preview

Piaget Juice Observation Essay

Best Essays

Research report
By Christopher Brockwell

Abstract
The theory being tested was Piaget’s Conservation experiment. It involved one participant, two stools, a round table, a tablecloth, one tall tubular glass and two beaker glasses (both filled with juice). The aim of this experiment was to test whether the participant could distinguish which out of the two beakers (one tall and thin, the other short and rotund) contained the most juice.
In response to the question posed, the participant responded that the tall tubular glass contained the most juice, even though both contained the same amount of juice. Piaget predicted a new logic would enter the mind forming a new kind of intelligence. Research showed that unevenness instead of monolithic …show more content…

Donaldson argued that children form a model of the world by formulating hypotheses that help anticipate events in the future on the basis of past experiences. The child therefore has expectations about any scenario and their interpretation of the words they hear will be influenced by the expectations they bring to the situation. (Smith, Cowie, Blades, 2011).
Vygotksy would state learning is not part of development, but only when properly organised learning can result in mental development that sets in motion a variety of developmental processes that would be impossible asides from learning. Therefore learning is a vital part and universal feature for the process of developing culturally organised, and in particular human, psychological functions. (Cole, John-Steiner, Scribner, Souberman, 1978).
Much of Piaget’s early work involved the “clinical method” – children being asked questions in a somewhat unstructured way, the onus being to establish whether they understood different problems. This approach was criticised for being unscientific, with Piaget and his fellow workers eventually being more precise in their experiments. It was agreed however that Piaget posed problems in a way that young children found difficult to comprehend. (Eysenck,

Get Access