Plaintiff

The definition of a lawsuit is a civil action brought in court in which a plaintiff demands another person, known as the defendant, pay this person equitable resolve (dictionary.com). In other words they want payment for being wronged in the past. If the case is found to be legitimate and proven justifiable, the defendant pays the plaintiff the awarded compensation. This brings us to the story, The Lawsuit, by Naguib Mahfouz. This tale is about a son being sued by his father’s widow demanding maintenance be paid to her some twenty years after the father’s death. Several of the individuals in this story serve very little purpose.

Additional Damages– The Courts felt that the employer owes an obligation of good faith and fair dealing in the way in which it dismisses an employee. They did not condone terminating employees in a callous and insensitive way and showing no regard for well-being when terminating an employee. The plaintiff Mr. Beatty stated that his termination was carried out in a dishonest, unfair and insensitive way even though the termination was “without cause”. He was called to Mr. Lebeter’s office and informed of his dismissal and given his letter of termination. He stated this

28) The Plaintiff was on paid Administrative leave for over 6 months. Which was damaging his career and relationship with his children.

The case focuses mainly on two parts, one being Tony’s motivation to work and the other being Hickling’s leadership. It discusses how Tony was retrenched after his previous company was engulfed with financial difficulties. Subsequently, he was offered the same position in another similar organisation, which was headed by Hickling. Hickling had a contrasting style of leadership which Tony was uncomfortable with. Whilst working there, Tony encountered several issues that made him feel uneasy. There was an obvious disparity in the work procedures between Hickling’s Associates and Tony’s previous organisation, to the point that Tony was still unclear regarding certain issues till the day he resigned from Hickling’s Associates.

3. Was Benko’s remark that the plaintiff would “probably not get the job” when the plaintiff

Now through undersigned counsel, come Defendant, Lauris Hollis ("Defendant"), who respectfully request that this Court grant their Motion for Summary Judgment dismissing the Plaintiff 's claims against him. Defendant move this Court for a Summary Judgment on the grounds that the Plaintiff has no cause of action, no right of action or no interest in the plaintiff to institute the suit and it should be dismissed.

Upon my arrival, I met with the complainant Mark Shipman. Mark Shipman told me on August 15, 2015, he was at his bosses residence located at 145 County Road 4839, Winnsboro, Texas 75494. Mark Shipman stated they were working on his bosses property when he observed one of the workers were not there with them, Wayne Beardon, suspect. Mark Shipman told me he went to go look for Wayne Beardon, Mark Shipman said when he was looking for him and observed him buy his vehicle. On August 13, 2015, Mark Shipman told me his land lord called him and ask him about his rent money. When he went to go get his money

Upon my arrival, I spoke with the complainant Jerry McDonald. Mr. McDonald told me he went to town to runs some errands. When Mr. McDonald returned back to his residence he observed his Lincoln car was not at his residence, so he figure his wife had went to town in the car. Mr. McDonald told me when he walked inside his residence his wife was inside their residence. He asked his wife where the car was and she had thought Mr. McDonald had taken it to town. Mr. McDonald stated whoever stole his vehicle had to hot wire the vehicle because the keys were not in it. Mr. McDonald gave me the title

At approximately 1640 hours, on February 5, 2016, a male subject went to his girlfriend father’s residence on Co-op Road East, in the Hampton area of Hampton County and took a vehicle without permission. The vehicle was a white 2005 Malibu. The complainant, William Nix, made allegations that the subject, Jennife Walling, did not have permission to take the vehicle off of his property.

Defendant SARAH MINER, owner, and operator of the Portola apartment complex, recently denied Plaintiff DARLAWILLIAMS, a former tenant, application to continue leasing her unit in the complex. Plaintiff subsequently brought suit against Defendant, alleging discrimination as the basis for her denial. The Plaintiff 's case against Defendant, however, is without merit. Defendant denied Plaintiff 's application because she received several noise complaints (Exhibit 1) throughout her tenancy, disrupting the peaceful residential community. Furthermore, Defendant denied Plaintiff 's application due to her failure to keep her unit in good condition; resulting in substantial damage to the unit and approximately $3,500 in repair

Identify and analyze the possible claims that Julie has against her employer. Identify and evaluate the legal basis for the claim, the potential recovery, and the likelihood of prevailing against her employer. (Points : 30)

Facts: The plaintiff was an employed for the defendant. The defendant informed the plaintiff that his position would be eliminated because of budget constraints. The defendant gave him the option of resigning and retiring or waiting until the December when the position would be terminated. The decision had to be made before the date of June 30th however there was new retirement policy taking effect on July 1st which would cause the plantiff not to receive his post-retirement medical benefits.

Sabine Dupont is the Plaintiff and believes Ronald Witherspoon the Defendant created false statements against her on the sole purpose of her leaving his company to start her own company. The Plaintiff believes the Defendant purposefully did this to discredit her reputation. Whether the allegations made by the Defendant or not are true, the Plaintiffs image and business has suffered a great amount, even after the Plaintiff made the Defendant aware that her intention was not to compete with his business. As proof there are existing fliers of both businesses, and as shown the Plaintiffs flyer shows no sign of intended competition. The relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant was very friendly and close. The Defendant believes the Plaintiff has misjudged what has occurred to her the past few months, as retaliation from him. The Plaintiff worked for the Defendant for four years and within all that time there were no issues until the Plaintiffs work plans changed. Of course the most important evidence of all is the letter by Delilah Simpson where she informs us of Mr. Witherspoon ill-informed communication to her.

In the evening of September 20, 2003 four friends chose to eat at Chili’s Grill and Bar and at the end of their meal they received their bill of $56 dollars and made a decision to walk out without paying their tab. A regular at the restaurant noticed this decision and chose to walk out of the restaurant and follow the four friends with his white unmarked vehicle. Once the friends noticed they had someone following behind them they stopped into a Best Buy parking lot where they were then confronted by the gentleman. The gentleman proceeded to tell the friends that he noticed what happened and they would not get away with their action. The friends drove off and soon after a high-speed pursuit emerged and ended with the friends wrecking their vehicle. In a short amount of time after the incident occurred the friends decided to sue Chili’s Grill and Bar for damages that occurred from the pursuit from the unmarked gentleman.

Online GPS software was used to get us to the Insureds residence. The meeting occurred at an address at 2074 W. 262nd Street, Lomita, CA 90717. The house is described as a single-level light blue stucco home with an attached garage located on the left side of the residence, which has a driveway which runs out onto 262nd Street. The layout in front of the home does not have a front doorway or a front porch on the front of the residence is aligned with birch trees which run parallel alongside against the front of the house facing the street and the front lawn. The yard which is visible from the street seems to be weedy containing with various types of fescue which needed cutting an edging. The only pathway to a front door which is located on the West-side of the house can be reached from a long-cemented pathway that reaches from the sidewalk to the front door, which has a one-foot high concrete slab in front of the doorway. There were no handicap assistive devices, ramps or railing which was adjacent or near the front door. We did not find any children toys or recreational vehicles observed on the property, other than an Economy Class green van which had been parked in front of the Insureds residence, with a CA-license plate number 5CBN612. During the interview, the Insured maintained that the van which was parked in front of his house belonged to him.