Philosophical Ethical Theories Essay

Abortion raises subtle problems for private conscience, public policy, and constitutional law. Most of these problems are essentially philosophical, requiring a degree of clarity about basic concepts that is seldom achieved in legislative debates and letters to newspapers (Feinberg 1984: 1).

Abortion is a topic that when spoken about gives many individuals a sense of uncomfortableness and many tend to shy away from this topic; Because abortion is a topic which has sparked many debates on whether it is acceptable or not. Societies have developed different stigmas around abortion and it affects many woman and how they live there life. This topic is relevant to my generation as the stigma of abortion is still very prevalent. To properly look at this issue, one must look into many different aspects of the abortion argument. By narrowing down the research, I came to the conclusion of 4 major aspects that shape the stigma around abortion. The historical roles of a woman play a major role in the social construct of abortion. If historically a woman is meant to be a mother and a nurturer; how does abortion pertain to that idea and how can it effectively be justified? Additionally, the stigmatism around abortion currently and the main ideas of motherhood give abortion a tainted view for the individuals that are undergoing this operation or are in a situation to make that decision. If one is to be pushed away for her decision as well as affecting the individuals around her, what does that have to say about the already heavily stigmatised topic? As well, when looking into a topic, one must realize that traditions, norms, values and ideas come from years before and that the older generation plays a huge role in this. If the older generation was raised, and is raising

The ethical theory that best describes me is Consequentialism. Consequentialism the doctrine that the morality of an action is to be judged solely by its consequences. When I first read the meaning behind this theory it immediately stood out to me as a theory that I could closely relate to.

When defining what Ethical Theory is my first thought is morals. Morals principles affects the way people make decisions and the why people live their own lives. Ethics come from a Greek work ethos, and this means character, habits, customs and dispositions. The morals that Ethical theory will display in a person life, is living a good life for them and their families, knowing what is right in life and taking care of their responsibilities. Researchers, divides ethical theories into three basic groups, first group is meta- ethics, the second group is applied ethics and the last groups is normative ethics. Meta-ethics deals with origins and ethical principles. Applied ethics is related to controversial topic like politics or war. Normative ethics concerned with moral judgements of what is right or wrong. Reflecting back to meta-ethics is having morals judgments, morals allow people need morals and value to as a person. When a person realize what is important in determine moral judgment, and the ethical

Different generation have a different perspective view, while I was interviewing three generation of different ages, and I found out that all of them have a different view toward ethic. According to three generation, the generation with the old view, and thinking style believe that the ethic has to do more with behavior, like what’s good or bad, but they all have common about abortion. For example,They believe that the abortion is clearly wrong because they are killing innocent lives, and also believe that it is a grave injustice. I predicted that the next generation might think that the abortion should be legalized based on their situation.Abortion is a very controversial subject that people have been continually argued over for the past few years and probably many years to come. I believe abortion is morally and ethically wrong, because It ends human life. Abortion should not be legalize into any country because it is snatching the life of a child, it can harm the mother as well,it is also affecting our

The arguments mentioned above each focus on the fetus or human life and rights of the baby, the pragmatic approach examines the conditions under which the woman conceives. This approach to the issue of abortion establishes a sort of ethical hierarchy to ‘the most acceptable’ conditions under which it occurs. The same hierarchical nature is applied to the most acceptable reasons under which an abortion can take place. This approach solely examines the motivations of the woman and differentiates between self-caused (intentional) pregnancy and accidental pregnancy and justifiable reasons for pregnancy. The nature of the ethics of abortion are so convoluted given that they involve a unique two person situation with potential and actual rights that come into

Ethics is known as the “branch of study dealing with what is the proper course of action for man as well as the method by which we categorize our values and pursue them” (Rowlands, 2001). Ethics contains an important role in society as it is a systematic and critical analysis of morality and the moral factors that guide human conduct in a particular society or practise (FAO, 2004). The focus of this report will be on the ethical issue of abortion supported by the philosophical framework of act utilitarianism as well as the opposing ethical framework informed by the Catholic Social teaching principles of human dignity and rights and responsibilities. These views are conflicting as Catholic Social Teaching considers abortion to be murder and

Abortion has been a topic of ethics for as long as time can remember. Abortion is a difficult and controversial moral issue that most have dealt with or heard about. Most would argue that no one has the right to demand large sacrifices from another simply to sustain their own lives, while others see abortion as an act of killing, which is clearly wrong. Both sides have important moral insights, even if ultimately these insights are outweighed by the insights of the other side. Each and every person has their own viewpoint that is biased simply because of their religion or how they were raised. Opinions are passed on generation to generation and each generation with a more developed educated view attempts to change these views. The goal of this ethical argument is not to convince to accept one position or the other, but to help to understand both sides.

