be stopped.

Another element on why experimentation on animals is wrong is because, in multiple ways, it is pointless. According to an online article titled "Animal Testing”, the main stated reason that major companies even test their products on animals is because they are supposedly watching out for the safety of human beings. Most toxic products are tested on many types of different animals. Some toxic products that are used are: soaps, detergents, oven cleaners, and toilet cleaners. What is the problem with this picture? No amount of rigorous animal testing could possibly change the fact that many of these products are harmful if ingested or used in a way not intended by the manufacturer. In other words, there is no reason to force animals to swallow any toxic products, when no matter what, they would harm any person if they choose to digest it. Another point, many different types of drugs are actually very useful to

According to Humane Society International article, The National Research Council in the United States has expressed a vision of “a not-so distant future in which virtually all routine toxicity testing would be conducted in human cells or cell lines”, and science leaders around the world have echoed this view”. Though this method has not yet been fully completed, there are methods such as in vitro tests that are taking place over animal testing. Stated in the Humane Society International article, the sequencing of the human genome and birth of functional genomics, the explosive growth of computer power and computational biology, and high-speed robot automation of cell-based (in vitro) screening systems has sparked a quiet revolution in biology (“About”). Stated in the article, Alternatives to Animal Testing, PETA describes some of the alternatives to animal testing, one of these being in vitro testing. In vitro are chips that contain human cells that have grown in a state-of-the-art system so that they mimic the structure and function of human organs and organ systems. These chips allow researchers to conduct disease research, drug testing, and toxicity testing without using a single animal. The chips have been shown to replicate human physiology, diseases, and drug responses more accurately than the crude animal experiments. There is also computer modeling that can take place over the use of animals. This computer modeling consists of a wide range of sophisticated computer models that stimulate human biology and the progression of developing diseases. Studies show that these models are accurately predicting the ways that new drugs will react in the human body (“Alternatives”). Though all of these new methods are highly practical and have already shown an improvement in predicting the outcomes of products,

Throughout history, animal testing has played a monumental role in leading to new discoveries and human benefits. However, what many people tend to forget are the millions of animals that are tortured and killed during these painful, deadly experiments. Imagine being a family pet, but instead of living in a warm home with a caring family, living locked up in a small metal cage, only being let out to swallow harmful chemicals, to be poked and prodded with needles, and to be injected with chemicals. And after the animal’s use for testing is over, they are either killed or die because of their injuries. This is an impractical, unsafe way to find out the safety of everyday products. Animal testing is an impractical, inhumane method of cosmetic testing not worth the resulting multitude of animal deaths when humans could easily be substituted as the test subject.

Lastly, there are many other methods to find the way products will react with humans.We have developed in-vitro testing, artificial skin, and computer simulations to help us see the effects that products will have on specific human parts. In-vitro tests are human cell tissue based; they are very accurate. Artificial skin, such as EpiDerm and SkinEthic, can measure irritability of the skin, along with a product’s ability to damage the skin. These and similar computer simulated technologies are accurate “between 90 and 95 percent”, much higher than animal tests. Therefore, tests like these are much safer, and have more of a guarantee to

They run the tests on the cells in the dish. In this process, no animals or humans were harmed (Rogers).” By using this method, scientists can receive more accurate results. People could also volunteer or use computer molecules. Another study by Doctor Elias Zerhouni, the former director of U.S. National Institutes of Health director, says there is a new study using “organ-on-chips”. The organ-on-chips are human body cells. Since they are human cells, they can mimic parts of the human body. They are able to mimic the function and structure of the human organs and organ systems. This test is called In-Vitro testing. This type of test can be used for many things.For example, the scientist use this is drug test in drug testing, diese research, and toxicity testing. The results of these

First and foremnost, I believe it is morally unacceptable to torture and kill one species for the good on another. In particular, experimenting on animals and exposing them to harmful chemicals is simply barbaric. Animals are living creatures and they feel pain just as intensely as human beings. Therefore, we have no right to inflict this kind of torture on them.

The possibility of eliminating animal testing of cosmetic products is completely easy in this modern world. The research has done in the past three decades have developed many advanced alternatives to stop the use of animal for the safety purpose. These methods are the use of human blood, cell lines, artificial skin and computer models. Many multinational companies are using these alternative test methods and have ensured human protection and safety. These alternative methods have totally eliminated the dependence on animal testing (Moran & Locke, 2014).

Just imagine if it was you who is locked in that cage waiting to be tortured and killed, imagine the agony, the suffer, the pain. Animals feel the same way you would feel or even worst because they are innocent and they cannot speak for themselves. Animals are not things to be used for experiments. Animals should be free in their natural habitat. If it’s inhumane for humans, then why do we allow it on animals? There is no difference between a child and a dog, a man and a rat. We all feel love, we all feel pain and we all deserve freedom. We must do something about it, we must cooperate somehow to end the millions of torturing of animals in laboratories “Never, never be afraid to do what’s right, especially if the wellbeing of a person or animal is at stake” (Martin Luther King Jr.) The well being of humans cannot justify the torturing, exploiting of thousands of animals per year to perform laboratory experiments or to test products. Animals must be treated with respect, love and compassion and the practices in laboratories do not uphold the right of these animals all for the cost of vanity and the cost of selfish human gain. We must do stand up and speak for them. We are their

Animals have been the guinea pigs for many years for cosmetic brands to test if their products are safe enough to sell to humans, and it is time to put a stop to this. An article from the website faunalytics.org “Research animal fundamentals” states that in the United States alone there are 271,284 hamsters and guinea pigs, 138, 348 rabbits, and over 20 million rats and mice bred just for cosmetic testing alone in the United States. These brands take their product and apply it to an animal to see what the