Philosophy of Management Leadership Essay

The essays that comprise Traditional Classics on Leadership present varying notions of authority and of challenging authority. This is largely due to the fact that this manuscript is comprised of essays from 31 contributors, ranging from well-known political theorists to some of the more salient voices for individuality that the world has known. Still, there are some points of commonalities in these essays that present a synthesized viewpoint of the concept of challenging authority.

What is leadership, and how do we attain the best and most effective leaders? These are questions that are as old as civilization itself. Bass (1974) wrote that, “from its infancy, the study of history has been the study of leaders” (as cited in Wren, 1995, p. 50). Since the study of history in the West is commonly held to begin with Herodotus of ancient Athens, it is not surprising that we should examine the historical views of leadership through the eyes of two titans of Greek thought: Plato and Aristotle.

My leadership philosophy stems from my experience in the Army. As a leader, I believe in honesty, commitment, and respect for others. All responsibilities should be carried out in a timely manner. My main priority is the well-being of my Soldiers. My Soldiers can expect me a leader that is caring, dedicated, and upholds the standards.

When we hear the word leadership or leader, the first thing some people imagine is a great military commander or king standing in front of his people and issuing orders. If we think about it more closely, we will realize that leadership is not only a creation of ancient history but we deal with it on a regular basis. To find a leader we don’t need to look far, presidents, politicians, business managers, sport stars and even every day people possess leadership qualities. Although the meaning of leadership may seem at first easy to define, but

Management plays an important role in almost every aspect of a person’s life. Many people do their best to manage their personal time, money, goals, and decisions. People also tend to have some form of management in their social and family lifestyles. Management is important to understand and consider for a variety of situations. My focus in this paper will be to relate my management philosophies to defined management styles. I will also to describe my personal and social management philosophies and how they compare and contrast to one another.

From Mahatma Gandhi and Nelson Mandela’s charisma, to Winston Churchill and Martin Luther King’s intelligence and Steve Jobs’ analytical nature, there can be as numerous ways to lead as there are leaders (Crossman, 2010). Leadership is a hot debate both in the business world and other areas of the society. Throughout the world's, there have been as many leadership models as there have been their commentators (Burns & Peltason, 1966). Fortunately, psychologists and businesspersons have established useful frameworks that refer to the main ways of leadership.

Creighton’s (2007) statement early in the article about how today’s successful leaders do not fit the stereotype of highly visible, nationally recognized, risk-taking, or charismatic individuals seems like such a simple idea, but has so many applications. He dared to say that good leadership is not aggressive and quick, but thoughtful and quite.

The Taoist philosopher Lao Tzu put it best when he said, “A leader is best when people barley know he exists, When his work is done, his aim fulfilled, They will say: We did it ourselves.” Often when a person thinks of a leader they think of such great leaders as George Washington, George Patton, and Thomas Jackson. The word “leader” itself will invoke images of die-hard men with the charisma to command anyone and overcome anything. Yet despite this common image there was no theory of leadership that covered this common belief in a “super” leader.

The phrase “great leaders born not made” has been popularized by many psychologists and sociologists. The Great Man Theory of leadership associated with the nineteenth century historian Thomas Carlyle argued that “heroes shape history through the vision of their intellect, the beauty of their art, the prowess of their leadership, and, most important, their divine inspiration”. (Hirsch, Kett and Trefil 2002). This thinking that great leaders are born, not made has evolved over time as leadership becomes more widely researched and understood.

Every manager must have a set of principles, values, and core beliefs that he must follow. These principles, values, and beliefs make up his philosophy of management. Webster defines philosophy as “the most basic beliefs, concepts, and attitudes of an individual or group.” (Webster) I will be discussing the principles, values, and beliefs I as a manager will have to do my job efficiently. I will also discuss the different biblical beliefs that support my management style.

The “great man” notion of leadership asserts that only a few men, those who possess certain identifiable qualities or characteristics (that are said to be unique to them), which gives them the distinct ability to achieve greatness, make a difference, lead and move “history forward substantially and dramatically because of their greatness” (Van Wart, 2015, p. 9). These abilities apply specifically to only those who are born into greatness; education, wealth, connections and senior appointments, for instance. The theory also assumes that since leader qualities are inherent, they cannot be easily learned. Membership in this

and visions. At this point, it decides which direction is more cost effective for the Postal

The purpose of this paper is to discuss differences between management and leadership within a familiar organization. To understand the differences between a manager and a leader, one must probe their roles and responsibilities respectively and consider the origins of their similarities. No longer is it enough to understand these aspects of management within the American boarders, but it is imperative to gain an appreciation of these skills on a global stage as distances and cultures are waning barriers to business. An endeavor to recommend two strategies that managers and leaders can use to maintain and create a healthy organization will conclude the paper.

If there is a general trait of leadership that plays a part in all situations it is relatively unimportant in determining an individual’s success as a leader. To a considerable extent the manifestation of leadership is determined by the social situation. Under one set of circumstances an individual will be a good leader and under others he will be a poor one.

“Being a leader is a complex fate. Although contradictions and clashing expectations are part of life, they are especially present in the exercise of leadership” (Cronin and Genovese 2012, 1).