# Phi 103 (Informal Logic) Complete Class

2642 Words11 Pages
PHI 103 (Informal Logic) Complete Class

http://hwnerd.com/PHI-103-Informal-Logic-Complete-Class-1457.htm?categoryId=-1

If You Face Any Problem E- Mail Us At Contact.Hwnerd@Gmail.Com

Week 1 DQ 1 Arguments and Their Components.

Consider an argument you have recently had with a friend, family member, manager, co-worker, or someone else. Identify the topic of the argument and present that argument in premise-conclusion form, identifying both the premises and conclusion

Week 1 DQ 2 The Scope and Limits of Logic

Logic can do a great deal in helping us understand our arguments. Explain what advantages we obtain by studying logic in terms of
What do you know about it?

One way to make an inductive argument stronger is to

In logic, arguments are never described as

Week 3 Assignment Stereotype Paper
Read Stereotyping Has Lasting Negative Impact: Prejudice has lingering effects, study shows and watch How Pre-existing Beliefs Distort Logical Reasoning.

Discuss three stereotypes you encounter in your own life and the effect those stereotypes can have on others. This can be a stereotype you realize you have been guilty of holding or someone else's. Explain (a) what the stereotype is and (b) what sort of argument, no matter how flawed, might be used to support it, and (c) identify any mistakes you find in that argument.

The paper must be three pages in length (excluding title and reference page) and in APA (6th edition) format. You must use at least three resources, one of which must be the course text, and two resources must either be found in the Ashford Online Library or from the provided sources. If you would like to refer to APA samples and tutorials, log into the Ashford Writing Center (located in the Learning Resources tab in the left navigation bar). Click on the “APA & Research Guides” tab and review the resources.

Week 3 DQ 1 Fallacious Arguments
Considering the fallacies discussed in Chapter Four of An Introduction to Logic, construct three different arguments that display distinct fallacies. Give an explanation of why each makes a mistake in