In an attempt to obtain a clearer awareness of my own ethical perspectives, I completed the Ethics Awareness Inventory. This inventory presented me with several questions into what I valued most and least as moral values. In addition, the inventory presented two sample situations involving ethical considerations from a management per-spective in a work environment.

People face ethical dilemmas every day. This brings to light what one’s personal ethics are based on. According to the lecture, “In a CWV ethics are grounded in absolute and universal moral principles that have been given by God. In modern culture, moral standards are subjective and based upon personal preference” (Lecture 16). In this essay a case study will be given and solutions to the dilemma will be given from two different worldviews. The ethical dilemma I have chosen to write about is abortion. I will first give the Christian worldviews opinion for this dilemma then I will give a naturalists worldview opinion.

Some people believed that abortion should be allowed at any stage and under any circumstances claiming that it is up to the mother to decide or control what happens in her body and that this is not an unjust act to kill a fetus in case of pregnancy. This false belief leads us to commit an act that is morally wrong and that should be solved from a different approach rather than by the killing a person.

The main issue is that people would say that fetuses are not a person until they have reached a certain stage of development usually the moment they are born or a months earlier than that. Other people would argue that a fetus becomes a person the minute they are conceived and that they should have rights even before they are born. A moral issue women face is the fear or being ashamed of getting an abortion. Being judged for making that decision and having to deal with it too. Making an ethical decision is not decided on those things. However looking at Aristotle’s ethics is teleological, his view is that “everything exist for a purpose/happens for a reason and for an end” (1).

The moral standings on abortion have been contemplated for numerous years. Depending on one’s personal beliefs, abortion can be looked at in many different ways and used for many different purposes. For example, abortions can be used due to the mother being unstable emotionally, mentally or financially. Also, people have abortions if the child is known to have life threatening health problems or birth defects. One of the more common arguments is whether or not the mother’s rights or the fetus's rights come first. For instance, many people view abortion as morally wrong because one is killing an innocent life, whereas others believe, women have the right to choose because she is the one carrying the fetus.

The issue of abortion is one of the most controversial matters in our modern society. Each day, hundreds of thousands of abortions occur every day around the world whether legally or illegally. The most critical issues in today’s bioethics are the controversy around the abortion. It has a long-discussed among politics, researchers and the public in term of morality or immorality of abortion, the legal right to life of the fetus or embryo. The question is, what is an embryo, what is an abortion and why the abortion of the embryo is so controversial that the politics, ethicists and the public are asking whether the abortion should be considered morally justifiable or immorally justifiable? The following line will give more details on these issues.

Ethics in a philosophical point of view allows humans to fully understand the importance of morality in a society. Throughout history, numerous philosophers have had their own sense of morality. For instance, Thomas Hobbs considered morality as simply as a social contract between cultures through the establishment of laws, however others like Immanuel Kant saw it as an internal duty that all humans unconsciously share and owe each other. Most people must side with one spectrum of a topic than the other to determine an action is moral. Topics such as abortion, war, marriage etc… have infiltrated modern liberal’s conversations. I will write this paper about abortion and, to support my opinion, I will first compare the arguments previously made by four well known philosophers: Mary Ann Warren, Patrick Lee, Robert P. George, and Judith Jarvis Thomson. After partaking on whichever side, I will then apply a specific ethical theory that will help explain what influenced my decision, then cover any possible objections and finish with any current improvements being made to appease the tension from the topic. Abortion is the deliberate termination of a human pregnancy. For such a heartfelt topic, it needs has been a practice since the ancient times They always contradict with the people that consider themselves traditional.