Plagiarism And Its Effect On The Academic Assessment System

Almost every student has been there: staring at his/her computer trying to get an assignment done when they have twenty other obligations swinging over his/her head. Students are trying to find the fastest and easiest way to get the assignment completed. Many students will plagiarize intentionally or unintentionally at some point of their educational career. Plagiarism is the act of taking someone else’s work or ideas then calling that work their own. There is no acknowledgement being given to the original author. In Trip Gabriel’s “Plagiarism Lines Blur for Students in Digital Age,” the internet has created new challenges for students being able to give credit to ideas and information. Often, Students do not understand that information on

Academic dishonesty such as plagiarism has been a major factor in education that has affected students’ success and academic achievements in recent years. Plagiarism according to Park (2003) is the act of appropriating or copying another person’s work and passing them on as one’s idea without acknowledging the original source. Park (2003) noted that plagiarism is a growing problem and has been a misuse of the writings of another author, their ideas, hypothesis, theories, research findings and interpretations. Furthermore studies by Chao, Wilhelm and Neureuther (2009) emphasised that

Plagiarism, by almost every light, is a serious problem deserving of time, attention and care. However, its prevention is a complex, difficult question, complicated by excessive sloth and lack of action from administrators. The article “A Question of Honor”, written by William Chace, a professor and concerned citizen, is effective at reaching its intended audience. Largely, the intended audience is students, professors, and administrators who are concerned with plagiarism and wish to stop it. Consequently the purpose of the article, the prevention of plagiarism, is addressed. The article was originally published in American Scholar in the Spring 2012 issue. It can be located in the Ethics in Higher Education, edited by Nancy Henke et al. Chace’s thesis suggests that plagiarism can be prevented by the culture associated with the university. The article was originally put in an academic journal, making its audience somewhat easier to determine. As well, the article uses appeals to scholarly professionals. The text spends a good portion of the prologue establishing the claim that there is a chronic problem of plagiarism present in this culture. In the body text of the article, Chace first of all presents counterarguments to the idea that cheating is an acceptable way to learn how to write, then spends the majority of the article describing how to prevent cheating. This is effective for the genre, a persuasive article in an

The basis of Pecorari’s research uses seventeen students selected among four subjects at three British universities, in which international students participated. After the students wrote their papers an equation was formulated to calculate the plagiarism percentage. Every student in the investigation cited their source wrong in some way. Some students even had a one hundred percent passage match with their source, which in most academic circles is plagiarism. Pecorari gives explanations for plagiarism: intentional, culture differences, and patchwriting.

Not only does it compare with sources from the internet, but also compares any history of past essays written by students, and or past students, that may exist within the computers system. However, it is believed that one out of three high school students plagiarize an assessment with the help of the internet (Facts and Stats). It is almost impossible for teachers to interrogate and punish all of these students simply because they have greater responsibilities. Therefore, as generations pass through high schools, school administration and teachers will develop strategies to implement within their course to help prevent the crime of plagiarism. An article published in 2011, concludes the idea that plagiarism is on the rise, and they it must be fought. Some technique enlisted within the article include choosing more abstract prompts and having more assignments completed within class time (Bailey). By implementing a creative prompt, the educational system will become more concrete as students will have a harder time finding an essay to copy relating to such a subject. Having a prompt dealing with the individual itself will be nearly impossible to

Students are typically assigned tasks and evaluated based on their understanding of the concepts that they are taught in class. Therefore, if a student plagiarizes other people’s work and presents it as his or her own, an instructor will be misled into evaluating the work of the original author rather than the actual student. This undermines the quality and meaningfulness of the learning process since students will not be evaluated properly (Hall 181). Moreover, students who plagiarize others’ work exert unfair competition unto students who are diligent and honest (181). It may be very disheartening for students who submit their own work to get lower scores than others who are dishonest. In order to ensure that learning occurs under fair conditions, it is important for all students to observe standard rules of academic

The demonstration of showing the thoughts of others as your own without referencing known as plagiarism. This is cheating and degrades academic standards. One of the most important contributing factors that make plagiarism a worldwide problem is the simple access to web assets, where all the investigative papers and reports are effectively accessible. It has been evaluated that plagiarism has always been an area of interest for both administrators and teachers when they want efforts of students in order to reflect the learning consequences. On the other hand, the web is anything but difficult to access to practically boundless composed material on each possible subject, suspicion of understudy copying has started to influence educators at all levels with the advent of the internet. The thought of the center estimations of scholarly respectability is the part of greater image of individual integrity at the heart of the plagiarism debate. A link between their values and plagiarism from the students has been observed from past articles. However, plagiarism is an ever-increasing issue (Appiah, 2016).

