A Critique of Peter Cappelli’s “Why Focusing Too Narrowly in College Could Backfire” In Peter Cappelli’s “Why Focusing Too Narrowly in College Could Backfire” He wants to focus on getting a job after college graduation, and how parents can help to guide their children. This article focuses on perspective college students and their parents warning them on the dangers of college. This is a well-organized and very authenticity article but lacks enough hard evidence to make a valid argument.
Peter Cappelli has compared college to a crapshoot and that to succeed you have to make a good business decision. Cappelli says when picking a college parents need to ask “Does the Product Get Out the Door?” meaning what chance does their kid have of getting
…show more content…
But warns of the dangers of specialization saying that they can sometimes help in the job search but they can vastly limit your opportunities in the job market. And believes that the best track is to find a diverse university where you can take multiple years of classes, to find your skills and see what’s hot in the job market before picking a major. The article is written in such a way that it persuades the audiences attention to the information he is providing them. As the organization of each paragraph builds on each other with provocative information as the name of the article garbs your attention with a warning that college could backfire. It continues to build on that warning, asking the question “Does the Product Get Out the Door” the “Product” that Cappelli is talking about is the student, and the meaning of “Get out the Door” is getting a job out of college. In this paragraph he dives into college placement rates, and the costly price of college education. In the next paragraph “Today’s Jobs Aren’t Necessarily Tomorrow’s” as he continually builds on that warning of college backfiring stating that the jobs that are in demand, in today’s society
Accordingly, Marty Nemko, in his article, establishes college to be a deceiving business that is suitable only to a selective, precise percentile of high school graduates. In addition, Nemko states throughout the self-explanatory article that deciding to proceed to college will not necessarily guarantee a successful, effective outcome for students. Moreover, he covers most areas that involve, or revolve around, college. For instance, education, unemployment, debt and jobs subsequent to college are some of the risks that one must ponder and determine if college is worth it in the end. Furthermore, Nemko discloses the actuality of college and how it is unfavorable for most people. However, he does not discourage high school graduates to still
In the article, “Colleges Prepare People for Life,” Freeman Hrabowski compares his beliefs to those from a New York Times illustration on how college does, or does not, prepare young adults for success in life. Based on the content of the article, it is likely that the writer is attempting to inform students and young adults about the benefits of receiving a college education. A main point he includes is that many jobs in today’s society require some form of a degree to even apply. To convince his audience, Hrabowski utilizes an argument and counteracts the argument with facts to support his claims. His strategies are extremely effective in conveying his message as he uses strong evidence and factual information in stating his beliefs.
Lincoln Trias Ms. Fay Freshman English Feb 29, 2024 There’s other pathways to success other than College. Part 1 : Rhetorical Analysis “College may not be worth it anymore” by Ellen Ruppel Shell, brings awareness to the reader/ s that college is not always the pathway to success. Shell wants to show that there are other options other than going to college. Shell supports his main idea throughout the story many times, but one of the quotes that stood out to me most was, “If future income was determined mainly by how much education people received, then you would assume that some higher education would be better than none.
Marty Nemko, in the article, “We Send Too Many Students To College,” acknowledges that colleges have become obscenely expensive and that it is possible to be successful without going to college. Arguing that too many students are sent to college without realizing that it is not imperative, Nemko targets parents in his claims that colleges focus on educating in the cheapest way possible and most importantly, that the advantage of past college graduates in the job market is declining. One of his main reasons is that even though the average college graduate makes more money, hundreds of thousands of students in the bottom half of their high school class do not succeed in higher education. Nemko’s article is the most persuasive article on whether college education still has value as he argues that college is not beneficial to everyone through demonstrations of hyperbole, and figurative language.
The article "Some Lessons from the Assembly Line" by Andrew Braaksma, gives you ride a through the life of a blue-collar worker and the importance of investing in yourself with a college degree. The author discusses how spending summers working as a blue-collar worker at a factory in his hometown, makes him appreciate the opportunity to attend college. The author explains what his life would be like had he not decided to obtain a college degree and add value to his life. I can relate to the author from my own personal experiences with my job and learning how valuable a college education could be. I have missed several opportunities to advance and move up with my company because I didn't have a degree. Now that I’m in school I can also
In Freeman Hrabowski’s piece, “Colleges Prepare People for Life,” he mentions the differing opinions between going to college and choosing another path. Many people find college too expensive, and once a student graduates, he or she will face enormous debt and potentially risk still being unprepared for the working world. Hrabowski acknowledges this, and also notices that many students who do attend college occasionally make the wrong decision in terms of choosing a school and major. But while the stakes are high, he argues that college not only provides financial stability, but also allows students to become more virtuous citizens in the long run. He does this by providing information to backup his claims, using a passionate tone to explain his beliefs, and paralleling college attendance with good intentions.
