Phone Tracking Research Paper

Police being able to search your phone without is warrant is a violation of privacy and the fourth amendment. This is an ongoing issue that is currently in the Supreme Court and state courts, which have split opinions on the issue. The courts are having a lot of trouble grasping what to compare a cell phone to as far as searching it. A big case that they are comparing searching cell phones to is over 40 years old and it involves a police officer searching through a cigarette box and finding drugs. A judge in the 9th circuit against warrantless search debunked the cigarette box comparison by saying phones are more like a suitcase, except the suitcase contains everything that you have ever traveled with in your entire life,

Did you know Argentina is the most sociable country in the world (Document 4)? As of lately there has been a national debate national as to the detriment of cell phone usage, specifically in young people as well as in the parents of young children. It has gone so far as to the Oregon State Legislature designating a task-force to examine the hidden costs of cell phone and smartphone usage on individuals. Many speculate the task-force will shape the laws and restrictions placed upon smartphone users for future generations (Assignment). While luddites could argue that cell phones wrap you up in yourself, cell phones bring people together, as well as being useful and a tool people use everyday.

The essay, Cellphones by Rex Murphy is an informal persuasive essay on the topic of cell phones and how distracting they are. The essay is a cause and effect essay that implicitly conveys the thesis, arguing that cell phones are distracting and inhibit driving. The writer attempts to use humour mixed with a very negative tone to raise awareness among Toronto citizens of the dangers of cell phones, following the movement that calls for cell phones to be banned in cars in Toronto. Although distracted driving is a very serious issue, the writer failed to write an objective, relevant and valid essay that is effective in convincing people.

In the article "Our Cell Phones, Ourselves," by Christine Rosen, she explains the dependency on cell phone use while highlighting unforeseen consequences that may occur with cellular device use. From allowing parents to track down their children, to having a casual conversation with a friend, cell phones offer people an unparalleled level of convenience. Furthermore, cell phone owners feel much safer knowing that in an emergency, help is just a phone call away. This convenience, however, does not come without any negative effects. Many cell phone owners become too engrossed in their phones and therefore ignore the physical world, an idea that Rosen refers to as "absent presence.” Also, people may use their phones as a way to prove they are

Cell phones are so much more than just an electronic. They are huge parts of our personal welfare. Cell phones are used to call for help, make appointments, contact loved ones, set reminders, and so much more. If you get lost somewhere, you have navigation right there in

Telephone is a telecommunications device used to communicate between two or more people in any distance. Primarily telephones were used only for communication purposes but today telephones are as powerful and useful as computers are. With the evolution of phones, many things have changed which includes phone records. In past, phone records involved only phone numbers but today there is so many data and information on phones. These records include phone numbers, bank information, personal pictures and videos, location and text messages. These records are often used by law enforcers to investigate crimes by gathering information from phone records. Since 1970 many things has changed. This paper examines the technological differences between phone records in the 1970 and smartphones, privacy and how courts affect the technology.

Here is a major concern with why people do not have conversations with other, they are already preoccupied with the device in their palm. That same study reports that 73% of phone users get panicked when not knowing the location of their phone, 14% get desperate, and 7% get sick to their stomach (Mobile Mindset, 2012). These emotional reactions lead one to believe that a person’s entire life is on that one device and so when that device has an unknown location it would give them that panicked reaction. By no means is it wrong to have these reactions, but it is a bit overwhelming to think that a lost phone could give more worry than losing a job or the passing of a relative/significant other. In turn, cell phones give people much to worry about and so knowing physiological triggers of use or disappearance is notable.

Privacy is something that most people believe is not possible on the internet, but with the correct knowledge it can be possible. In Nicholas Carr’s essay “Tracking Is an Assault on Liberty”, he states that “It is very easy to find information about people on the internet, even private things that people don’t expect others to be able to see” (538). People don’t realize that what they do online can affect their personal lives such as their credit score, the ads that are recommended to them, and even the cookies in their computer. While Carr may have great points, he may not have considered the ways people do have privacy. There are some ways to protect browsing, people just need to know how. Most browsers have a mode that allows people to visit sites without being tracked. There’s no history, and no cookies.

Do you like saving money? Of course you do. In-store tracking is a great way to help you do just that. And while many people have different opinions about whether or not stores should be allowed to use in-store tracking, I am all for it. Cell phone tracking benefits customers in multiple ways. It allows businesses to improve the shopping experience, make checkout easier, and tailor coupons to your liking.

The issue of whether cell phone searches are covered by the fourth amendment and subjected to warrant has long been a debate in the judiciary system. Looking deeply into cases regarding this issue, several court have upheld the searches to be legitimate and therefore found it liable under the amendment. This justification can be traced to a clause, which is a section of the clause of the Fourth Amendment. That is “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures”. Furthermore, there has been past cases that has successfully been decided by the court judges to be a warrantless search. This type of case can be seen with the “Bond versus United states” in 2010.

Stalking is a terrifying and potentially lethal crime that seems to be on the rise in recent years. While the act itself can be displayed in a variety of ways with many different motivations, the effects on the victims always result in some sort of fear, anxiety, and paranoia among others, along with crippling the victim financially. The media portrayal of stalking can lead to misconceptions about the crime and minizations of the behavior by the general public can lead to a secondary victimization and cause the crime to go unreported. Although anti-stalking laws exist they vary from state to state and may not always provide the adequate of protection, even a person convicted of stalking will only serve a year or less in prison if no other charges

The main idea of the article “Are You Being Tracked” is Public Safety vs. Public Rights. The practices is raising concerns about civil liberties in a debate that pits public safety against privacy rights. The Fourth Amendment of the Constitution Protects against “Unreasonable searches and seizures”. This traditionally means that police must have either a court issued warrant or “probable cause” to search someone’s property.

Over the past few decades, technology has changed dramatically in our country. Cell phones were invented about forty years ago, and have been perfected every year since. Cell phones, or smart phones have affected the lives of many individuals in our country by providing a direct line of communication, access to social media, and connect individuals to new marketplaces and jobs.

Have you ever wondered what would the world resemble in the event that we didn 't have any cell phones? Why is it that we get out of our comfort zone when we do not have access to our phones? Nowadays, cell phones have such a noteworthy effect on our day to day lives, and we owe it to the advancement of technology. In this research paper, we will take a closer look at this phenomenon by examining the evolution of cell phone devices, and it’s effects on society.

As Ray Burke talked about in his speech “How stores track your shopping behavior / Ray Burke / TEDx Indianapolis”, the retailers, such as the Marsh supermarkets, are analyzing the backgrounds and the family structures of the consumers which are their personal information, which may get them in a dangerous situation when these data are disclosed to the third parties such as someone with nefarious purposes and the fraud companies. If these data of the information is running without regulation and protection, it would be easy to be used by those who want to defraud the customers. The methods used by the retail industry as an undercurrent manipulation are not only gathering information through the check-out scanner but also recording videos through cameras as well as many other ways such as analyzing the search records of an individual who shop online, which may provide some malicious people with the access to the personal information. As the result, there are many people have received tons of spammers which include numerous false advertisement due to the information leaks. On the other hand, as to those VCRs, such as the videotape library of Paco Underhill, according to “The Science of Shopping” (Malcolm Gladwell), things will turn out to be terrible if these videos resource are hacked by criminals, such as the stalkers and the