Photo Enforcement Essay

I am always scared that my manager is going to look at the cameras after every shift and she would find a moment in which I was not working to my fullest potential, and would reprimand me. I also feel like surveillance systems can be used as a defense for the worker whenever they believe that or accuse a customer for shoplifting. All the worker would have to do is quickly go back and review the cameras before making their statement. If a customer feels that they are being harassed or discriminated by a worker, all the customer would have to do is make a request for the manager to review the surveillance tapes and then the customer’s claim will either be justified and taken into consideration, or it will be discarded. Cameras mounted on street signs can log cars by license plate number, scan facial characteristics, and take notes of vehicles repeatedly circling or driving above or below the speed limit. About two summers ago, my friends and I took a day-trip down to Washing D.C. I decided to drive down there since my car was the safest and out of all of the other cars, my car had the most gas in it. While we were down there, I accidentally ran a red

Technology is becoming so advance police officers do not need to be present to give someone a speeding ticket. The automatic number plate recognition started with a bad reputation. People would complain that it was a waste of taxpayer money because the camera took blurry photos. “Of course” over time the plate recognition improved and is good for stopping people from speeding. Law enforcement even has video cameras at stoplights and of course people were complaining. Some people said the government is trying to invade people’s privacy and spy on everyone. If it were not for those cameras the little eight-year-old girl that was taking from in front of her home last week would have probably been murdered. The video of the truck helped a man identify the truck and rescue the little girl. Sometimes a written description just is not enough.

There is no doubt that red-light cameras have gained increasing popularity among local municipalities following Florida’s 2010 decision allowing local governments to install them. The city of Lakeland elected to install nine additional cameras in just the past three years alone (Dunkelberger). Revenue and citations are not the only things that red-light cameras are generating; more and more citizens and legislators are sparking the news and interest of the media regarding the constitutionality of red-light cameras. Last year Hernando County Judge, Donald E. Scaglione, issued a statement calling the laws surrounding red-light camera violations "vague (and) arbitrary and capricious." While red light camera supporters argue that the cameras make intersections much safer, others insist that constitutional rights are being blatantly violated by state and local government. Most Americans agree that intersections and roadways need to be made safer, but at what cost?

Marfin stated the different issues presented for the department, such as the individual privacy and cost as she discussed UTPD’s process of implementing this technology. She emphasized this by stating “UTPD began testing different versions of body cameras two years ago, but the implementation of the technology took many years to complete” (par.9). Although the time and cost of the body-cameras brought issues to the department the author emphasizes that UTPD’s main goal is to build trust between the community and the police officers to ensure the community’s safety. Therefore, they made sure to invest in their safety by enforcing body cameras on the officers as explained in the article, ““This is something we believe is important to the UT community and to UTPD,” UTPD Chief David Carter said. “This is something to ensure that people have confidence and trust when it comes to our department.”” (par. 3). Throughout the article the cost of the cameras is highlighted informing how the technology works and what exactly it does to preserve the safety in the community. She emphasizes this statement by saying

This could be solved through some big manufactures or through many small ones, which can help these companies out and also add to the peace throughout the communities. Another claim is that these cameras are unmanageable, they take too much storage up, which also leads into the most controversial element, privacy. Turning these cameras on and have them always running is subject to invade the privacy of our citizens in some way at the least. A solution to this is not having the cameras always run, but when an officer gets a call or when a circumstance comes up. Also, is vital and timing is everything, and it needs to be heavily implemented in teaching officers about these body

With the increasing emergence of traffic cameras around the nation, there has emerged a debate about whether the cameras are effectively functioning to keep drivers safe or whether they are just another source of revenue for cites. Facts have proven that the purpose for the traffic cameras is simply generating more money for the cities. The estimated amount of money that the city of Denver will be making in 2011 from these cameras (Kaminsky)—excluding the ones recently put up—a grand estimation total of seven million dollars… “According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety more than 550 communities in the United States use red light cameras.” (Urie) Research shows how the cameras are not improving safety for drivers, and for