In the essay “College Value Goes Deeper Than the Degree” author Eric Hoover claims a college education is important to one 's well-being so they can get a job and be productive in other parts of life. Promoters of higher education have long emphasized how beneficial college’s value and its purpose. Many believe the notion that colleges teach students are life skills to apply anywhere, they also work hard to earn a degree and learn specific marketable skills which they can use to get a good job. Though obtaining a college education and a degree is helpful in countless of ways, it is not necessary to pursue a college degree in world where a college degree is seen different now, people without turn out fine, the growing average of debt that students who attend college have to pay off and people without a degree can obtain many jobs that do not require college degrees.
In her article “College Is a Waste of Time and Money”, Caroline Bird attempts to pursued her readers that colleges are overflowing with students who don’t belong there. Her article first appeared in Psychology Today (May 1975). Since this material is outdated, I find it hard to believe that most of the responses by students and parents quoted in the article still hold true. The author has set out to pursue the readers that college is a bad and unnecessary choice for today’s youth. Yet the author holds a bachelors and a masters degree from two different universities. I would think that if she thought college was really a bad choice and a waste of time and money, she would not have gone back to get her masters degree.
He uses strong diction as he addresses how colleges are increasingly becoming “conventional bureaucracies” because behind every college program is a need for growth (Blank 263). This need he argues is how connections between colleges and outside companies begin to formulate as colleges develop “employment favoring tactics” (263). Thus colleges build up their clientele to help advertise such well known business corporations and offices to advertise “better jobs.” Blank continues by providing the most optimistic statistical evidence which “envision a 14.8 percent slice of 1975 job market, while they bring 31 percent of 18 to 24-year old age into college” (263). This estimates to about 10,664,000 students in college, “therefore, even if every one of the so-called professional and technical jobs were indeed reserved for them (which is itself patently impossible), the number of job openings would still be inadequate” (263). These facts introduce and support the idea that receiving a college degree is not to be associated with the key to “reserving a better job”. The details and numbers build an appeal to logos and impress upon the reader that this is a problem worth discussing, the statistics prove that although there are many students in college, not everyone will receive a job as the number of job openings are
He concludes the article with restating his thesis that it is definitely worth going to college today for almost everyone. He then goes on to end the article with the concept of the growing complexity of jobs in the economy and the necessity of a college education to meet the demands of the newly emerging economy (35). Leonhardt makes strong points to base his argument in this article and uses convincing language and credible sources to prove his agenda. He clearly makes an impact on his readers and clearly displays his position on an issue of great importance in today’s
The rise of college tuition along with room and board have lead many to believe that college isn’t worth the money. This among with the other factors of how getting a job into society is more difficult and that a college degree no longer competitive due to the high abundance of them. On the other side, many others urge the importance of a degree. They bring up how more jobs today require degrees, the return investment, and many other things.
College is seen as a requirement for a stable life. From an early age, we are taught that college is an essential step in life. Yet is college all that it is pumped up to be? Stephanie Owen and Isabel Sawhill along with Charles Murray gives us a good look into the benefits and drawbacks of going to college and take us on a journey of understanding that college may be a hindrance for some rather than an intelligent move.
Students from all over the United States are told all through their life that they need to attend college if they ever want to be successful, however, this is far from the truth. Often schools are culprits for driving students to attend money driven colleges, in other cases it is family. While schools all too often make the push on students to continue their schooling, parents can cause the same situation, as they may not have a degree and be working a low-paying factory job. Now kids already don’t want to be like their parents when they get older, so seeing them suffer in poverty or barely above the poverty line can cause some dissatisfaction, further seeking a degree to live a life that they never got. What many
Throughout the essay, Charles Murray stresses the idea that college is the wonderland of finding oneself and to find the career that one would want to follow for the rest of their lives. “College is seen as the open sesame to a good job and a desirable way for adolescents to transition to adulthood. Neither reason is as persuasive as it first appears.” Murray, C (2008) Practically spoken, this is not normally the case. College is a fair amount of work, much more work than one would normally acquire through any course of a high school or secondary school setting. In no way saying that the average student cannot meet the requirement and achieve success over the amounted work, it would also be ridiculous to expect every graduate to pursue going into higher education with the expansion of work that will be given.
The decision to obtain a higher education beyond high school is no longer a question of if, but when. This is the question that author Caroline Bird discusses in her article, “College is a Waste of Time and Money,” written in 1975. This text strives to convince students, parents, and advisors that obtaining a degree might not be in the best interest for those involved. Circling around the idea that college is a requirement and no longer an act of free will. Bird starts the article off strongly by building her credibility through her own personal research and other credible sources as well as appealing to readers through logical reasoning using numerous statistics, but fails to convince readers and discredits her ultimate goal through a disconnect in her use of analogies.