Piere V. Society Of Sisters Case Summary

RULE: The court concluded that the segregation of African American school children “generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.”

In summarizing the salient points of the Supreme Court case Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow, it had to do with the respondent’s father who sued candidates, including a school region, affirming that the school locale's approach requiring the recitation of the Pledge of Allegiance at his little girl's school damaged the First Amendment. The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit found that the father had standing and decided for the father. Certiorari was conceded to audit the standing and First Amendment issues.

In closing, Justice Abe Fortas and Justice Hugo Black both give valid testimony for their side of the argument; however, Fortas’ profusion of cited evidence outweighs Black’s mainly opinionated case. And even though this may seem like just another court case to be cited one day, it can go a long way in protecting students’

The Supreme Court ruled that education was extremely important and "the very foundation of good citizenship" 1. In addition, the Supreme Court said segregation implied inferiority in a child and made them not want to try as they wouldn't be recognized if they did 1. The court supported good education as being necessary to succeed in life. They ruled access to a good education was “a right which must be made available to all on equal terms.”

Decision: The court ruled against the school district and upheld the establishment clause of the first

Petitions were filed and New York State upheld the case and then sent it to the Supreme Court(Britannica School High paragraph 2).

During the 1970s the court reviewed the constitutionality of compelled exemptions for religiously motivated conduct (1673). In Wisconsin v. Yoder the Court held that there was an important state interest in universal education but the law to compel students to go to school infringed on the free exercised rights. Chief Justice Burger, “lauded the virtues of the Amish and their social practices. In Employment Division v. Smith, the Court held that the use of peyote for religious purposes does not protect the persons from a denial of unemployment benefits. Justice Scalia stated, “We have never held that an individual’s religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that the State is free to regulate” (1676).

This case has also set the groundwork for forthcoming cases such as Bethel School District v. Fraser where the courts decision was based on this landmark case. It was stated that basically “students are not granted the same coextensive rights as adults in other settings outside of school”. Institutions of education still apply the decisions made in New Jersey v. T.L.O. to today’s school settings to maintain order and accountability of student well

Starting in the 1960s as the turmoil surrounding Brown V. Board of education died down, parents and taxpayers began to bring lawsuits against state funding systems arguing that these systems violated either state or federal constitutions (Augenblick, Myers & Anderson, 1997). Thus far, federal claims have all failed. In 1973, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled on the San Antonio independent School

An Analysis of the Shifting Results of Supreme Court cases Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940) and West Virginia Board of Education v. Barnette (1943)

Paraphrase or Summary:“In its opinion, the court majority stated that "the constitutional rights of students in public school are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other.”

As schools began segregating, the Supreme Court had to make sure that a school system didn’t admit a small few and then deny access to a

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states that every person in the United States has the right to exercise his or her own belief, or none at all, whatever their choice may be. Our nation's forefathers who were not of the same religious upbringings themselves recognized the greatest way to defend religious freedom was to retain the government out of religion so they generated the First Amendment to secure the separation of church and state (American Civil Liberties Union, n.d.). This important liberty is a main motivation why the U.S. has achieved to avoid a lot of the spiritual battles that have divided so many other states separately.

Supreme Court heard and decided the Pierce v. Society of the Sisters case with the Pierce v. Hill Military Academy case. The court reviewed the Compulsory Education Act and the allegations of both private organizations. The Society of the Sisters stated that enactment impinges on the rights of the students, parents, teachers, and school. Though the law had not yet taken effect, enrollment at private schools in the state suffered a steady decline, resulting in loss of property. Pierce appealed the District Court’s decision, arguing that the state’s interest in education superseded that of the students and parents, the school’s business loss was not covered under due process rights because it was an organization, and the suits were filed too

Oregon’s Compulsory Education Act was approved on November 7, 1922. This act mandated parents to enroll their children ranging from eight through 16 to public schools. Therefore, this caused parochial and private schools to lose their students; moreover, the organizations would also lose profit. Although the act would not go into effect until September 1, 1926, many parochial and private schools were already seeing withdraws. The plaintiff of the case was the Society of Sisters who had lots of religious and educational duties. The Society of Sisters argued that the act was unconstitutional because it denied the First Amendment freedom of religion. Also, the act prohibited parents and students to choose a school of their liking. In addition,