Planned Parenthood Abortion Case Study

If the price of abortion were raised then fewer people will be able to afford one. A few cons of this compromise include the black market providing abortions for a cheaper price, people resorting to crime to get money, or an increase in overdosing or using deadly combinations of drugs for self-abortion. A few pros of this compromise include using the money from abortions to pay for some necessities needed for orphanages located in that state, thereby giving back to the community; those who support the pro-life side gain harder-to-afford abortions; and those who support the pro-choice side gain the ability to have an abortion. However, this increase in price will be significant but still affordable to most people. If the price is too much there can be relief funds to help those who want an

Governmental funding is an enormous piece of the puzzle sparking mass debates and becoming a part of the center piece into the topic itself. The program has also been under suspicion of selling aborted babies and their body parts in the black market to make a profit, which in turn breaks many federal abortion laws and would immediately cause a cease to Planned Parenthoods future and present operations.

Planned Parenthood has provided high-quality, affordable, healthcare to 2.5 million women, men, and teens for over 100 years. It is essential to have available for the community. Planned Parenthood gives lower class families the same option to healthcare as upper class families have. Planned Parenthood is a nonprofit organization health clinic that many have grown to trust. Shutting down Planned Parenthood services would cause a national disaster.

Even on the patient consent form, patients at Planned Parenthood sign a form that says “I agree to give my blood and/or the tissue from the abortion as a gift to be used for education, research or treatment.” for scientic research on diabetes, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, cancer and AIDS. A professor of University of Wisconsin-Madison’s law, medicine and public health, explains that it makes sense that money is involved in the procurement of tissue and organs, even if that involves fetal specimen. The professor, R. Alta Charo says, “It’s been going on for 50 or 60 years; it’s ordinary practice,” she says. “There is good reason for it. We want to help the people who are living or may be living in the future.” But according to Eric Ferrero, vice president of communications at Planned Parenthood Federation of America, says the research has advanced vaccines, treatments for life-threatening diseases, and goes toward finding cures for specific maternal and infant health conditions. The National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act even allows for “reasonable payments associated with transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control, or storage of human fetal issue.” This law doesn’t define “reasonable payments”, so violations can be difficut to prove. Most Planned Parenthood facilities and any abortion provider don’t have control over how fetal tissue is ultimately used and many women (patients) are uninformed of the possibilities of how their “donation” is used in the consent forms. Research to develop skin cosmetics and anti-aging products has also benefitted from the collecting of fetal tissue (non-medical) and there isn’t a standing law that prevents

Planned Parenthood encourages people to take free medical care without having to worry and control whether or not they want to have a baby or not. Most believe that if you get pregnant you can decide to have an abortion or keep it. An average of 21% ended in abortions out of all pregnancies america. 4 out of 10 unintended pregnancies have led to abortion. And instead of those who receive the medical care to pay for it, they have the taxpayers pay for the medicaid. The taxpayers go to the companies that give money to the organization and the money goes to them. It is not fair to the people who oppose or don’t need Planned Parenthood because those who can not afford to pay, just take the take the taxpayers money. And the users could just keep going to Planned Parenthood and not have to pay, while the rest suffer from higher taxes and trying to pay their own bills. Also, Planned Parenthood is also breaking the 14th amendment by not giving rights to an unborn citizen and just killing the child. Planned Parenthood already takes in so much money to keep the organization to run so it’s better if the organization to be defunded. The women should do it the right way and use their rights for better such as get a job make money to pay for the child and the education. Therefore, Planned Parenthood is not the organization willing to donate or pay for nor should it be

In The United States of America the sale of organs as well as modifying abortion techniques in order to obtain these bodies are prohibited by law. Every 333.964 abortions they make approximately $150M; in other words, each fetus is around $451 leaving aside the money Planned Parenthood received from the government that is around $700M annually.

It is complacent to think one can obey the law in order for society to progress. The state should never be looked at as a metric for ethics. One can observe history to understand that. Freedom is a constant struggle that involves grassroot movements, collectivization and solidarity of the communities. The people must liberate themselves and cannot expect oppressors to relinquish their rights. One can see these concepts in movements throughout history.

