Plasmid Vs Ampicillin

What was expected that the strains of E. coli that did not have a resistance to ampicillin would not grow. The transformed strain also changed to a blue color when the X-gal was present in plate. The transformed cells also grew because they were free of the ampicillin because they possessed the amp gene that they used as an shield against the ampicillin antibiotic. The transformed cell who turned blue did so because the gene converted the sugar to a blue color but also contained the amp gene to ensure that they grew even when the ampicillin was present. The growth of the colonies on the plates

pUC19 contains ampicillin resistance gene, which allows selection for bacteria that has received a copy of the

As predicted the E. coli colony transformed with either the PUC18 or the lux plasmid developed an ampicillin resistance. Which made it easier for them to not only survive but also replicate in both the LB agar plates and the LB ampicillin rich agar plate. However the E. coli colony not treated with the plasmids could not survive and colonize in the LB ampicillin rich agar plates. The plate that had no ampicillin in its environment and no plasmid treated E. coli served as a positive control for this experiment because it demonstrated how the E. coli would colonize and grow in a normal setting. The cells in the positive control plate grew into lawn colonies because they were not placed into a selective environment or transformed, so they had no need to acquire ampicillin resistance. Two plates in the experiment contained E. coli cells that were transformed with either the PUC18 or the lux plasmid but were placed in an ampicillin free environment. These two colonies grew

(Biology Dept.). 0.1 ml of E.coli K or 0.1ml of E.coli B was added to the 10 fold dilution. Using soft agar technique, the growth media mixture with E.coli was plated and incubated.

E. coli HB101 was transformed with pGLO plasmid then grown on media containing ampicillin and/or arabinose and on medium containing neither (Brown, 2011). This is done for selection of transformed cells since not all cells are expected to take up the plasmid (Brown, 2011). We also expect roughly the same CFU on any plate(s) receiving samples from the same microcentrifuge tube, since they are getting the exact same

The color of the bacteria was a whitish color and the colony size is similar both before and after the transformation. The best way to do it is to compare the control of the experimental plates. Cells that were typically not treated with the plasmid could not grow on ampicillin, although cells that were treated with the plasmid can grow on the LB/AMP plate. The plasmid would have to confer resistance to ampicillin. Moving on, the GFP gene is what is glowing in the plate because it was activated by the sugar arabinose. The sugar arabinose and the plasmid DNA are also needed to be present because that is what initially turns on the GFP gene which makes the bacteria glow. Organisms can also turn on and off particular genes for camouflage reasons. An organism would benefit from turning on and off certain

70µL of competent E.coli are added to both test tubes; pUC18 and Lux (Alberte et al., 2012). Both test tubes are then tapped and placed back into the ice bath for 15 minutes. While waiting, another test tube is obtained, filled with 35µL of competent cells and labeled NP for no plasmid. A water bath is preheated to 37 degrees Celsius and all three labeled test tubes are inserted into the bath for five minutes (Alberte et al., 2012). Using a sterile pipet 300µL of nutrient broth are inserted into both the control and Lux test tubes and 150µL are inserted to the no plasmid test tube to increase bacterial growth. All three test tubes are then incubated at 37 degrees for 45 minutes. Six agar plates are obtained and labeled to correspond each test tube, three of the plates contain ampicillin. A pipet is used to remove 130µl from each test tube containing a plasmid and insert it into the corresponding agar plate. For this, a cell spreader is first

The plasmid pGLO contains an antibiotic-resistance gene, ampR, and the GFP gene is regulated by the control region of the ara operon. Ampicillin is an antibiotic that kills E. coli, so if E. coli, so if E. coli cells contain the ampicillin-resistance gene, the cells can survive exposure to ampicillin since the ampicillin-resistance gene encodes an enzyme that inactivates the antibiotic. Thus, transformed E. coli cells containing ampicillin-resistance plasmids can easily be selected simply growing the bacteria in the presence of ampicillin-only the transformed cells survive. The ara control region regulates GFP expression by the addition of arabinose, so the GFP gene can be turned on and