Figure 2 shows why plagiarism is wrong. Answer [2.B] is chosen by 66.7% students with the perception that it is dishonest. Meanwhile, answer [2.A] and [2.C] are chosen by 40% students, 33% students choose answer [2.E] and the rest ones, 1.3% students mark answer [2.D]. This result indicates that most of them know that plagiarism is dishonest. Interestingly, by 40% indication of [2.A] and [2.C], the students know that plagiarism will not only measure their achievement but also it will risk their marks. Having a little difference, 33% students believe that plagiarism steals other people ideas [2.D] and the rest, 13.3% students think that nothing learnt by doing plagiarism. This result is consistent with the theories from Park (2003), Anderson

In his article, Cultural insight can help tackle plagiarism, John Gill discusses the importance of understanding plagiarism, the issues some cultures like the chinese face, and the difficulty of changing their way of approaching plagiarism when studying abroad in the U.K.

Plagiarism is a growing and ongoing issue, not just in the United States, but throughout the entire world as well. However, many students inof higher education do not see it as such a big problem and most of the time do not realize they are plagiarizing. Plagiarism, in most universities can lead to serious consequences including expulsion from the institution. In the popular article, “The Plagiarism Plague,” Raymond Schroth discusses a case where he caught a student, who was one of the better ones, plagiarizing. He also discusses the China syndrome which is when foreign Chinese students are sent to attend universities in the United States and have Chinese agencies write their admissions essay and put together their applications. In addition these agencies falsify letterheads and create

Many academic institutions, including high-schools, colleges, and universities, have enacted tough penalties for students who implement plagiarism tactics to complete assignments. The University of Phoenix defines plagiarism as “intentional or unintentional representation of another’s words or ideas as one’s own in an academic exercise.”(University of Phoenix Catalog, 2008, p 25) They further explain that plagiarism includes copying information exactly or paraphrasing without citing sources. They also incorporate into the plagiarism definition the submission of another’s work and self-plagiarism. For example, many internet websites sell students term papers, research papers, and essays. The emergence of internet websites offering these services has caused educators to implement plagiarism detecting software programs. The internet companies, specializing in selling papers, have countered this inconvenience with services providing original term papers (Buy Term Papers, 2006). Superior Papers justifies students purchasing papers, stating on their website,

Plagiarism has long since been an issue- especially in the classroom. Students try to pass off other people’s work as their own, sometimes stealing ideas, other times even entire papers. In Melissa D’Annunzio’s Ted Talk, “The Punishable Perils of Plagiarism”, she illustrates the severity of plagiarism through an animated video. In the video, there’s a fake department in charge of tracking down people who plagiarize and then throwing them in jail. By making up this scenario, she shows just how serious plagiarism is, and how that is often highly underestimated. In the article “Avoiding Plagiarism”, Karl Stolley, Allen Brizee, and Joshua Paiz go into the different types of plagiarism- from unintentional to intentional and highlight some of the struggles students face when trying to avoid plagiarism. In the journal article “Does the Adoption of Plagiarism- detection Software in Higher Education Reduce Plagiarism?” by Robert J. Youmans, two studies are discussed, and it’s shown how even telling students that their work will be checked against plagiarism- detection software doesn’t keep them from plagiarizing. By looking at these three sources, and comparing and contrasting them, the issue of plagiarism can be greater realized.

There are numerous ways to plagiarize. These include copying somebody’s work and saying it is yours, faking an area where information was obtained, falsifying data, as well as cheating. These are only a few of the many ways that information can be plagiarized. There are many statistics that can show that there is an increase in the number and severity of plagiarism cases. Shockingly, almost 80% of college students admit to cheating at least once, 36% of undergraduates have admitted to plagiarizing written material, and, to emphasize the effect of the internet, 30% of a large sampling of Berkley students were caught plagiarizing directly from the Internet. This is surprising considering the consequences of plagiarism. Along with these college statistics, another interesting statistic from “Plagiarism.Org” is that 58.3% of high school students let someone else copy their work in 1969, and 97.5% did so in 1989. This is a huge increase. It is up to personal opinions to determine whether the Internet has caused this increase, and if it has, what is the percentage at today? College students should know better than to use somebody else’s work, and in

Plagiarism has always been a problem in several academic institutions. Also, plagiarism has promoted academic dishonesty and unethical behavior to students in the past years. It is therefore a shared responsibility of instructors, schools and even the students to eliminate this practice and continually strengthen the standards of education.

Plagiarism can be defined as use of words or ideas of another person and presenting them as one’s own. In certain academic cultures this act is considered as an intellectual theft whereas in some others it is viewed as a praise to the original author and something that student should be credited for using it within an appropriate context. However, when we consider the most of the western academic cultures students are strongly advised to refrain from copying or either paraphrasing original texts and ideas in their academic writing due to that fact that it may results severe actions such as students being suspended or dismissed from the institutions. Furthermore, it is widely claimed that it is international students (ESL) students who are more likely to plagiarise. It will be argued that most of the time these international students who are found guilty of plagiarising are due to completely contrasting reasons when it is done by an non ESL student. This essay analysis the main reasons behind ESL students being more prone to plagiarism. This essay will deal about the reasonable factors which leads international students to plagiarize in an alienated educational culture and to which extent some of these actions can be justified when they especially target ESL learners in the act of plagiarism.