And it’s precisely this argument that’s been marshaled lately in response to a new reminder of the fleshly realities of abortion: The conversations, videotaped covertly by pro-life activists posing as fetal organ buyers, in which officials from Planned Parenthood cheerfully discuss the procedures for extracting those organs intact during an abortion and the prices they command.

When the taxpayer-funded liberal group isn't selling baby body parts for profit, Planned Parenthood is seeking to indoctrinate children that killing unborn children is acceptable.

Planned Parenthood is a nonprofit organization that was started about one hundred years ago and provides reproductive healthcare needs to mainly those of low-income or the uninsured. They provide information and education of sexually transmitted diseases, they can prescribe birth control to women, and they also give out contraceptives. All of this is on a donation basis. This organization seems to do a lot of good for those who otherwise wouldn’t be able to afford good healthcare. So why is it then that some government officials are wishing to defund this organization? It seems that some videos of Planned Parenthood officials have been leaked, and apparently they are talking about selling the body parts of aborted fetuses. According tom The Never Ending Fight, Republicans are arguing that the issue here is that people don’t know what is going on at Planned Parenthood behind closed doors, while Democrats are saying that this isn’t the issue here at all. They’re arguing that the Republicans issue is the fact that some Planned Parenthoods are offering abortion at all. Democrats say that if they defund

This has been talked about for many years.Some people might say that embryonic stem cell research is immoral, but i believe that if a mother doesn’t think she would be a good fit for a mother, or she just doesn’t have the needs for the baby, who are we to tell her she is wrong or she should keep the baby. In my opinion ,if she is having an abortion most likely she can’t take care of the baby. This is how poverty starts ,because mothers have kids that they can not take care of. Do i agree with killing a human life, no but poverty is one of our biggest problem the world period. In 2018 almost 80% of the world is living in poverty ,53% are children, embryonic stem cell research doesn’t take life, but if doesn’t let the baby leave with having any meaning, they were apart of something greater than death,they might of brought scientist one step closer to finding a cure.I agree with embryonic stem cell research because if could stop taking love ones away it could help a lot of people born with something wrong with

In order to identify the problem of egg donation, one must take into account the harm that is attached to said problem. Without payment regulations, egg donation agencies have the ability to compete with one another to receive more donations. This lack of order is detrimental to the health of women because of the financial encouragement to become repeat donors. To decrease the number of repeat donors, all egg donation agencies should strictly implement the $10,000 maximum payment set forth by the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM).

In the investigation of Hwang’s research, it was determined that 75% of the eggs used were either purchased or obtained by offering women reduced costs for IVF in exchange for the eggs (Baylis 390). Purchasing eggs or trading for IVF will inherently attract donors who are poor and infertile. This method of egg procurement is ethically questionable because it targets vulnerable populations. However, at the time of Hwang’s work, there was no international consensus regarding purchasing and trading eggs, and even today there is much debate about the appropriateness of this sort of exchange. For example, both the International Society for Stem Cell Research and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine agree that women cannot be expected to undergo the risks and discomfort associated with egg donation without any sort of compensation (Baylis 390). Although this is a fair point, it must be kept within reason. It is understandable that there would be some compensation for the discomfort, but the monetary value must be kept low enough that the amount can easily be refused if the donors do not feel comfortable with the associated risks. Along these lines, it is not acceptable to offer women reduced rates on IVF treatment, since for many seeking IVF, the chance of being able to conceive a child would be far greater in value than any sort of monetary compensation and would not be easily refused even if the donor was uncomfortable with the

One of the ethical issues that people have about in vitro fertilization is that people will opt for in vitro fertilization to try and solve infertility. Previously in the past adoption was the solution for this problem. Due to the creation of the in vitro fertilization method most people believe others would prefer to try conceiving their own child versus adopting one. If true, then adoption rates will decline, leading to more children in foster care and group homes. Not only do people have ethical issues concerning in vitro fertilization, they also have moral issues as well.

It is, first of all, the problem of “ extra embryos” and the possibility of their destruction, sale, abuse, and a number of others that remains unsolved. Theoretically, the number of potential children from one donor may exceed the entire population of the earth. From a utilitarian’s point of view, the act of surrogacy is ethical as the families as well as the surrogate mother are all happy in the end.