Plan for Suspect Interview Pe Essay

On November 4, 2016 I was fortunate enough to interview Sergeant Dave Vitera. He was born in Nebraska and has lived here in this state for all of his life. He has three children, two that are in college. Sergeant Vitera is an investigator for the Grand Island Police Department. He says that ever since he was a little kid he would always stand up for the underdog. He has always had a great sense from right and wrong. When he went to the University of Kearney at Nebraska he took criminal justice electives in which he enjoyed. Sergeant Vitera holds a bachelor’s degree in criminal justice and a minor in psychology. He also went to graduate school for counseling and psychology for one year. That is how his interests in this field begun and became

The specific aims and purposes of criminal law is to punish criminals, and prevent people from becoming future criminals by using deterrence. “Having a criminal justice system that imposes liability and punishment for violations deter.” (Paul H. Robinson, John M. Darley, Does Criminal Law Deter? A Behavioural Science Investigation, Oxford Journal of Legal studies, volume 24, No. 2 (2004), pp. 173-205). Criminal law

Det. Patel was interviewed as a subject officer. He stated that on Tuesday June 9, 2015 he worked a 0800 X 1600 tour, and was assigned as an investigator. He stated that he could not recall being notified in regards to Shawn Thomas's arrest on June 8, 2015 by TD-30, or that Mr. Thomas had an active I-card out of the 110 Squad with probable cause to arrest for Grand Larceny. He did confirm that it was his tax number use d for the inquiry and that no one else had access to his computer password. Based on this information, he acknowledged that he did conducted the inquiry. He could not recall conducting an ESP Inquiry on Tuesday June 9, 2015, at 0913 hours on the name Shawn Thomas, and did not know why he would have conducted the inquiry. He could

The first interrogation we watched in class was that of a 20-year-old named Joshua Tuttle. Mr. Tuttle was being charged with attempted unlawful sexual conduct with a minor. He was messaging and supposed to be meeting up with a girl named Jesse who he thought was 13 or 14. Joshua was the focus of a sting operation and has been featured on the television program “To Catch a Predator”. When we picked up on the interrogation, Joshua was sitting across the table from the interrogator. Joshua’s chair was pushed up against the wall and in the corner of the room. This is good because it is supposed to make him uncomfortable. The table that sat between Joshua and the interrogator was cluttered with papers. This is not good because this gives the suspect something to look at besides the interrogator, which in turn can change the suspect’s body language and or answers.

We all do our best to protect what is ours, but how far will we go to do that and will it justify our reasons behind our actions? Whether it’s protecting our properties and possessions, or family or even ourselves, situations get out of hand and we are faced with making decisions that could change our lives and the lives of those around us. The tiniest detail can determine ones actions as justifiable or unjustifiable. For Don Luis Ceballos and Judy-Ann Laws Norman their actions of defense were unjustifiable according to a jury.

Have you ever heard of the theory of the middle child and how they are the “forgotten” one? Well, that was me. It wasn’t until he came home that I realized everything had changed. I knew my mom tried to care for and pay attention to me, but it wasn’t enough. I was only eight when my younger brother, Abraham was born. When I found out that there was a baby on the way I was extremely excited to finally have my own little partner in crime, but things didn’t turn out that way. With a new baby at home, everything was different. My dad was now working two jobs to support our newly expanded family and all of my mom’s time was dedicated to the newest member of our family. I constantly called for attention as I felt neglected and

When a person is charged with a crime the type of defense that they choose could ultimately determine their fate. There are many different types of defenses that exist in our criminal justice system. In this paper I will be taking a brief look at two different cases that have implored two different types of criminal defenses. I will look at the nature and types of defenses used in the cases and what evidence was used to demonstrate defense. I will describe how justification and excuse played a role in the cases and I will also be describing the outcome of each case.

Psychology has always had a direct impact on my life for many years for example, I myself have had counselling sessions for anxiety. Experiencing this has given me a desire to work with people in understanding their behaviour and how their minds work to be able to empower individuals to lead better lives. My own personal experience with anxiety has also intrigued me into thinking why I think the way I do and what can be put into action to improve my circumstances.

The first stage of a search warrant happens prior to executing the warrant. First I would apply for the warrant detailing specifically where I will be conducting the search, what items I am looking for such as the MacBook. Once a judge approves the search warrant I would review it one more time before starting to execute. I would be double checking to make sure all of the information is correct and looking over and search protocols the judge may have added when approving the search. These could be things such as not being able to look for evidence of another crime and so on. Once I have received the approved warrant I would review it, looking at any changes the judge made.

I was born in the U.S but raised in Mexico and came back to the U.S when i was eleven years old. As a kid i saw how many people broke the law and how it affected the whole community around them.Use and distribution of drugs, theft, and killings, all that and the fact that i’ve always liked to help people to turn their life around made me want to go into law enforcement and i hope one day i can be part of the FBI.

According to Schmalleger (2011), identity theft is defined as misusing another person’s personal information for personal gain (p. 382). This can involve a person opening credit cards or accounts in another person’s name (Schmalleger, 2011, p. 382). Considering the nature of identity theft crimes, investigators must rely on electronic crime scenes (Lushbaugh & Weston, 2012, p. 248). Therefore, investigators must know how to initiate, conduct and execute an identity theft investigation. This essay will provide a mock case and electronic crime scene, including the steps a cybercrime investigator would take to obtain necessary background information of the victim and offender, as well as the types of evidence acquired from the investigation.

When re-watching my first mock interview, I find it to be humorous. I find it to be humorous because I was embarrassing. There are many things in the first mock interview that I can improve on. Right off the bat, in my first question, I stumble on my words because of how nervous I am. My appearance is also horrendous.

"Investigation may be likened to the long months of pregnancy, and solving a problem to the day of birth. To investigate a problem is, indeed, to solve it." This quote, by Mao Tse-Tung, reveals the skill and mind set that is required of one. A criminal investigation is an science that involves the study of facts, identify, Problem solving, leadership, social perception, multitasking, and proving a criminal is guilty. The process of a criminal investigation includes searching,photographing , evidence collection, and interrogating criminals. If one is considering a field in criminal investigation, generally one must be able to solve problems no matter how long or frustrating it gets. Being a criminal investigator requires one to have at least a associate's or bachelor's degree. It also requires one to have a understading of Criminal justice, Problem

Often time people become frustrated very quickly when they do not get the answer they want when they want them. In many Interrogations the criminal is often nonnegotiable with law enforcement resulting in the interviewer becoming very agitated if the case is time sensitive. In the scenario involving a suspected terrorist not planting a bomb in a local shopping center with a two time limit, I would definitely try to get information any way I can to protect innocent lives and to save the structure of the shopping center. However if my partner were to unplug all the recording equipment and ask me to leave the room I wouldn’t because I know what my partner intends on doing an illegal act. There are always consequences in a situation like that because there has to be a record of how the interrogation was conducted and without any recording of the most pivotal part involving the code to deactivate the bomb an investigation can be launched against the law enforcement agency. Even if my partner feels pressed on time there are better ways to go about getting information that doesn’t involve beating a man even if he is a terrorist putting countless lives at stake.

Before we can consider its’ effects on the recipient, we first need to put context to the specific interpretation of silence with regards to this study. In this case we are examining the effect on the interviewer as a recipient in a suspect interview.