First off, having street cameras all over town can be a very useful thing. In the article “Sonoma County, following a global trend, is focusing cameras on public spaces” by Paul Payne, Payne writes about a man that was caught on camera breaking the gate to a parking garage, by cameras in the garage. With law enforcement watching those cameras, police were able to arrest the man before he could even get into his car in the parking garage. "What's nice

There’s a huge controversy nowadays with police body cameras. These devices should be effective right? Well, there are counter-arguments that explains why it’s not. Law enforcement is a difficult field to be in period, especially right now with all the murders police officers have committed in the past few years. The police always had a bad reputation, but within these past years, it has become terrible.

Recently some American police departments, large and small, have started employing the use of small body cameras on officers. These cameras are often hidden or otherwise difficult to see and discern. These cameras are costly, often an invasion of privacy, and easily manipulated. There are currently no laws or regulations regarding the use of these cameras, and no real consequences for misuse of them. As such, body cameras on police officers in the US should not be employed.

A lot of articles that you come by while surfing the internet may look really good. Then if you actually read and look into the article it turns out poorly written, with grammar and spelling problems. However, the article done on police body cams was an exception. The article contains over 2000 words and has a great format with magnificent facts stated. It gives the pros and cons, and then analyzes both sides in many paragraphs. The writer provides both an interesting, yet factual article on whether or not police body cams should be a requirement for all the departments in America.

In a case highlighted by The police staff an Arizona police officer had a confrontation one day on the job that ended up in a fight with the individual that he confronted. The bystanders videoed the fight but not the whole confrontation. Later on the video taken by the bystanders became viral and put the officer in a bad light with the public for using force with the person he confronted, but luckily for him he was wearing a body-worn camera that was issued to him. The video on his camera showed the whole confrontation and cleared up all the questions and false judgments of the police officer that the public had put on him. This was just one of many instances that body cameras have helped recently since they have only been in use in some areas for a short period of time now. Body worn cameras are small, compact, as well as lightweight so they do not inconvenience the user. They have been used for many reasons by many different realms of people throughout the short time they have been in production. A few police departments around the country have started implementing the use of body cameras. The idea of having all police officers wearing body cameras is up in the air without any decision set in stone as of now. There are many different organizations doing research on the use of body cameras, and the effects they have both in the positive aspects and how they help and some of the negative properties that might be brought up by both police

The expansion of surveillance technologies has forced police departments to consider which measures to deploy. The application of the measures must be weighed carefully against what the public desires, the legality of the measure, and what

There are many crimes that happen every day that can be solved by the government. They have access to cameras in public buildings that can help catch the criminals who have performed the crime. From ABC News, Kevin Dolak’s article, "Private Surveillance Cameras Catching More Criminals,” he wrote, “Philadelphia detectives were able to quickly make an arrest in the murder and burning of a female pediatrician by viewing surveillance video of nearby stores and a hospital that captured the suspect entering the doctor’s home and later getting into his truck.” Bolts shouts, “’The Puppet Master was just here!’” (Petry 62). If the government could have surveilled the room that Bolts was in they could have caught Bolts red handed. It is a benefit for us to have the government surveilling the cameras so that they can catch a criminal or solve a

Recently, the matter of installing CCTV cameras has been discussed by the council of my hometown since the criminal rate has been scaling up. During this days an act has been approved and lots of cameras have been installed, paying attention to the suburbs especially, where the criminal rate has doubled over the last two years.

Security cameras are a very controversial topic when it comes to a public space. Some feel it is a necessary part of our culture while others see it as an invasion on their privacy while interacting within a public space. Security Cameras have become an important crime prevention and security measure within public spaces. Public space is defined as “all areas that are open and accessible to all members of the public in a society” (Orum & Neal, 2010). This definition of public space helps to grasp why security cameras may be present within a certain parameter. Many people feel that security cameras are needed when the general public can easily access the area without any real supervision to protect themselves and spots they travel through. When an area can be accessed by a variety of people there should be rules and regulations to ensure that security cameras are put to good use.