By now I think I've made it quite apparent that one of my biggest pet peeves is miscommunication. I pride myself on being a first-rate communicator. I may not be perfect at it, but I try really, really, REALLY hard to choose my words carefully - both in speaking and in writing. So, when something I've said or written gets misconstrued, it makes me CRAZY! To make matters worse, sometimes the more I try to explain myself, the more confusing the situation seems to become because people, in general, do not always know how to LISTEN. I include myself in that category. Being a good listener is definitely a skill one must continually practice. When these situations happen, it makes me want to run off to some secluded place, never again having
Most people think they have good listening skills, but this rational is far from the truth. Why? Because according to Petersen (2007), “We must understand ourselves, how we think and feel, to fully engage in effective communication” (p. 65). However, often we do not understand ourselves and as a result, we tend to get ourselves in misunderstandings and even painful circumstances in life for lack of good listening skills. Dr. Petersen provides a clear guide to improving the interaction we have with others and also provided an answer to the question inscribed in the book title.
The second communication misconception is the more communication the clearer the message is transmitted. It is a well know fact that too little communication can be disastrous, but few are aware that too much communication can be just as deadly. Talking too much can both be unproductive by wasting time, and can exasperate a problem. For example, when my friend and I went to Spain on a school trip and we were trying to pay for our coffee in Spanish, the waiter misunderstood what we were trying to say and thought that we wanted two more coffees. No matter how much we tried to clearly communicate in both Spanish and English we could not solve our problem. After the 5th time we tried to communicate the waiter got frustrated, and we ended up drinking the two extra
Watch the person as they talk. After speaking, allow them plenty of time to respond. If they feel rushed or pressured to speak, they may become anxious, which can affect their ability to communicate. Avoid finishing their sentences or correcting any errors in their language as this may cause resentment and frustration. Ask what the person prefers. If you do not understand what they are trying to communicate, do not pretend you understand. They may find this patronising and upsetting. It's always best to be honest about your lack of understanding. You could ask for clarification by asking yes/no questions or paraphrasing.
I acknowledge that my communication is something that can always be improved upon and I continuously seek feed back and constructive criticism in order to improve how I interact with others.
It’s obvious that miscommunication causes problems. Language is a universal form of communication. It’s the way people get their ideas, emotions, and thoughts across to the world, and people.
This case involves suspect George Luna being arrested for public intoxication. Luna had defecated/urinated, was unable to stand on his own without assistance, a slurred speech, watery eyes, an a strong odor of an alcoholic beverage emitting from his person. Luna was arrested and transported to HMH, where he was cited for PC 647(f) - Public Intoxication, citation #C462884 with a court date of 03/01/18. Luna was later released from HMH once he was medically cleared.
I’m a person, who is very straight forward, and I’m serious at all times, even at play. I will ask probing questions over and over to make sure I heard what was being conveyed to me correctly before I would give my answer. I do this in order to get the full understanding, because it is very easy to misunderstand what a person is saying. I’ve not always done these steps, so I have had a few bad experiences from misreading a message or statement. My perception is not always the best, or accurate, I’m working on that in all areas of my life.
Interpersonal communication involves the relationship between two people and how they communicate with one another. There are many different types of relationships that people have with others. Each different type of relationship requires different types of communication. Not every relationship is the same and the way people communicate with one another is a very important aspect of how the relationship works. Interpersonal communication is impacted by emotions and at times these emotions can cause obstacles within relationships. Another important aspect of a relationship is one’s cultural beliefs.
Communication for me of the verbal kind has never been a challenge, I love meeting new people, and I love talking with new people, I am a people person to say the least. My personality under pressure supersedes any negativity that is happening around me, I don’t believe that negative things should overcome the positive, and I see every situation in life as one with positivity. I am an excellent verbal communicator, especially in the work place. I must be, because I am a particular person when it comes to most things in life, not to say I am stubborn, unwilling or unable
What point is MacAulay trying to make when it comes to the belief that sexual assault occurs due to miscommunication?
Each individual is like a rain drop on the window; none of them are any more significant than another. There are the occasional droplets which are larger than the rest, the ones with a greater influence than the others. As time goes by, a droplet eventually collides with another, and another, and another...until they form a huge puddle and eventually roll away. The result is a chain reaction: the larger rain drops influence others, serving as catalysts in society. However, droplets alone, are fragile and vulnerable. In Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis and Albert Camus' The Stranger, the significant role of communication is portrayed through two extreme examples. Miscommunication causes serious consequences leading to alienation and
Some of the recent literature surrounding public perceptions of wrongful convictions, focuses on how frequently wrongful convictions occur and whether the public know of this and consider it to be an issue that needs to be rectified (Zalman 2005; Bell & Clow 2007) Most of this literature seems to suggest that although the general public can identify many of the reasons behind wrongful conviction [eye witness testimonies, false confessions etc.], and estimate that 6-10% of all convictions are wrong (Zalman 2005) still are of the opinion that wrongful convictions are not an issue that needs to be considered by justice system (Zalman 2005). In contrast, another study conducted by Bell & Clow 2007 found that 82% of those surveyed believed that wrongful conviction was an issue. The difference in the findings may be explained by the difference in culture between the US and Canada, and the difference in methodology used (Clow & Ricciardelli 2014).
“What, what did you say?” I often find myself saying this when talking with children. The likely culprit of why is poor listening habits. “Most people spend mere time listening than they spend on any other communication activity, yet a large percentage of people never learn to listen well.” (TLSC, 2008) The above example is what I like to call “pseudo listening.” People will be thinking about something else but appear to be listening and only get about half the intended message. Recently at my father’s (Ron) company because of a pseudo listening instance a $400,000 dollar piece of equipment did not get specked correctly. When it was delivered to the customer at Company B the blast doors did not fit properly on the dryer unit. As one
To function effectively in today’s society people must communicate with one another. Yet for some individuals communication experiences are so unrewarding that they either consciously or unconsciously avoid situations where communication is required. (McCroskey & Richmond, 1979) The term ‘communication apprehension’ was coined by James McCroskey (1976a) and is defined as “an individual’s level of fear or anxiety associated with either real or anticipated communication with another person or persons” (McCroskey, 1984). In the last two decades communication apprehension and related constructs, such as reticence and unwillingness to communicate, have received extensive research and theoretical attention by scholars in communication and
Remember, it is very easy to see other people's mistakes, but not as easy when taking a look at yourself, it is much harder to accept criticism, even from yourself- because no one wants to be wrong. This is where we need to get real about things. Communication is not about who is right or wrong, but instead about helping each other see things from each other's perspective, so that you can be on the page and avoid any misunderstanding that will cause unneeded arguments. Communication is not so complicated, once there is understanding in addition to understanding what the right way communicating is and what methods of communication works for you and your communication best. Effective communication cannot happen on its own or with the efforts of only one person.