Physician Assisted Suicide Summary

According to Paul J. van der Wal et al. in ¨Euthanasia, Physician-Assisted Suicide, and Other Medical Practices Involving the End of Life in the Netherlands, 1990–1995¨, he addresses that assisted suicide should be legal and regulated. The authors’ purpose of writing this journal article is to make reliable estimates of euthanasia; to describe patients and physicians, and to evaluate changes between 1990 and 1995. Even though assisted suicide is a growing taboo, it is being practiced more each and every day. Paul J. van der Wal et al. chose to conduct two studies to answer their hypotheses.

Suicide is one person’s personal decision; physician-assisted suicide is a patient who is not capable of carrying the task out themselves asking a physician for access to lethal medication. What people may fail to see however is that the physician is not the only healthcare personnel involved; it may include, but is not limited to, a physician, nurse, and pharmacist. This may conflict with the healthcare worker’s own morals and there are cases in which the patient suffers from depression, or the patient is not receiving proper palliative care. Allowing physician-assisted suicide causes the physician to become entangled in an ethical and moral discrepancy and has too many other issues surrounding it for it to be legal.

One of the most controversial end-of-life decisions is “physician-assisted suicide” (PAS). This method of suicide involves a physician providing a patient, at his or her own request, with a lethal dose of medication, which the patient self-administers. The ethical acceptability and the desirability of legalization of this practice both continue to cause controversy (Raus, Sterckx, Mortier 1). Vaco v. Quill and Washington v. Glucksberg were landmark decisions on the issue of physician-assisted suicide and a supposed Constitutional right to commit suicide with another's assistance. In Washingotn v. Glucksberg, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the state of Washington's ban on physician-assisted suicide was not unconstitutional.

1. (problem – PAS): In today’s society, Physician Assisted Suicide is one of the most questionable and debatable issues. Many people feel that it is wrong for people to ask their doctor to help them end their life; while others feel it is their right to choose between the right to life and the right to death. “Suffering has always been a part of human existence.” (PAS) “Physicians have no similar duty to provide actions, such as assistance in suicide, simply because they have been requested by patients. In deciding how to respond to patients ' requests, physicians should use their judgment about the medical appropriateness of the request.” (Bernat, JL) Physician Assisted Suicide differs from withholding or discontinuing medical treatment, it consists of doctors providing a competent patient with a prescription for medication to aid in the use to end their life.

Should physician-assisted suicide be legal? Physician-assisted suicide should be legalized. People should finally have the choice if they wanted to. It could relieve suffering and help whoever wants to die peacefully. It could help a lot of people in the world. 79% of people say that physician-assisted suicide be legal. However it should not be legalized.

"Who Owns the Right to Die?", authored by Miranda Barbuzzi, lays out an argument about the legal status of euthanasia and assisted suicide in Canada. Barbuzzi pulls the reader in by examining the controversial and long-contentious topic of assisted suicide and euthanasia. She does this by exploring primarily ethos (ethical/moral aspects), pathos, and logos (logical arguments) through current court findings and appeals in the Canadian court system. She further explores the legal issues through the Netherlands that aids to the authors credibility and further defines her argument. The article compels the reader to absorb and weigh her findings.

I believe physician assisted suicide should be legal because it is your right and better to do it with a doctor than by yourself at home.

Hospice care has not been around for very longs but it is one of the fastest growing medical fields in the country, with over 1.58 million patients being cared for in 2010 alone. Hospice is an important part of caring for terminally ill patients and helps the families and loved ones to grieve.

Although it is almost self explanatory, being a procedure where an assistant or physician ends or terminates one's life, and a prescribed medication is given, can define an assisted suicide. Commonly, but not always, one is diagnosed with a disease or sickness that can no longer be dealt with. Refusing to take the natural path some believe God has planned for those who believe, but can no longer bear the pain, they come to the idea of assisted suicide. Physician assisted suicide shall give people not only the right to be treated equally or the right to die in a healthy, and happier way but shall additionally give them the right to determine when and where they die.

life by physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia. One of the reasons why states have concerns and interests in these two forms of suicide is because, “the state has an interest in the preservation of human life, and that far too many lives are lost prematurely” (Wellman, 2003). A great number of people that are elderly and dying will go to hospice. Hospice is where people go to die. It involves not giving food, fluids, or medicine to their patients. However, if their patients are starving and dehydrated then that is a form of suicide by not giving them the proper nutrition. Individuals would have closure with families, friends, and be able to make proper arrangements for their assets, if physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia were

Death is not a topic that many people are comfortable with, some people believe it is outrageous for others to play God and decide when to end their lives. While this is true for people with normal pains, there are those who feel they have the right to choose their own fate because they cannot bear their pain and suffering anymore. These are people that are terminally ill, people who were diagnosed with a deadly disease without a cure and feel that death is the only way to relieve that pain. These people has gone through many treatments that are slowly becoming less and less effective. Even though the treatment isn’t working, the patients still have to live through the pain from the treatments. Terminally ill

Vicki D Lachman, the president of the V.L. Associates, is a nationally renowned author of hundreds of publications and of over three thousand presentations. The major topics of Dr. Lachman’s work are based on leadership, moral courage, and a strong emphasis on ethics. The 35 years of her career began with a BSN and graduate degree in psychiatric nursing, a doctoral degree in education, and a masters in Bioethics. While deepening her understanding of the health care field she also served as a trustee on the board of the; Chestnut Hill Hospital, Cape Regional Medical Center, and the American Nurses Association Center for Ethics and Human Rights Advisory Board. Before retiring as a Clinical Professor at Drexel University her third book Ethical

Taking a pro approach for physician assisted suicide, Jones’s article delivers the facts to why physician assisted suicide becomes legal. Physician assisted suicide is indeed legal in five U.S states such as, California, Oregon, Washington, Vermont, and Colorado. Rather than the article being good or bad, this text is highly biased. Jones provides facts to why physician assisted suicide should be legalized. Applying this article helps provide factual evidence about the Death with Dignity laws.

This case study discusses the moral problems associated with physician-assisted suicide. The Catholic Church is apposed to such euthanasia because it transgresses God's commandment not to kill innocent life, it usurps God's sovereignty over human lives, and it violates obligations to serve others and the common good (Pg. 318). I can understand why the Catholic Church would be apposed to physician-assissted suicide, however I do not take this position. I support Oregon's Death with Dignity Act. Statistics show only a very small percent of patients, 0.132 percent, chose to end their life with euthanasia under this law between 1998 and 2010. Although Christians view such a suicide equally as wrong as murder, these beliefs are not shared by all

If you are constantly in pain, struggling through each day, would you want to wait in hopes of getting better, or do what you can to find instant relief? Patients faced with this decision are conflicted because in most places the act of physician assisted suicide is illegal. According to the author, Andrea Nakaya, “The word euthanasia comes from the Greek word for ‘the good death,’ and it is generally understood as taking deliberate action to end a life, usually to relieve intolerable suffering” (Nakaya 6). Patients suffering from an illness do not always have the option of “the good death” because of those who find assisted suicide morally wrong. People who are against assisted suicide believe that if it is legalized, it will be abused, but