The purpose of this experiment was to show the genetic transformation of E. coli bacteria with a plasmid that codes for Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and contains a gene regulatory system that confers ampicillin resistance. A plasmid is a genetic structure in a cell that can replicate independently of chromosomes. In this lab, the Green Fluorescent Protein, which is typically found in the bioluminescent jellyfish Aequorea Victoria, was cloned, purified, and moved from one organism to another with the use of pGlo plasmids. It was hypothesized that if bacteria that were transformed with +pGlo plasmids are given the gene for GFP, then transformed cell colonies

There of the dishes turned out as expected in this experiment. Our group expected there to be growth in the LB -pGLO dish as the bacteria were not exposed to the antibiotic ampicillin. Furthermore, our group also expected to see inhibited bacterial growth in the LB/amp +pGLO dish as there was ampicillin in the dish, but some of the bacteria were immune as they possessed immunity to the ampicillin. Moreover, our group expected that there would be no bacterial growth in the LB/amp -pGLO dish, as the bacteria were exposed to ampicillin and were not immune. However, the final dish, LB/amp/arbo +pGLO, did not turn out as expected. While it was expected to allow for inhibited bacterial growth and the bacteria to become florescent,

While leading this analysis, gene expression was critical to the results of the non-transformed and changed cells. In its procedure of choice, the bacterial cells should have picked if they ought to allow the ampicillin safe quality, therefore indicating commendable components of quality expression. The Escherichia coli's cells were not changed, there seems to have been an error during the experiment. There should have been a slight change in a way that there should have been a colonial growth design in the bacterial cells that had ampicillin safe plasmid. (Hidalgo, Nuria Fernández) On the other hand the cells that were on the ampicillin (lux, control, and NP) demonstrated a colonial design because of the non-transformed cells dying due to

In this experiment some mistakes and errors that could have impacted on the results. Firstly, it was really difficult to place the amoxicillin paper to the agar plant. Some amoxicillin was smeared some place of the agar plate by mistake, which would influence the result. Furthermore, the discs were put on the table, where are lot of different micro-organisms. Moreover, the agar plates were open when they were put on the disk for a long time after the E. coli have spread around them. Some micro-organisms that are floating in the air could have been place on the agar plates. One agar plate was damaged because smear the E. coli too hard. These kind of human mistakes were all caused by incaution of the operators. The experiment should be done more

This was seen in both trial A and B, where the plates exhibited no growth (Table 1, Table 2). The lack of plasmid in the presence of the ampicillin, makes the growth of bacteria impossible because the ampicillin destroyed the E. coli cells by breaking down their cell walls (How do Antibiotics..., 2006). The bacteria had no added substance which would make them resistant to the ampicillin (Edvotek, 2014). Since no growth occurred on either plate, the transformation efficiency was unable to be evaluated (Table 1, table 2). This plate was used as a control to show that without ampicillin bacteria would not be able to grow without plasmid DNA.

Geneticists continue to look for ways to genetically alter genes and transformation to better the lives of other people. In this experiment the goal was to understand the transformation process and how genetically engineering bacteria could possibly be useful. The transformation process involved 5 steps: pre-incubation, incubation, heat chock, recovery and growth, and selection. Four different plates were used to analyze the effects of the transformation. The plates were as follows: plate 1 contained lysogenic broth (LB) and ampicillin (amp) with plasmids (pGLO); plate 2 contained LB/amp/arabinose sugar with pGLO; plate 3 contained LB/amp without pGLO; and plate 4 contained LB without pGLO. The results obtained proved our hypotheses to be correct.

This experiment was performed to test the hypothesis if LB nutrient broth, +pGLO and -pGLO Ampicillin, and Arabinose was placed in the E. coli plates, then there will be a significant growth in the newly transformed bacteria and it will possess the ability to glow under UV light. The measurements were recorded from the bent glass tube in each glass test tube. The transformation protocol tested for the newly possessed traits in E.coli bacteria. Throughout the experiment there were many probable reasons for failure. If the pipettes and sterile loop were not thrown out in between each use, a cross contamination could cause a miscalculation in the experiment causing the data results to fail. The hypothesis that was tested was validated due to the positive results with each experiment stating that newly transformed organisms due in fact pass on traits.